Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
"Without knowing the history of earth in detail, anything said about the probabilities of this happening is speculation."

That's incorrect. The specific math involved in calculating probabilities is not speculation.

460 posted on 12/09/2002 12:19:29 PM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
"Without knowing the history of earth in detail, anything said about the probabilities of this happening is speculation."

That's incorrect. The specific math involved in calculating probabilities is not speculation.

But for pete's sake, you can't calculate a valid probability at all until you have a good idea what sort of process you're attempting to mathematically model.

Thus his point.

494 posted on 12/09/2002 3:24:52 PM PST by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies ]

To: Southack
That's incorrect. The specific math involved in calculating probabilities is not speculation.

But Mr. Watson's assumptions ARE speculation, and that's where we all have problems with it. I'm surprised you can't see that.

593 posted on 12/10/2002 1:14:01 PM PST by ThinkPlease
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson