Either you can show the errors (that you ALREADY claimed exist) in the math for this thread, or else you can't.Nor is it a matter of time, because taking you at your word means that you've already spotted the errors.
Thus, if you don't show those specific errors, it can only mean that you weren't being honest.
I already told you my reasons. Documenting errors (not seeing them, explaining them properly) takes time, and it's not worth doing if your audience isn't going to bother to listen.
Your attempt here to make a flying leap from that observation to a conclusion of calling me dishonest only reinforces my opinion that you're more interested in rhetorical games than actual rational discussion.
Try again.