Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutors 'Seriously Considering' Case Against Russell Yates (Negligent Homicide)
ABC News ^ | March 16, 2002 SGT | Elenn Davis and Mike von Fremd

Posted on 03/16/2002 7:41:28 AM PST by codebreaker

Prosecutors will weigh a number of factors that may lead them to prosecute Andrea Yates husband Russell for either child endangerment or negligent homicide. ABC News has learned.

No decision has been made, but it is being seriously considered, sources said. Prosecutors would charge Russell Yates if an when the evidence warrants, but do not have the evidence now, sources said.

Andrea Yates 37, was convicted Tuesday of two capital murder charges filed in the killings of her children last June.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: charges; father; homicide; yates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 381-395 next last
To: Righter-than-Rush
Yes and if it had been my wife, the woman I pledged before God to love and care for in sickness and in health, the mother of my children, the love of my life, the fact that the HMO wouldn't allow it wouldn't have stopped me from throwing the biggest conniption fit to anyone who listened to me ... the press LOVES to write or broadcast stories about junk like that ... until I got proper treatment for my wife. Just saying "Oops, sorry, HMO won't cover it" doesn't fly. If my wife were that obviously sick, I'd move heaven and earth to the point of putting another mortgage on my house to get her help. All he was probably interested in was how soon he could plant his seed in her again.
81 posted on 03/16/2002 8:54:19 AM PST by GB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: cactusSharp
you people kill me....opinions out the wazooo...so let me ask this of you brainiacs.....name the 3 drugs she was taking and their results if stopped and what does sugar do to the mix? when you all can ACCURATELY answer,you will all be humbled as to what REALLY HAPPENED.....I hold my head in shame as to you all.....

The REAL ANSWER isn't what she was taking, but the fact that they kept her from killing people WHEN SHE WAS ON IT!!!!! She became a murderous whore when she STOPPED taking the medication! And he husband KNEW she wasn't taking it and WAS WARNED NOT TO TAKE HER OFF OF IT!

As for what evidence the DA needs, man I don't get this one. 5 counts of child endangerment is definately there. He asked for his mothers help. If she was a great mom, why would he have done that? Then I'd lay on emotional cruelty and criminal neglect and child abandonment in the hands of a mentally unstable person. How many manically depressed babysitters do you let watch your children! Russell Yates is the real peice of crap in this whole mess! A classic psochiopath!

82 posted on 03/16/2002 8:55:01 AM PST by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zviadist
Whew! What a thread. But at least I'm getting a clearer picture of a "conservative" in modern America.

1.)Conservatives, in spite of their protestations to the contrary, think that what they see on TV is real!

2.)And this one, hardest of all to believe--many seem to believe that a court proceeding is a search for the Truth!!!

3.) A disturbingly significant portion of Freepers fantasize about men being raped in prison.

4.) Many conservatives have apparently embraced feminist dogma when it comes to women. They believe, like all good testicle-carrying gender feminists, that women are permanent, crippled two-year olds and cannot be held responsible for anything they do. And...

5.)...conversely, that men are demon gods who know all, see all, cause all, and, if they don't, are just losers and should go to prison anyway. In fact 70% of men should be put in prison on general principles. 30% must remain outside--temporarily--so they can rush into collapsing buidings and dig ditches and hold down the outposts of the Empire and so on.

83 posted on 03/16/2002 8:55:33 AM PST by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
A parent's first obligation is NOT to his/her children. It is to their spouse.

See my post above. Until you live with someone with a severe mental illness, I strongly suggest that you refrain from judgment of those who do.

84 posted on 03/16/2002 8:56:41 AM PST by NevadaY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: LaBelleDameSansMerci
What in the wide world of sports are you talking about?
85 posted on 03/16/2002 8:58:20 AM PST by GB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Zviadist
"...who believe that children are a gift from God, not an inconvenience to be killed without hesitation."

Yep, these "traditional" folks sure considered these kids a gift, all right. I wonder how much of a gift she thought they were as she forced them under the water?

Traditional? I don't think so. I don't know of any "tradtitional" families who kill their own kids.

86 posted on 03/16/2002 8:59:56 AM PST by Ulysses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LaBelleDameSansMerci
Are you this much fun on a date too?
87 posted on 03/16/2002 9:02:23 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: NevadaY
I disagree with your blanket statement that a parent's first obligation is always to his or her spouse. There are times ... not all the time, but times ... when the children's needs must take precedence over the parents' needs/wants/desires, etc.
88 posted on 03/16/2002 9:02:36 AM PST by GB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: NevadaY
See my post above. Until you live with someone with a severe mental illness, I strongly suggest that you refrain from judgment of those who do.

FYI, I have. And what I'd really like to say to you, would surely get deleted from the thread.

Stop shifting the blame. Those of us who have cared for family members who are mentally ill do know what it takes, but we also have to recognize (obviously you do NOT) that when those family members are a danger to themselves or others, we have obligations to protect others, or society as the case may be.

That's the reality.

Russel Yates *knew* what his wife would be capable of doing. He sat by and did NOTHING. He's culpable. Get over it.

And don't reply to me further. I have no interest in debating someone like you. You have a victim mentality that frankly, grates on my nerves.

89 posted on 03/16/2002 9:02:52 AM PST by usconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
these prosecutors should ,collectively, go sit on a
sharp stick
90 posted on 03/16/2002 9:02:57 AM PST by jwatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
The father knew of the long history of mental illness and what she is capable of, a second opinion was definitely called for.

Leaving her alone with no medication is neglience at the very least.

91 posted on 03/16/2002 9:03:08 AM PST by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: NevadaY
Our beef is not with people who have mental illness or the families who care for them-that's the operative phrase-their families cared for them. Our point is that the husband did not exercise proper care with his wife. Can't you see our frustration with his lack of appropriate care for his ill wife?? I am sure that many of us here, have had personal experiences with family members who have had psychiatric disorders and we have gone to the ends of the earth, to keep them and the rest of our family safe. Rusty couldn't seem to go to the end of the block, to keep his family safe.
92 posted on 03/16/2002 9:03:31 AM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: rintense
No, are you?

Not, but you seem to relish homosexual practices.

93 posted on 03/16/2002 9:03:44 AM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: NevadaY
Actually as a parent my first duty is to God, then my Spouse and Family...
94 posted on 03/16/2002 9:05:06 AM PST by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: NevadaY
The morons on this thread calling for this guy to go to jail have obviously never had the unfortunate opportunity to care for a loved one who has a serious mental illness. I for one have.

So what! Was it your wife? Did you continually impregnate her up after she was diagnosed as mentally ya-ya? We're not talking about your parents or children or siblings or relatives, we are talking about a spouse who only concern in life was to knock up his wife even after being diagnosed as being a manic depressive, and then have her take care of 5 kids, (one being a baby) 24/7 including home-schooling!

You may have an argument of "I took care of a mental person so you don't know what your talking about" argument, but try taking care of 4 boys and a baby when your mentally straight and imagine putting the person you took care of in the same situation. Then tell all of us here Russell Yates isn't culpable!!

95 posted on 03/16/2002 9:05:24 AM PST by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: NevadaY
You fools are not in the least bit aware of what it is you're crying for.

Together maybe we will educate a few of them.

96 posted on 03/16/2002 9:06:26 AM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
"...Russell Yates is the real peice of crap in this whole mess!..."

I'll bet lawyers fight to get you on their juries. Americanus Oprahsilicus

97 posted on 03/16/2002 9:07:26 AM PST by LaBelleDameSansMerci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: rintense;all
One thing that struck me as odd, during the whole trial Russell and the WHOLE family testified that Andrea was mentally ill, but they allowed her to care for the children.
I know that the grandmother helped but she wasn't due at the house til 9am, that left Andrea 1 hour alone with her kids....a fatal mistake.

Now common sense tells me that if I thought someone was so ill, he/she shouldn't be left alone for any length of time with children....I think there is enough blame to go around for the whole family.

98 posted on 03/16/2002 9:08:02 AM PST by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Ulysses
I don't know of any "tradtitional" families who kill their own kids.

Unless they do abortion.

99 posted on 03/16/2002 9:08:58 AM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: LaBelleDameSansMerci
I'll bet lawyers fight to get you on their juries. Americanus Oprahsilicus

Actually they look for sympathetic saps like you that will blame everything in the world but yourself! I believe that a mans job in life is to take care of his wife and Children. Russell Yates not only did not do that, but compounded the problem, ignored the demons and allowed his children to be murdered. But what the hell do I know. Why don't you tell me how many manic depressives you have as babysitters and set me straight?

100 posted on 03/16/2002 9:10:54 AM PST by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 381-395 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson