For the record, HJ, I could give a freekin' flyin' rat's boody what type of sex the VD's prefer. And as far as evidence, the evidence is still inconclusive. Until ownership of the blood DNA excludes everyone but Danielle, and DNA on Danielle proves BEYOND A DOUBT whodunnit, until then, doubts and suspicion overwhelm the "evidence".
How do you think DW got Danielle out of the house?
What vehicle did he transport her in?
Why isn't his DNA in the VD house?
Like I said, I don't necessarily believe he is innocent, but I sure can't understand how he could get her out of her house unless the parents were TOTALLY wasted. Damon heard the dog whine so ...
My tin foil hat hasn't revealed to me the answers to those questions, and they seem to be crucial to his being convicted as guilty.
Either O'Reilly or Hannity asked the other night "What should we do with pedophiles?"
I say castrate them and gouge their eyes out! I want the guilty person to suffer as much as Danielle did.
The blood spots both in the camper and on the jacket make me very suspicious, too. But they are undated. And it isn't lunacy to speculate that a little girl that age would want to have a look inside the camper when it was parked so near her house on so many occasions. Add to that that the little girl bit her nails and was at the loose-tooth stage, might have scratched herself climbing into the camper, and little spatters of blood are not that impossible.
Moreover, as I understand it, the "further testing" of the blood spots involved matching the DNA found in the blood spots to created DNA from Damon and Brenda, proving that the blood was "from an offspring of Damon and Brenda." Danielle has two brothers. There is clear proof that Danielle was, at some time, in the camper, however: her fingerprint found on a cabinet in the camper. This also proves she was alive when in the camper. It doesn't prove when she was there.
I know some people are hung up on the parents' sex lives. I've never posted about that, myself.
Yes, some wild theories have been posted. But many theories on how DW did it have their share of lunacy as well.
Again, if there is fibre or DNA evidence of DW in the VD house, or at Dehesa, or on the body, I'll be convinced he's guilty. Also guilty if they find lint from Danielle's PJs in DW's house house or SUV or camper. (There's that convenient pair of identical PJs to which they can match lint.)