Good ole~ Commiefornia!
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
If only this bicyclist would have had his Mexican ID card w/ him, he ould have been OK.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Oddly enough, in Texas a police officer may not arrest a person for speeding. Any other offense, no matter how minor, is grounds for arrest. Of course, that's not to say he couldn't make something up if he wanted to arrest a speeder...
-bc
5 posted on
03/04/2002 1:46:19 PM PST by
BearCub
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The justices, ruling 6-1, also said the methamphetamine an officer found on McKay after his arrest in Los Angeles County could be used against him in court. McKay was sentenced to nearly three years after pleading guilty to a drug charge.
Outstanding work on behalf of our Los Angeles Leos. Another drug threat off the streets. I wonder who that punk justice was that voted against admitting this legally seized evidence.
Good post!
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
I just heard about someone getting a DUI on a bike here in Talibanifornia. I can't believe this crap.
8 posted on
03/04/2002 2:05:01 PM PST by
Ajnin
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Out here in Kalifornia bicycles are considered vehicles by law, and their operation is governed by the motor vehicle code. A person doesn't have to have a drivers license to operate one, but must obey all laws regarding them. They are very similar to motorcycle laws. Running stop signs, wrong side of street or wrong way on one way street are violations and citable. If a person has committed an offense, he must have ID, or its off to the slammer, untill ID can be verified. The catch is that the cops usually don't bother with bicyclists unless there is an accident or the cyclist tee's of the cop somehow.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK;gubamyster;VA Advogado;ThomasJefferson;Glasser;BearCub;Joe Hadenuf
;
14 posted on
03/04/2002 2:17:05 PM PST by
CFW
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Well then we'll just have to pass a referendum against it.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Good ole~ Commiefornia!Good 'ol US of A!!! Be fair
The high court followed a U.S. Supreme Court decision...
The USSC says it's OK to arrest someone for not having thier seatbelt on!!!!!!Watch out smokers you're next on the arestable offences.
EBUCK
31 posted on
03/04/2002 2:58:03 PM PST by
EBUCK
To: First_Salute
See what I mean?
Why worry about excess of authority when the authorities gets to pick and choose when to assert it -- and with the courts' blessing too?
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
There you go, you smug little bicycle greenies.
Now we are all in the same boat.. It was just a matter of time before they got around to you also.
Now, for all you skeet shooters who say: "Well, assault weapons SHOULD be banned, they serve no good purpose and our sport doesn't hust anyone"
I am putting yall' on notice..
39 posted on
03/04/2002 3:30:21 PM PST by
Jhoffa_
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
"Papesss pleasss."
42 posted on
03/04/2002 3:56:30 PM PST by
IronJack
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
You have to have ID on you just to go biking??? This is insane...
58 posted on
03/04/2002 5:44:07 PM PST by
xm177e2
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
most of the bicyclists there are a bunch of @$$holes anyway.
ever see their antics on 'critical mass' fridays?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson