I already told you my reasons. Documenting errors (not seeing them, explaining them properly) takes time, and it's not worth doing if your audience isn't going to bother to listen.
Your attempt here to make a flying leap from that observation to a conclusion of calling me dishonest only reinforces my opinion that you're more interested in rhetorical games than actual rational discussion.
Try again.
I called your bluff.
You have been dishonest. Contrary to your wild-eyed claims, you physically CAN NOT show a flaw in the math for this thread.
Typical.