[Quila]

One thing that just now hit me. The article's title is "A Second Mathematical Proof Against Evolution ...". This is in no way a mathematical proof, merely an argument using math. This shows to the core that the people involved don't really know how to properly apply math.

[mlo]

This shows to the core that the people involved don't really know how to properly apply math.

That has been apparent all along.

[Southack]

"This is in no way a mathematical proof, merely an argument using math. This shows to the core that the people involved don't really know how to properly apply math." - Quila

Oh please. You've just lowered yourself to claiming that arguing semantics will show to the core of an argument's misapplication.

That goes beyond sad...