Sheriff says 'gun nut' concealing the truth

Tri-Valley Herald ^ | 17 March 2002 | Dwight King-Leatham

[45Auto]

Jim March is a self-described "gun nut," frustrated because the Contra Costa County Sheriff's office won't give him a concealed-weapons permit.

The towering redhead from Pittsburg has taken his beef with the sheriff over the permit to federal court, saying county Sheriff Warren Rupf and a few police chiefs in 2000 violated his constitutional rights.

[1L]

We were saying 'dork' in the early fifties.

And the 70's, and the '80s, and the '90s. What on earth is your point?

[Cultural Jihad]

Join the Libertarian revolt, tovarich!

[tpaine]

You have established no REASON for your silly charges against libertarians, Mr. Mitty. -- Just some lame personal anecdotes. -- Please, give us more laughs.

[tpaine]

Ask texaggie. -- He claims I'm to old to use the term, for some weird reason. -- And please, do tell us why it concerns you.

[Texaggie79]

It called common sense...

[tpaine]

Posting pics of your jihadic leader wrapped in a U.S, flag is sicko, obsessive behavior CJ.

- I know, -- you don't care. -- And can't stop, in any case.

[tpaine]

Those aren't libertarians you picture. They are sickos, exactly like you & CJ. Raving loonies.

[Texaggie79]

Many register LP and vote LP. They are part of the LP. Sure I would like to say that the likes of McCain and Lott are not Republicans, they are rinos, but that is not fact.

[arm958]

"He's one of those people who once he grabs onto a fact, he builds a fantasy around that," said Sheriff Warren Rupf.

Translation: "That bastard uncovered my cozy little world of corruption and he's going to pay".

[tpaine]

So? -- You have a real point to this ceaseless irrational 'hate on' that you have for libertarianism? -- Simply put, we work for a return to original constitutional values, as per JR's vision for this site.

Why do you attack us?

[Texaggie79]

Why do you attack us?

I only attack those that go beyond the Constitution and claim that there is some restriction on States prohibiting drugs.

[Stew Padasso]

So you have PROOF that the only reason people work within the LP is because they are drug users?

[Teacher317]

o

[Texaggie79]

So you have PROOF that the only reason people work within the LP is because they are drug users?

I NEVER SAID THAT. I said some of them. And that is undeniable.

[tpaine]

If states have a constitutional 'right' to prohibit drugs, it follows they can use the same power to prohibit anything, including guns.

You cannot refute this logic, & have never even tried to do so.

Nows your chance. - Do it.

[Texaggie79]

If states have a constitutional 'right' to prohibit drugs, it follows they can use the same power to prohibit anything, including guns.

They have the power to prohibit that which is not restricted by the USC, and that would rule out guns.

[Teacher317]

They are also part of the GOP and the liberal Left. What does that have to do with anything? Should they be removed from the voting rolls? Should the GOP refuse every vote from anyone who has ever done illegal substances?

Your obsessive-compulsive postings on the LP are really disruptive. This thread could have been a great RKBA discussion, but you have some psychotic need to redirect it to your own topic. It's really annoying. Please stop. Save the LP stuff for the LP threads at the very least, okay?

(BTW, you were whining that you were in the minority on those threads... do you not see the strong probability that this would be a indicator that you just might be WRONG?!? I've learned many things on FR, and have been corrected several times. It's a sign of maturity to accept critiques, and to update your knowledge base. You seem more interested in shouting matches, half-truths, and converting as many threads as possible to LP debates.)

[Stew Padasso]

From your first post on this thread (most often your first post is intended to provoke and smear) - "Can you not even have the dignity to admit that many in the LP are drug users and that is the main reason they choose to be Libertarian?"

Then once you are called out, you come back with - "I NEVER SAID THAT. I said some of them. And that is undeniable."

How does this jive? "Many in the LP are drug users" and the "main reason." I guess many and some mean the some?

Are you just looking for attention?

[Texaggie79]

Either you have yet to get the "holier than thou" attitude of Libertarians, or you have taken on the attitude yourself. Your pick

[Texaggie79]

It DOES jive. Many in the LP are there because they want drugs legalized, because they want to do them. Not all, not every, not most.