Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tancredo doubts he can block amnesty-extension bill
Denver Post ^ | March 8, 2002 | Bill McAllister

Posted on 03/08/2002 1:24:33 PM PST by sarcasm

Friday, March 08, 2002 - WASHINGTON - Rep. Tom Tancredo takes credit for thwarting the Bush administration's last effort to offer partial amnesty to thousands of illegal residents, but Thursday the outspoken immigration foe said he may have been outmaneuvered by the White House.

President Bush has struck a deal with the House leadership to place legislation that offers an extension of amnesty on its consent calendar before Bush heads to Mexico for a state visit next week, the Colorado Republican said.

That action should ensure quick House passage of legislation that Bush has repeatedly sought from Congress. It would allow an undocumented person to receive legal standing, such as a valid green card, by filing a declaration with the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

It presumably also would require the person to have been in the United States by a certain date and have filed a declaration with the INS from an appropriate sponsor, such as a relative or employer, and pay a $1,000 penalty.

"The terms are still up in the air," said Dan Stein, executive director of the Federation for American Immigration, a group that has been allied with Tancredo. "We've heard to the effect that the president wants something to bring down to Mexico."

The initial Bush proposal, designed exclusively for Mexicans, once was high on the president's legislative wish list, but it was delayed after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11. However, as the president noted Wednesday in a speech to the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, he now is pushing for the extension of the amnesty program known by the section of immigration law that covers it, Section 245I.

The president hailed it as a way to reunite family, separated by the border. "If you believe in family values, if you understand the worth of family and the importance of family, let's get 245I out of the United States Congress and give me a chance to sign it," Bush told the chamber members.

Tancredo, the head of a congressional caucus on immigration issues and proponent of halting virtually all immigration, said he had blocked a previous attempt by Bush to push an extension of the amnesty program through the House. But this time, he said House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., had agreed to place the issue on the suspension, or consent, calendar, making it difficult to defeat the proposal.

The Senate might be more favorable to the bill than the House, expanding the numbers of individuals who can apply, Tancredo said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: freetrade; hughhewitt; immigrantlist; nwo; terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 2,941-2,945 next last
To: Reaganwuzthebest
We've never been asked if we agree to mass immigration. And they never will. They know what the answer would be.

They know what the answer IS. Those people in Washington read the polls and they know exactly what our thoughts are. All of the major polls show that approximately 80% of the population want less immigration and tighter borders.

They also get reports from their staffs about phone calls, FAX's, emails; etc. They are blindly going against the will of the American people on this one!!

741 posted on 03/09/2002 6:06:24 PM PST by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies]

To: Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
Henry Kissinger in an address to the Bilderberg Organization meeting at Evian, France, May 21, 1992 said the following as transcribed from a tape recording made by one of the Swiss delegates:

"Today American's would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government."

742 posted on 03/09/2002 6:07:10 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 727 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Hey, what happened to Dane. I was really enjoying all of Dane's stories about the highly skilled illegal alien lettuce pickers and how they are so indispensable to the survival of the United States as the world's only superpower. If I remember correctly, didn't the Roman empire fall because of a lack of highly skilled illegal alien lettuce pickers?
743 posted on 03/09/2002 6:23:32 PM PST by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HennepinPrisoner
My family is a bunch of Democrats so they are gloating with glee at my displeasure for Bush, but at the same time they are against "guest worker" (read: Amnesty-Step 1) as well.

One of my best friends is a Democrat, and he is dead set against amnesty as well. Like your family, he is loving the fact I am disillusioned with Bush.

Bush was the lesser of two evils back in 2000, but no way will I ever vote for him again. Like others, I'll write in some celebrity crackpot's name before I'll vote for him again.

744 posted on 03/09/2002 6:24:44 PM PST by dougherty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 716 | View Replies]

To: usadave
Hey, what happened to Dane. I was really enjoying all of Dane's stories about the highly skilled illegal alien lettuce pickers and how they are so indispensable to the survival of the United States as the world's only superpower. If I remember correctly, didn't the Roman empire fall because of a lack of highly skilled illegal alien lettuce pickers?

Yes; I believe they called them "slaves". The Romans never could find enough of them.

745 posted on 03/09/2002 6:29:16 PM PST by Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies]

To: PRS
That's better than your first one, lol. Keep 'em coming.
746 posted on 03/09/2002 6:29:37 PM PST by dougherty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 728 | View Replies]

To: PRS
LOL...BTTT!
747 posted on 03/09/2002 6:31:12 PM PST by HennepinPrisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 728 | View Replies]

To: Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the 'RIGHT MAJOR CRISES' and the nations will accept the New World Order." -David Rockefeller.

Sorry, no date noted. But that quote was brought out at LEAST 10 years ago.

The "Right Major Crisis" seems to have happened.

748 posted on 03/09/2002 6:32:13 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 745 | View Replies]

To: usadave
He's probably busy talking to his masters at the RNC. It seems that their latest fax of "talking points" isn't working with the disenchanted peons.
749 posted on 03/09/2002 6:32:13 PM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies]

Comment #750 Removed by Moderator

To: VA Advogado
Not until the 14th amendment was enacted without ratification has anything other than establishing a uniform rule for naturalization been the business of the feds in the area of immigration. Also, states reserve the power to determine who is eligible for state licenses. Show me in the Constitution where any such power is relinquished by the states.

State driver's licensing requirements have diddly to do with immigration. Don't embarass yourself by trying to pretend you have even a nodding acquaintance with the US Constitution.

For an avogado, you're awfully uninformed. Of course, you're what passes for a lawyer in Mexico, aren't you? You're not an American and never could be. Bugger off and go play with your fellow communists.

751 posted on 03/09/2002 6:33:23 PM PST by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: Vallandigham
That's a real impressive list you have there. Now who are you proposing to put into office to cure the problem?
752 posted on 03/09/2002 6:35:30 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 750 | View Replies]

To: usadave
If I remember correctly, didn't the Roman empire fall because of a lack of highly skilled illegal alien lettuce pickers?

That would be correct. Without them, we're all doomed.

753 posted on 03/09/2002 6:36:06 PM PST by dougherty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies]

To: Vallandigham
Send the thread to every Republican we can think of.forget the WH the fix is in there!
754 posted on 03/09/2002 6:37:03 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 750 | View Replies]

To: Joaquin
These guys might be worth a look: Constitution Party. Take a look at the immigration plank of their platform.

I just did and agree with every word of it. I'll have to take a look at their stance on other issues, however, but for now I would definitely vote for the Constitution Party before a "pro-illegal immigrant" Republican candidate.

755 posted on 03/09/2002 6:37:12 PM PST by HennepinPrisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies]

To: Brownie74
They also get reports from their staffs about phone calls, FAX's, emails; etc. They are blindly going against the will of the American people on this one!!

No doubt about that. They're all acting like the terminator on this issue. They're programmed to react a certain way, and they don't stop till mission accomplished.

Tom Tancredo in 2004 anyone??

756 posted on 03/09/2002 6:38:25 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 741 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
That's a real impressive list you have there. Now who are you proposing to put into office to cure the problem?

I propose a Pauline Hanson type candidate to wake up the Republicans. It worked in Australia. The Labour Party, last year, adopted Pauline Hanson's One Nation's stance on illegal immigration and won the election. If it were not for One Nation being a political threat to Labour, they would never have taken the strong stance against economic "boat immigrants" that they did beginning last summer.

757 posted on 03/09/2002 6:41:45 PM PST by HennepinPrisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 752 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Tom Tancredo in 2004 anyone??

Sounds good to me. Unlike Dubya, Tancredo seems to care about this country and how we feel as well. Down with Bush! Give Me Tancredo!

758 posted on 03/09/2002 6:42:06 PM PST by dougherty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 756 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
The next item that these very same disillusioned Bush Supporters must face, like it or not, believe it or not, is One World Governance.

Yeah,I know. This is what I've been saying for a while now. What Bubba-2 is setting the stage for is a new super-state called the "North American Union",and for his half-Cuban nephew (George "The Latino" Bush) to be elected the first president of it.

759 posted on 03/09/2002 6:42:08 PM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 718 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Think that this speech by Tancredo is worth posting? I tried earlier and I couldn't get it for format properly.
760 posted on 03/09/2002 6:47:05 PM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 756 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 2,941-2,945 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson