Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Be Afraid, Very Afraid (North Korea Has Nukes, Long-range Missles)
National Review Online ^ | Mar 14, 2002 | Rich Lowry

Posted on 03/14/2002 8:04:12 AM PST by My Identity

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last
Comment #81 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Jade
Donald Rumsfeld didn't seem to think that this "Agreed Framework" was such a bad deal

Apparently you didn't read the history. The ABB nukes are light water reactors which are considered safer by the U.S. The problem is with NK's old heavy water reactor.

The problem with the Carter/Clinton agreement is that it only postponed the day of reckoning. In essence, the KorComms didn't have to do anything but sit tight for several years and they got two light water reactors. They did not have to shut down their old reactor, but only had to say that they did. Clinton bought them off for $6Bil and solved no U.S. problm but his own.

Pardon me, but your comments sound like hysterical world conspiracy tin-foil comments.
82 posted on 03/22/2002 7:01:28 AM PST by My Identity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

Comment #83 Removed by Moderator

Comment #84 Removed by Moderator

To: My Identity, Black Jade, sonofliberty2
Apparently you didn't read the history. The ABB nukes are light water reactors which are considered safer by the U.S. The problem is with NK's old heavy water reactor. The problem with the Carter/Clinton agreement is that it only postponed the day of reckoning. In essence, the KorComms didn't have to do anything but sit tight for several years and they got two light water reactors. They did not have to shut down their old reactor, but only had to say that they did. Clinton bought them off for $6Bil and solved no U.S. problm but his own.

Actually, the House Republican Policy Caucus quoted expert testimony that said the light water reactors we were supposed to build them would enable the DPRK to build some 60 nukes per year using Plutonium 238 which would have been a pretty sad state of affairs for the US. Fortunately, after some vacillitation, it looks like Bush is not going to let the Japs/ROK build them and that the Russians will likely end up building a new nuclear reactor for the North Koreans instead.
85 posted on 03/29/2002 9:20:10 AM PST by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: My Identity
Be very, very afraid!
86 posted on 03/29/2002 9:25:14 AM PST by Icthus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Identity

Be VERY afraid!

87 posted on 03/29/2002 10:13:52 AM PST by Icthus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
The USFJ already have nukes deployed in Japan, despite what the treaty and Japanese Constitution says. everyone knows this, looks the otherway, and further, not a few people know right where they are.
88 posted on 03/29/2002 10:16:52 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #89 Removed by Moderator

To: sushiman
. This island has already experienced the A-bomb

I was 2 years old then. My uncle flew over Hiroshima the day after, good view from the tailgun position. He doesn't talk much about it, except to say the devastation was immense. Considering that few such bombs are that small these days, I hope that cooler heads prevail and they never get used again.

90 posted on 04/03/2002 9:10:20 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: My Identity
My challenge North Korea is that they don't have the guts to aim a missle at Berkley. Go ahead, I dare you.
91 posted on 04/03/2002 9:15:26 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
3. Hot subs. And I don't mean from Quizno's.
92 posted on 04/03/2002 9:21:55 PM PST by Pistias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Comment #93 Removed by Moderator

To: My Identity
I am not afraid of N. Korea. I don't care how many nukes they have. They don't have the will to use them. All they have is the willingness to threaten - that's it!
94 posted on 04/03/2002 9:25:28 PM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #95 Removed by Moderator

To: INSENSITIVE GUY
We have enough to blow North Korea to kingdom come we need a missle defense.
96 posted on 04/03/2002 10:03:19 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
bump
97 posted on 04/04/2002 7:04:24 AM PST by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied; RCW2001; Black Jade; Alouette; backhoe; goldilucky; flamefront
bttt
98 posted on 04/05/2002 11:28:05 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Some won't pay attention until we get hit by one.
99 posted on 04/05/2002 12:20:45 PM PST by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied; Doug from Upland; backhoe; goldilucky
"Some won't pay attention until we get hit by one."

Exactly.

100 posted on 04/05/2002 1:39:27 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson