Posted on 03/04/2002 4:12:08 AM PST by RCW2001
I have personally seen female pilots who were just as good as their male counterparts, and I am one of their biggest defenders. I love my sister Marines just as much as my brothers and have the utmost confidence in them, but I can't say I buy into that statement. 9+ would have anyone heaving and blacking out, if sustained for more than a few seconds.
Wonder if 'shielding policies from scrutiny' includes CFR? B@$t@#ds
True about the RPG and the flare dispenser. Any aircraft is vulnerable if hit in the right place particularly an RPG. If the rotors become unsynchronised that is a huge problem, one which cannot be recovered from. The gearbox won't skip a tooth somewhere, the entire gearbox would explode first.
RCW2001 thank you for the thread about this tragedy.
I have personally seen female pilots who were just as good as their male counterparts, and I am one of their biggest defenders. I love my sister Marines just as much as my brothers and have the utmost confidence in them, but I can't say I buy into that statement. 9+ would have anyone heaving and blacking out, if sustained for more than a few seconds.
It's not quite that simple. Women generally can survive and tolerate more continuous G-force than men, but male pilots can generally continue to perform the duties of pilot better than female pilots following intermittant exposure to high-gee, as in violent aerial maneuvering- dogfighting.
But much also depends on the physical condition of the pilot, the angle of the seat, and currency [recent exposure] to such conditions, just one reason why current flight training is all-important. Female pilots also exhibit less tolerance for g-forces during during menstruation, though some interesting studies suggest that in early stages of pregnancy, their tolerance mat exceed that of most men. But those are all generalizations, and it's the individual's performance that counts, to about the same level as that of an Olympic athlete.
See the article on *the Spin Doctors* from the USAF Airman magazine for additional interesting info, particularly regarding the present generation of G-suits and plans for the forthcoming ATAGS flight suit, and the information *here*.
How do you mean this?
Our guys could leave the
theater of operations
before a Nuke got
dropped on them.
A nuke wouldn't leave
a cave opening left and
even if there was one the
fallout would be theirs
to deal with.
But we're going to lose guys.
...just like the Japanese Marines at Tarawa.
The russian experiance
should have taught us not
to get bogged down in a
conventional action in a land
where everyone wants to
fight everyone else.
Which they did in this case IIRC.
This from Public Law No: 107-40 9-18-2001 (S.J.RES.23 )
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This joint resolution may be cited as the `Authorization for Use of Military Force'.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.
(b) War Powers Resolution Requirements- (1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION- Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.
-- So little Tommy can either try to repeal this law, or sit down and shut up.
Fallout can radiate to any area, depending on the prevailing winds. You don't want to use tactical nukes in a situation in which conventional means are both tactically and politically of greater benefit.
You don't want to kill a bunch of innocent Afghans when you're trying to bag the al-Qaeda and get as much intelligence as possible.
Nukes must be reserved for strategic purposes.
As to Afghanistan itself; look, when you get the guys to coalesce into a certain area, then you can bag them. We can get them and get the intelligence that will come from captives. Keep your eye on the big picture.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
Very long and all too painful for the American family--not only the families of those who died, but all of us. Our losses didn't start on 9/11 and I fear our losses will continue for some time to come--not just our military, but civilians. My tears on the evening of 9/11 were not just for those who died that day, but for the deaths to come in this war.
But I don't want Daschle to shut up. I want him to keep opening his mouth to show what an idiot he is--and it gives our side the opportunity to show him for the fool he is. And it's entertaining to watch Rummy b*-slap the press. It makes them appear to be bigger idiots than Daschle, if that's possible. My favorite moments at a Rummy press conference is the point at which he leans over the podium and shows his teeth in what's supposed to be a smile, and puts down the reporter with just a few short words. I'd miss that if the press corps got a brain transplant, ya know.
No helicopter can survive surface to air and not go down, which is likely what happened in Afghanistan... and I admit my families personal exposure is not scientific, I am just telling you what I have personally seen.
Thats an honorable wish, but just imagine how greedily and hastefully the rats would be searching for nukes if the US did indeed, pelt them with the sands of rudeness.
I do like the thought, however.
Actually, I do not think it will take that, but I will take continued presence for a long time to come. The US has taken upon itself (with some assistance from a very few allies) to perform the required combat ops. We have left it to the Europeans to do the subsequent peace keeping role. It is not the large numbers we need to get use to, it is the duration. The Afghan battle may be over by summer, but the war has only begun. We will be dealing with this for the next half century at least at every level from search and destroy abroad to security measures here at home to some type of policy that educates and brings into 'modern' society the third world 'have nots' so that they see it is in their own interest to change their hateful ideology. Of course, the last level is both the most important and most difficult.
Oh indeed, but that dual rotor design, while having some very real advantages does have the one big disadvantage. Of course those comments refered to earlier models of both aircraft and they may have improved that aspect somewhat in the D and F models of the -47.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.