Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wonders
Unlike those innocents released by DNA evidence, it is DNA that is the strongest against this guy. Girls Blood both in his camper and on his Jacket. Scratches on his arms when he returns from weekend camping trip... etc etc. too many coincidences.. My biggest issue is not that maybe this guy didn't do it... which I believe the evidence is overwhelmingly pointing to.. .but the sheer lunacy of the "alternatives" some here are putting forward. Their parents did it, or covered it up, or their guests did it etc etc... its like watching a Clinton spinmeister on full alert! Some people here are just so hung up on the sex lives on the parents that they ignore the evidence right in front of there faces.
504 posted on 03/21/2002 7:15:41 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies ]


To: HamiltonJay
Some people here are just so hung up on the sex lives on the parents that they ignore the evidence right in front of there faces.

Touché'....some people are so quick to forgive and be tolerant-chic, that they refuse to face the obvious.

Brenda, Damon, Barb, Rich, Denise and Keith were IN THE HOUSE the night Danielle disappeared.

Confirmed that they were using illegal drugs.

Confirmed that they were uniamorous (!)

Confirmed that the SEXTET were arriving and departing the VD home, while alarm lights were "by their description" going on and off.

Yeah, lot's of evidence IS BEING IGNORED.....


512 posted on 03/21/2002 7:23:29 AM PST by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies ]

To: HamiltonJay
Some people here are just so hung up on the sex lives on the parents that they ignore the evidence right in front of there faces.

For the record, HJ, I could give a freekin' flyin' rat's boody what type of sex the VD's prefer. And as far as evidence, the evidence is still inconclusive. Until ownership of the blood DNA excludes everyone but Danielle, and DNA on Danielle proves BEYOND A DOUBT whodunnit, until then, doubts and suspicion overwhelm the "evidence".

515 posted on 03/21/2002 7:25:59 AM PST by fivecatsandadog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies ]

To: HamiltonJay
OK....

How do you think DW got Danielle out of the house?

What vehicle did he transport her in?

Why isn't his DNA in the VD house?

Like I said, I don't necessarily believe he is innocent, but I sure can't understand how he could get her out of her house unless the parents were TOTALLY wasted. Damon heard the dog whine so ...

My tin foil hat hasn't revealed to me the answers to those questions, and they seem to be crucial to his being convicted as guilty.

Either O'Reilly or Hannity asked the other night "What should we do with pedophiles?"

I say castrate them and gouge their eyes out! I want the guilty person to suffer as much as Danielle did.

516 posted on 03/21/2002 7:26:06 AM PST by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies ]

To: HamiltonJay
It is getting tiresome hearing that one note. Just because we question the media version of events does not mean we are 'hung up' on the swinging life style. Can you get that?
530 posted on 03/21/2002 7:59:31 AM PST by fnord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies ]

To: HamiltonJay
Ref your #504: I agree there are several things which point to DW's guilt. I'm not sure it's all that unusual to come back from a camping trip with scratches. I've got my share of them while camping. Still, the scratches do look suspicious. If the scratches were made by Danielle, they'll find DW's DNA under her nails, and then, LOCK, he's guilty for sure.

The blood spots both in the camper and on the jacket make me very suspicious, too. But they are undated. And it isn't lunacy to speculate that a little girl that age would want to have a look inside the camper when it was parked so near her house on so many occasions. Add to that that the little girl bit her nails and was at the loose-tooth stage, might have scratched herself climbing into the camper, and little spatters of blood are not that impossible.

Moreover, as I understand it, the "further testing" of the blood spots involved matching the DNA found in the blood spots to created DNA from Damon and Brenda, proving that the blood was "from an offspring of Damon and Brenda." Danielle has two brothers. There is clear proof that Danielle was, at some time, in the camper, however: her fingerprint found on a cabinet in the camper. This also proves she was alive when in the camper. It doesn't prove when she was there.

I know some people are hung up on the parents' sex lives. I've never posted about that, myself.

Yes, some wild theories have been posted. But many theories on how DW did it have their share of lunacy as well.

Again, if there is fibre or DNA evidence of DW in the VD house, or at Dehesa, or on the body, I'll be convinced he's guilty. Also guilty if they find lint from Danielle's PJs in DW's house house or SUV or camper. (There's that convenient pair of identical PJs to which they can match lint.)

553 posted on 03/21/2002 9:08:37 AM PST by wonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson