Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun control advocate may have violated gun laws
Kentucky.com ^ | Thu, Mar. 21, 2002 | Timothy J. Burger

Posted on 03/22/2002 8:07:56 AM PST by Inspector Harry Callahan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-186 next last
To: rllngrk33
I believe the question is not about federal law, but state law. State law requires to provide the information on the person the gift is for. She did not do that.

Now, as others have pointed out, if she is not a resident of Delaware, then even more laws have been broken. I have no idea where she lives.

121 posted on 03/22/2002 10:16:11 AM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Sarah's son is referred to as both James Jr and Scott in the article.

D'oh!! Indeed he is. Bet he's now also know as "Mom's Major Embarrassment".

122 posted on 03/22/2002 10:18:47 AM PST by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: rllngrk33
See post 108.
123 posted on 03/22/2002 10:19:21 AM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
That angle reminds me of Tom Mauser, who said that a few days before his son Danel was killed at Columbine, he said, 'Dad, did you know there's a gun show loophole?'... Thing is, it took Tom a year and a half to 'remember' this little tidbit...
124 posted on 03/22/2002 10:20:00 AM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
The BradyCampaign website indicated that the family does live in Delaware, FWIW.
125 posted on 03/22/2002 10:20:50 AM PST by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
Something doesn't pass the smell test I wonder if anybody really checked this out

I'm a little shy about the article. I've been unable to bring it up at the original NY paper site.

126 posted on 03/22/2002 10:31:25 AM PST by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
I'm a little shy about the article. I've been unable to bring it up at the original NY paper site.

It's not the article . That probably is true
I just think Brady made the whole thing up to show she isn't against all guns just evil handguns

Remember guys HCI has a former CIA Disinformation type on their payrolls

Sad when they have to lie to buttress their arguments and don't see the light that they if they have to lie then they are wrong( Course when you are making big $$$$ you ain't gonna bite the hand that is letting you live the good life )
127 posted on 03/22/2002 10:39:29 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
Well, Well, Look at what I found at keepandbeararms.com

The Autobiography of Sarah Brady

by Dr. Michael S. Brown

The name Sarah Brady has become synonymous with gun control. As chair of Handgun Control Inc., she has been an active combatant in America's cultural war over the right of citizens to keep and bear arms.

Her autobiography, "A Good Fight," arrives in bookstores this weekend. While it does not rank with the great biographies, it may be of interest to historians and students who wish to understand the personalities involved in the gun control debate.

It begins with the tragic wounding of her husband, White House Press Secretary Jim Brady, by a lunatic intent on assassinating President Reagan in 1981. Jim Brady's heroic struggle to survive and recover from a crippling head wound is a recurring theme throughout the book along with the family's efforts to cope with the disaster.

Sarah Brady describes her middle-class life before she entered the world of Washington politics. During the mid-1960's she spent two years as a 5th grade teacher in a black neighborhood and she recalls that there was no fear of guns in her school. She did not mention the fact that guns were much more easily available in that era than they are now.

In 1968, she began working for a Republican campaign committee in Washington and began her lifelong involvement in politics. Although her husband was a key Reagan team member, her politics would have to be called Republican in name only. She makes several references to her dissatisfaction with Republican positions on many issues and she seems relieved to report her endorsement of Bill Clinton in the 1992 presidential election.

Her story includes several interesting vignettes of life among Washington's power elite when her husband was a key member of the Reagan administration. Brady did not feel like she belonged in this rarified strata of society, but the reader can sense her outrage when an assassin's bullet pierced the royal cocoon of bodyguards and limousines to unfairly cut short the intoxicating experience.

The important turning point in her life actually occurred a few years after her husband was injured. She describes an incident where her young, hyperactive son picked up a loaded handgun from the seat of a friend's car. Never having been taught about guns, the youngster began to wave it around like a toy. Upon realizing their narrow escape from disaster, something snaps inside Sarah Brady.

A person from a rural area might have decided to teach gun safety classes to families and young people. Brady's background in Washington politics probably explains why she chose to advocate restrictive laws and more government control of society. She instinctively decided to dedicate her life to gun control and soon joined HCI as a spokesperson.

She apparently felt right at home. Her choice of words indicates her complete acceptance of the anti-gun faith. She is always careful to say that people are killed "by" guns rather than with guns, as if guns are beings with minds of their own. She also reveals her lack of knowledge about guns with statements like: "...Saturday Night Specials, which are used almost exclusively for crime."

Brady offers some interesting details about the inner workings of the anti-gun lobby. She portrays them as terribly overmatched by the giant NRA, but deliberately omits the fact that the elite media was universally supportive of the anti-gun movement. This resulted in an essentially level playing field, making for some interesting strategies to change public opinion and influence votes in Congress.

A perfect example is the brilliantly cynical decision to destroy the friendly relationship that had long existed between the NRA and the law enforcement community. The folks at HCI seized on the completely bogus issue of "cop killer bullets" which had never killed a cop, but made a perfect political weapon.

Law enforcement leaders saw it as an important symbolic issue. The NRA saw serious practical problems with the legislation. It also went against their sense of propriety to support a law that accomplished nothing beyond adding another layer to the growing pile of restrictive laws that were bedeviling honest gun owners.

The HCI strategy was a complete success and the rift between the NRA and law enforcement has still not been fully repaired.

Brady discusses the "Assault Weapon Ban" in a way that gives some insight into her thinking. Criminals were never affected by the ban and the firearms industry soon found ways around the law, yet she is still proud of her victory. Apparently what she really cares about is conducting a good fight.

The fact that Brady and her husband suffered in such a public way tended to insulate her from some of the harsh personal attacks that are always part of a bitter public debate. Gun rights activists, who are human too, had some sympathy for Brady and were more comfortable picking on easy targets like Rosie O'Donnell or Bill Clinton.

It is fascinating to find that Brady has nothing but contempt for her opponents. Anyone who disagreed with her is labeled an extremist and Charlton Heston is called a "pompous ass." She also has harsh and insulting words for various members of Congress who did not support her agenda.

When protesters appeared at many of her speaking engagements, she felt an almost overpowering fear for her own safety. By demonizing gun owners, she made them into fearsome monsters that required her to summon up all her courage in order to continue speaking. She does not understand that the last thing the gun rights community wanted was a martyr. She was probably safer surrounded by her enemies than she was on a Washington street where the failure of gun control laws is legend.

An ironic twist occurs late in the story. Her bright, but troublesome son matured into a responsible young man and he wished to receive a hunting rifle for Christmas. At first horrified, Brady decided that her son was a grown man and she wasn't going to let her personal feelings get in the way of giving him what he wanted for Christmas. She writes, "I no longer wanted to play judge and jury" in his life. If only the rest of us were so fortunate.

Her experience at the gun store is priceless. She seems afraid that the gun owners in the shop might turn on her if they discover who she is as the gun dealer calls in her identifying information to request government approval of her purchase. Her feelings are similar to those reported by responsible gun owners who feel they are treated like criminals every time they buy a firearm.

The last major event is the discovery that Brady, a long time smoker, had lung cancer. Being a member of the Washington elite, she of course had access to the latest treatments. But at least in the advance copy of her book, they all appear to have failed.

What is truly fascinating here is to compare her views on cigarettes with the way she blamed guns for her husband's injury. Brady takes full responsibility for her decision to smoke cigarettes throughout her adult life in spite of many warnings, beginning with her father who called them "cancer sticks" before she ever began smoking.

This may the most ironic theme in the book. There is no hint that she blames the tobacco companies for her illness. She does not ask for cigarette users to be licensed. There are no shrill pleas for laws to "save the children" from this terrible scourge which kills far more people than guns. Perhaps she is trying to tell us that controlling yourself can sometimes be more difficult than trying to control others.

Sarah Brady is appearing now on talk shows, promoting her book in the company of sympathetic hosts. You can bet that pro-gun authors would not be accorded the same privilege and you can be certain that she will not notice the double standard.

Like most autobiographies, "A Good Fight" portrays the author in a favorable light and presents her political views in a one-sided way. This reader was left with an impression of Sarah Brady as a tough, quirky and somewhat neurotic mom who had some success imposing her maternal will on a nation.

Dr. Michael S. Brown is an optometrist and member of Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws, www.dsgl.org. He may be contacted at: rkba2000@yahoo.com.

128 posted on 03/22/2002 10:41:30 AM PST by THEUPMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: THEUPMAN
Thanks for saving me from having to buy her book.

30.06?? Hey, isn't that a militay caliber? What is she up to?

129 posted on 03/22/2002 10:50:03 AM PST by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
This article sure is making the rounds. So far it has shown up in an Arizona paper and now it's on Miami.com. It has also been posted to lots of forums around the 'net. Wonder what the link to the New York Daily News version is?
130 posted on 03/22/2002 10:52:33 AM PST by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Well if this story does prove to be true then the question has to be asked how come with all the information about how evil guns are that HER SON still wanted to own one

Sounds like he doesn't believe Mom's BS
131 posted on 03/22/2002 10:55:30 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
This article sure is making the rounds.

I wonder how that is happening? LOL

132 posted on 03/22/2002 10:55:51 AM PST by THEUPMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

Comment #133 Removed by Moderator

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Good find Inspector, not such a dinosaur afterall. Blackbird.
134 posted on 03/22/2002 11:07:19 AM PST by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eugene Tackleberry
You would have thought that with all the extremely knowlegable folks here on FR we wouldn't have seen so many knee-jerk to seek federal charges on a purchase for a gift. Haven't most of us purchased something for a relative recently or received a gift from someone recently? As you've noted, those weren't straw purchases.

Now if I'd bought something with my felon-of-a-bro-in-law's money to give directly to him, that would be a straw purchase.

Of course, I don't believe that any free man should be deprived of arms, so I don't agree with the premise of the straw purchase law anyway.

135 posted on 03/22/2002 11:07:30 AM PST by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: THEUPMAN
Good find!
136 posted on 03/22/2002 11:15:12 AM PST by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
Well, I almost jumped on that bandwagon, too. I thought for sure it was a straw purchase under federal law and the reason I was looking at the the 4473 was so I could quote the BATF and find the cite that shows it was a straw purchase. I was astonished to find that there is an exclusion for "legitimate gifts" to a third party.
137 posted on 03/22/2002 11:16:02 AM PST by Eugene Tackleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
"we wouldn't have seen so many knee-jerk to seek federal charges on a purchase for a gift."

We're at war and I'm going to use every legal way in the world to bring down HCI and Sarah Brady. IFshe didn't fill out the form correctly and it puts her behind bars, I would like to be there to turn the key.

138 posted on 03/22/2002 11:19:52 AM PST by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: dansangel; 45Man
*ping*
139 posted on 03/22/2002 11:31:07 AM PST by kayak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Brady reveals in a new memoir that she bought James Brady Jr. a Remington .30-06, complete with scope and safety lock, at a Lewes, Del., gun shop.

"Scott is not a convicted felon, and he is not prohibited from owning a gun," Stillwell said. "Scott Brady could walk into a store and buy a - he is not a prohibited purchaser."

Who is Scott Brady? Who is James Brady Jr.? Is Sarah purchasing weapons for some other person? There is a law against straw purchases. I think that John Ashcroft should be sending a squad of FBI agents to Sarah Brady's house to arrest her for breaking the law.

Maybe Paul ONeill can order the BATF to make a midnight raid.

140 posted on 03/22/2002 11:53:08 AM PST by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson