[Physicist]

Your claim for the first life forming without DNA

I made no such claim. I merely demonstrated that the possibility cannot be discounted, and that's sufficient to destroy the author's argument.

is outside that body of evidence.

No more so than the author's claim that the first cell had DNA. Today's cells are not the first cells; I reject that your "body of evidence" is entirely relevant.

[Southack]

"I made no such claim. I merely demonstrated that the possibility cannot be discounted, and that's sufficient to destroy the author's argument." - Physicist

Are you saying that any possibility, even if it has no supporting evidence, is sufficient to destroy any argument?