Skip to comments.
Ninth Circuit to See Vince Foster Body Photos in AJF FOIA Suit
allanfavish.com ^
| February 26, 2002
| Allan J. Favish
Posted on 02/26/2002 8:51:11 PM PST by AJFavish
In the Foster section of my web site is a new letter and declaration from the DOJ and OIC stating that they are enclosing, under seal, color copies of the 10 photos for the court's ex parte in camera review in response to the Ninth Circuit's instructions and that they will bring the original photos to the oral argument for the court's inspection pursuant to the court's instructions. You can download the 313 KB Adobe PDF file by right-clicking on the following and saving your hard drive and then opening with Adobe Acrobat Reader: http://www.allanfavish.com/9cirord.pdf
Regards,
Allan J. Favish
http://www.allanfavish.com
TOPICS: Announcements; Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: Fred Mertz
BTTT.
To: aristeides; AJFavish
The linked document initially tries to obtain 18 original Polaroid photos, but only 10 are currently being discussed.
Is there a mystery in the discrepancy, or a misunderstanding?
To: AJFavish
Good work! Thanks.
To: Fred Mertz
The linked document initially tries to obtain 18 original Polaroid photos, but only 10 are currently being discussed. Is there a mystery in the discrepancy, or a misunderstanding?
I already got those non-body photos released.
Regards,
Allan J. Favish
http://www.allanfavish.com
24
posted on
02/27/2002 6:50:24 AM PST
by
AJFavish
To: AJFavish
Thanks for the clarification, Allan!
To: thinden
Thanks for flagging me on this. I am very interested in future developments.
26
posted on
02/27/2002 7:04:43 AM PST
by
honway
Comment #27 Removed by Moderator
To: AJFavish
keep up the great work...
To: Fred Mertz
Check out the Drudge Report, Hillary and Laura Bush are becomming best friends. I don't think they are worried about any Vince Foster photos.
29
posted on
02/27/2002 8:33:30 AM PST
by
Sawdring
To: Fred Mertz
Thanks for the ping. Do you think the truth about Vinve Foster will ever come out?
30
posted on
02/27/2002 11:26:55 AM PST
by
basil
To: AJFavish
Good luck.
Anybody know why the thread "What's This About Vince Foster? " was deleted?
31
posted on
02/27/2002 12:58:45 PM PST
by
Tymesup
To: AJFavish
Thanks Allan. They say the copies are "true and unaltered". I wonder if they mean like the Medical Examiner Field Report that whited out "neck" wound and changed it to "head" wound. You know, the one where they forgot to alter the second page? That one.
Keep up the good work! You are doing the Lord's work.
32
posted on
02/27/2002 1:44:02 PM PST
by
Samizdat
To: AJFavish
Allan, thanks for your perseverance and dedication to the truth and justice!
To: AJFavish
Thanks for the ping, Allan!
34
posted on
02/28/2002 3:13:46 PM PST
by
AuntB
To: AJFavish; ml/nj; Askel5
A Foster bmp.
To: AJFavish; senator pardek
BTTT
36
posted on
02/28/2002 8:34:49 PM PST
by
Askel5
To: Samizdat
Thanks Allan. They say the copies are "true and unaltered". I wonder if they mean like the Medical Examiner Field Report that whited out "neck" wound and changed it to "head" wound. You know, the one where they forgot to alter the second page? That one. The three official versions of that report are before the Ninth Circuit in this case. I showed them that the version in the possession of the Office of Independent Counsel does not have the apparent remnants of what may be whited-out letters and that the OIC has shown no concern over that fact.
Regards,
Allan J. Favish
http://www.allanfavish.com
37
posted on
03/02/2002 8:08:07 AM PST
by
AJFavish
Comment #38 Removed by Moderator
To: thinden
Hillary can put these photos of Vincenzo Fosterini in her necrophiliac notebooks. The Foster murder will never come to light.
I do think it is connected to WTC bombing #1, though. History has a way of connecting these events.
To: AK-O4
What grounds are being asserted for not releasing to you the photos in dispute? What findings did Judge Keller make in the District Court? The short answer is that the government and two members of his family are claiming that release of the photos will cause the family emotional distress and thereby violate their right of privacy. Keller found that 5 of the 10 photos would cause them such distress. The privacy issue is fully briefed in the August and April 1998 appellate briefs that are on my web site in the section for this lawsuit.
In its July 2000 published opinion, the Ninth Circuit said that the privacy exemption to the FOIA is triggered if the documents will disturb the family members' memory of the deceased. The latest briefs by me argue against the logic of that holding.
Regards,
Allan J. Favish
http://www.allanfavish.com
40
posted on
03/03/2002 7:41:05 PM PST
by
AJFavish
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson