It sure is noisy in here!

March 20, 2002 | Texasforever

[gratefulwharffratt]

As for all the squawkers before they look at the facts, I have come to expect them to be like migrating birds that make noise a few days then fly away.

May the four winds blow them safely home.

[RamsNo1]

Hardly a seminar caller, as you put it. I have been on this website for a couple years under my present username and efoley. When I lived in Maryland, I drove down to DC and stood out in front of, then VP Gore's mansion, for 5 hours heckling Gore as Teddy Kennedy and Bob Dole drove by in their limos during the 2000 election controversy. I even had a great conversation with Laura Ingraham on one of those occasions. Go back and check all my previous posts and you will see a person who thoroughly backed this president. I am proud that I voted for Bush but I go to bed tonight thinking that, if I see Bush signing this bill, the retread repubs will have to find a willing illegal alien to replace me in the voting booth. I will also not vote for anyone else including the dumbocraps or the pro-abort libertarians.

[itsahoot]

That is why we have 3 co-equal branches of government and
each branch have their own prerogatives and powers. Ask
yourself why the constitution only allows ONE branch of
government to be made up of Non-elected officials.

Except of course, the congress has the power to amend the
constitution and abolish the supreme court, with the consent
of two thirds of the states of course. The supreme court could
never do the same to congress, so I guess they are not really
co-equal after all. [:-)

[gratefulwharffratt]

Bush is a liar and I will never forgive him. His Dad's "read my lips" moment didn't bother me. He was set up. W is a liar!

I think YOU are a liar.

[GeronL]

I find nothing in the Constitution that says borders cannot be made open by Congress.

[JDGreen123]

Paleo here and proud of it. No "New World Orders" for us, thank you.

[nopardons]

You still don't understand. Only in a parlimenatry form of governance, can a fringe eliment have actual power INSIDE the governing body ! Not that they can't muck up which part wins. Try rereading what I wrote the first time around.

And just WHAT pray tell, did letting a DEM win a seat, that could have been a RINO's do to help ? What message did THAT deliver ? I'll help ya out here ... NONE !

There IS a lessin to learn here. Fringers act as dogs in the manger. They are FRINGE , because not enough peopele share their ideas / positions, and won't . Fringers have a larger population, and take up more space on FR, than even their FR numbers should portend. Out in the real world, they are NOT as numerous. Their behavior, here, does NOT win friends and influence people. Quite the contrary ; they make enemies !

[RamsNo1]

The events took place in the 1700s or the 18th century, OK? Everyone makes mistakes unless you are perfect. I never said I was. I am just expressing my opinion while I am able to. Why don't you express your opinion on a real topic now?!

[RAT Patrol]

Enjoy President Weakling. He serves only as the lesser of evils to me. I don't vote for people who lie to me. It was just because Clinton was a Democrat. Character really does matter to me. Regardless of party.

[Texasforever]

I find nothing in the Constitution that says borders cannot be made open by Congress.

LMAO.

[Texasforever]

Paleo here and proud of it. No "New World Orders" for us, thank you.

Good for you.

[nopardons]

I said : CLOSE TO ", and you even quote me. It is still in te mid to high 70's. Do try to keep up to speed.

Your wishing for his disaster / plummetting of his approval rating, won't make it so.

[Texasforever]

I see little ricky is playing with mom's computer again.

[GeronL]

If the Congress and President vote to open the borders, there is little the courts have the power to do about it. Its not in the jurisdiction of ANY court.

I just vote for people who don't want to open borders.

I concede that the US had open borders for much of its history, like the early days when ships dropped anchor at Boston and Philadelphia and sold their wares on the wharves.

OK, that makes me kinda nostalgic. No red tape free trade... aahh

[gratefulwharffratt]

Enjoy President Weakling.

I will.

I will also expect the amplitude of your shrill seminar caller protestations to increase exponentially after the Republicans take both houses of Congress this November.

Then, I am SURE that you will find YET ANOTHER wedge issue with which to beat our GREAT President over the head.

[itsahoot]

Congress may take things out of the purview of the court. period.

Actually Congress can pass legislation that is not subject to
review by the courts and has done so over 100 times. According
to Bob "B1 Bomber" Dornan.

[nopardons]

I have repeatedly expressed my opinion, on this topic, on this thread. Why don't you pay attention ? Or is it that a couner opinion, to your's, doesn't count ?

The 16th is TWO centuries removed, and almost THREE , from where you stuck the Revolution and the writing of the Constitution. I'd say that that was a far cry from a " little " mistake. And no, I am not " perfect " ; however , I don't make such howling mistakes. If you don't want to be called on them, be more careful what you type. If you don't want to prolong this agony, allow the subject to wither away, by keepng your mouth shut. That's how it works here.

Oh, and DO feel free, to correct me, should I ever make such a dozzy ! : - )

[spunkets]

"issues can be discussed on their merits"

Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech.

Neither Bush, or the members of the 107th Congress that voted for this trash, have any respect for the Bill of Rights. What they are interested in are impressions. They are attempting to create an air of righteousness, minimize the cost and to legitimize their own propaganda tactics in their own campaigns.

These political bozos are responsible for their own campaigns. These laws benefit the politicians and authoritarian interests, not the people. The press is still the leftist propaganda arm of the democratic party, and they're free to operate unencumbered. Those folks that rightfully fear the loss of freedom certain demagogues threaten, are labeled special interests, as if the leftists act in the public interest. The leftists act in their own interests. The leftists even have their own gd NPR/PBS propaganda outlet, 1/2 or more financed by the taxpayer. The rest is financed by tax free leftist orgs. Some of those are even subsidized with tax dollars.

[RAT Patrol]

Bash all you want, I don't care. You cannot reelect him without all of us on FR. The vote was very close. REMEMBER?

I will vote for the lesser of evils, but no money this time. I guess so what about the advertisements because what they say doesn't match what they do anyway.

[nopardons]

Obviously, as are several others.