[Southack]

"This is in no way a mathematical proof, merely an argument using math. This shows to the core that the people involved don't really know how to properly apply math." - Quila

Oh please. You've just lowered yourself to claiming that arguing semantics will show to the core of an argument's misapplication.

That goes beyond sad...

[mlo]

What semantics? It's been explained to you all along that your mathematical arguments is worthless. You've even accepted the basis that makes it worthless. You just don't want to give up the argument, even if it is a false one.

[Quila]

Oh please. You've just lowered yourself to claiming that arguing semantics will show to the core of an argument's misapplication.

When someone bases his arguments on math and calls it a proof, I expect a proof somewhere in there. It may be semantics, but it's pretty serious semantics that show a lack of knowledge.