Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Bush Outlines Campaign Reform Principles
The Whitehouse ^ | March 15, 2001 (One year ago) | George W. Bush

Posted on 03/22/2002 1:12:55 PM PST by Jim Robinson

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
March 15, 2001

President Bush Outlines Campaign Reform Principles

March 15, 2001

The Honorable Trent Lott
Senate Majority Leader
S-230, The Capitol
Washington, DC  20510

Dear Senator Lott:

     As the Senate prepares to consider campaign finance reform legislation, I wanted to highlight my principles for reform.  I am committed to working with the Congress to ensure that fair and balanced campaign reform legislation is enacted.

     These principles represent my framework for assessing campaign finance reform legislation.  I remain open to other ideas to meet shared goals.

     I am hopeful that, working together, we can achieve responsible campaign finance reforms.

Sincerely,

George W. Bush


Campaign Finance Reform

President Bush's Reform Principles

Protect Rights of Individuals to Participate in Democracy: President Bush believes democracy is first and foremost about the rights of individuals to express their views.  He supports strengthening the role of individuals in the political process by: 1) updating the limits established more than two decades ago on individual giving to candidates and national parties; and 2) protecting the rights of citizen groups to engage in issue advocacy.

Maintain Strong Political Parties: President Bush believes political parties play an essential role in making America's democratic system operate.  He wants to maintain the strength of parties, and not to weaken them.  Any reform should help political parties more fully engage citizens in the political process and encourage them to express their views and to vote.

Ban Corporate and Union Soft Money:  Corporations and labor unions spend millions of dollars every election cycle in unregulated 'soft? money to influence federal elections.  President Bush supports a ban on unregulated corporate and union contributions of soft money to political parties.

Eliminate Involuntary Contributions: President Bush believes no one should be forced to support a candidate or cause against his or her will.  He therefore supports two parallel reforms:  1) legislation to prohibit corporations from using treasury funds for political activity without the permission of shareholders; and 2) legislation to require unions to obtain authorization from each dues-paying worker before spending those dues on activities unrelated to collective bargaining.

Require Full and Prompt Disclosure: President Bush also believes that in an open society, the best safeguard against abuse is full disclosure.  He supports full, prompt and constitutionally permissible disclosure of contributions and expenditures designed to influence the outcome of federal elections, so voters will have complete and timely information on which to make informed decisions.

Promote Fair, Balanced, Constitutional Approach: President Bush believes reform should not favor any one party over another or incumbents over challengers.  Both corporations and unions should be prohibited from giving soft money to political parties, and both corporations and unions should have to obtain permission from their stockholders or dues-paying workers before spending treasury funds or dues on politics.  President Bush supports including a non-severability provision, so if any provision of the bill is found unconstitutional, the entire bill is sent back to Congress for further adjustments and deliberations.  This provision will ensure fair and balanced campaign finance reform.


Return to this article at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/03/20010315-7.html


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: campaignreform; cfr; cfrlist; presidentbush; signingconditions; silenceamerica
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-238 next last
To: rdb3
If one can adequately use FR as a thermometer for the mood among conservatives

IMO, FR is not a good cross section of consertive America. Fellow conservatives I talk to everyday don't give a damn about CFR. It is a non issue.

The war of terrorism is first & foremost on everyone's minds. Right behind it are taxes, the economy, and local issue. CFR ranks right up there with what scent air freshener you like.

Looking at FR the last few days, you'd think we were no better off than starving North Koreans or burqa-clad women under Taliban rule.

121 posted on 03/22/2002 6:37:58 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

consertive = conservative
122 posted on 03/22/2002 6:38:45 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Thank you for being the voice of reason.

For those who are preaching a third party, someone please give me an example of anywhere else in the world where a multi-party system benefits conservatism, more than a two-party system.

123 posted on 03/22/2002 6:38:49 PM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
But under no circumstance were they going to give conservatives what they wanted. They stuck together like Super Glue.

Would that we were as tenacious and vicious as they are.

Tenacity BUMP!

124 posted on 03/22/2002 6:38:51 PM PST by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Dane
"...calling him a liar is a bit harsh, IMHO."

Not when he lies. Thank God some of us here will still call as we see it.

125 posted on 03/22/2002 6:40:33 PM PST by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
IMO, FR is not a good cross section of consertive America.

I agree with you.

126 posted on 03/22/2002 6:41:01 PM PST by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Again, if you haven't lived in Illinois for the past 6-10 years or so, I don't think you would understand. I happen to have lived here all my life...having a new, energetic candidate come in and run the majority of his platform on cleaning out government corruption in Illinois, is like a breath of fresh air! Pat O'Malley is an inspiring person a lot's of my friends think so too and would vote for him if he ran. I think that he can appeal to a lot of college-age kids, because he is very upbeat and has a strong sense of justice.

Although it is cliche' to say that those who do not look back to the lessons of the past end up repeating them, this maxim is totally applicable in this case we are now confronted with. One look at Jim Ryan's past record of being Attorney General and one can only hope that he has a great future behind him.

127 posted on 03/22/2002 6:43:03 PM PST by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: wcbtinman
Not when he lies. Thank God some of us here will still call as we see it.

Name the lie.

128 posted on 03/22/2002 6:43:25 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
How could that 5.1% win a run-off? The other 45% right of center vote will stay home because they are ideological purists like you. The liberal candidate still wins, but 95-5.

You must be using 'million man math', and logic. I am an idelogical purist who campaigned and voted for Bush. I did not stay home. I got out of my home and directed a campaign that placed over 5,000 flyers supporting Bush and a Republican congressional candidate. It was an effort that involved over 20 volunteers. What did you do, besides carp at "ideological purists"?

The conservatives will show up, if they have a conservative to vote for. In a run-off, it takes the responsible to show up. The libs would have to have an expensive campaign to bus their mindless dependents in. If half of all races were decided in run-offs it would bankrupt the Dems. Elections would be decided by the 15% of the electorate that was most responsible, US (except as regards to your characterizations of conservatives)!

129 posted on 03/22/2002 6:43:58 PM PST by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: FreedominJesusChrist
I regret to inform you that I read that Illinois law prohibits someone who loses in a primary to run as a third party candidate in a general election.
130 posted on 03/22/2002 6:48:37 PM PST by Barnacle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
I will NOT tolerate any backstabbing against anyone. Make your decision on this, but think it over very carefully. If you make the wrong choice, you just might lose the very fights you want to win, and you just might help elect the very people you want to keep out of office.

Bump!

131 posted on 03/22/2002 6:50:20 PM PST by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
and 2) protecting the rights of citizen groups to engage in issue advocacy.

How does that square with banning such groups from TV and Radio political ads at least a month before an election?

132 posted on 03/22/2002 6:51:32 PM PST by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Dane
"JMO, but some of the naysayers are disruptors..."

You sound like a character straight out of Orwell's 1984. Disruptors...hmmm, that is a good one. Sounds like Lemming voaculary to me. Boy, that is just such a great idea for a simple children's book...

133 posted on 03/22/2002 6:51:45 PM PST by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: wcbtinman
Show me the lies, every principle he outlined has been met

President Bush's Reform Principles

Protect Rights of Individuals to Participate in Democracy: President Bush believes democracy is first and foremost about the rights of individuals to express their views. He supports strengthening the role of individuals in the political process by: 1) updating the limits established more than two decades ago on individual giving to candidates and national parties; and 2) protecting the rights of citizen groups to engage in issue advocacy.

( Both items incorporated into the CFR)

Maintain Strong Political Parties: President Bush believes political parties play an essential role in making America's democratic system operate. He wants to maintain the strength of parties, and not to weaken them. Any reform should help political parties more fully engage citizens in the political process and encourage them to express their views and to vote

. (National parties lose influence and state parties gain influence in the CFR…good thing)

Ban Corporate and Union Soft Money: Corporations and labor unions spend millions of dollars every election cycle in unregulated 'soft? money to influence federal elections. President Bush supports a ban on unregulated corporate and union contributions of soft money to political parties.

(Both items in CFR)

Eliminate Involuntary Contributions: President Bush believes no one should be forced to support a candidate or cause against his or her will. He therefore supports two parallel reforms: 1) legislation to prohibit corporations from using treasury funds for political activity without the permission of shareholders; and 2) legislation to require unions to obtain authorization from each dues-paying worker before spending those dues on activities unrelated to collective bargaining.

(Done by executive order)

Require Full and Prompt Disclosure: President Bush also believes that in an open society, the best safeguard against abuse is full disclosure. He supports full, prompt and constitutionally permissible disclosure of contributions and expenditures designed to influence the outcome of federal elections, so voters will have complete and timely information on which to make informed decisions.

(CFR requires Web access to donations and donors DONE)

Promote Fair, Balanced, Constitutional Approach: President Bush believes reform should not favor any one party over another or incumbents over challengers. Both corporations and unions should be prohibited from giving soft money to political parties, and both corporations and unions should have to obtain permission from their stockholders or dues-paying workers before spending treasury funds or dues on politics. President Bush supports including a non-sever ability( defeated) provision, so if any provision of the bill is found unconstitutional, the entire bill is sent back to Congress for further adjustments and deliberations. This provision will ensure fair and balanced campaign finance reform

(Unions now under same restrictions as corporations…. DONE)

134 posted on 03/22/2002 6:53:09 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle
I will check on that one...unless you have the exact law to post here. I do not believe that is actually a law here though.
135 posted on 03/22/2002 6:53:15 PM PST by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle
Well, if that law is true, one could make a very good Constitutional argument against it.
136 posted on 03/22/2002 6:54:21 PM PST by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Ahban
How does that square with banning such groups from TV and Radio political ads at least a month before an election?

Because they are not.

137 posted on 03/22/2002 6:54:26 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Read the article, and JR's follow up.

Lie #2: When he took his oath of office, vs his acknowledgement of Constitutional problems with the legislation.

Or maybe you think that's just a 'little white lie'.

138 posted on 03/22/2002 6:55:03 PM PST by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78;Dane
I agree with both of you and appreciate your posts.
I support GW 100%, I do not agree with him on a lot of issues....why am I so loyal to him....he is my hubby's(and now my son's) Commander In Chief who they trust with their lives and respect.
You all can complain about how you think GW lied, took the rat's issues.....but believe me, I have greater concerns right now....the men and women in our military.....if GW is not re-elected in 2004, God help us all...our military will be so discouraged and let down once again by the American people.

btw....please say a short prayer for my son Jonathan who is in basic now.....Im just a worried mom!

139 posted on 03/22/2002 6:59:42 PM PST by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
Court Nixes Bush Executive Order On Unions

Executive Orders A Blueprint for Dictatorship

The Impact of Executive Orders on the Legislative Process

CLINTON CRANKS OUT LAST-MINUTE EXECUTIVE ORDERS

Bush Reluctant to undo Clinton Executive Orders

Challenge to Bush's new secrecy order - Executive Order

Executive power grab on tap at White House

Blasting Bush's record

"Help is on the Way"

140 posted on 03/22/2002 7:02:50 PM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-238 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson