Q ERTY2 + Q ERTY4 + Q ERTY6 = BOYCOTT ANYTHING rodham clinton
REALITY CHECK BUMP!
- Whatever happened to BOYCOTTING COMPANIES HIRING THE CLINTONS???
- In recent days, at least one Bill Clinton operative has been calling journalists with a message: The ex-President didn't really want to pardon Marc Rich. The Israelis or the Mossad or the Jews made him do it.
- This is nonsense. Clinton pardoned Rich for his own benefit.
- Anti-Semitic Double Standard
- John LeBoutillier Monday July 17, 2000
- All Americans--not just Jewish Americans--should be angered and ashamed over Hillary Clinton's blatant anti-Semitism. There is a huge double standard in the media and among leading Jews when it comes to the insults and abusive language used by Democrats toward Jews.
- Let's examine a few facts: Hillary Clinton called a 1974 Clinton campaign worker whose father was Jewish a "f---ing Jew bastard." That has been confirmed by two people--the wife of the man and a campaign worker. But now we learn --read it in Newsmax.com's Inside Cover --that both Bill and Hillary repeatedly used anti-Jewish
- slurs when they engaged each other in loud, horrible squabbles. The term "Jew mother----er" was frequently hurled about the Arkansas governor's mansion.
- And on top of that we have the now-famous scene from last fall when Hillary Clinton kissed Suha Arafat, wife of PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat, on the cheek after Mrs. Arafat had charged that Israel was intentionally poisoning the drinking water that flowed to the Palestinian encampments.
- Do you believe that this clear anti-Semitic and anti-Israel record--if it belonged to a Republican--would disqualify that person from winning election to the U.S. Senate?
- Do you have any doubt that the leaders of Jewish organizations and the anti-defamation movement would castigate any Republican with such a deplorable record?
- Do you have any doubt that the national news media would absolutely destroy any Republican who made even one anti-Semitic statement--let alone the many uttered by the Clintons?
- It is clear that there are two standards at work here: one for Democrats and an entirely different one for Republicans.
- Jewish Americans, like African-Americans, for the past 50 years or so have become the bedrock base of the Democratic coalition. And, just like the African-Americans, they have allowed themselves to be taken advantage of by the Democrat Party. The Jewish vote is taken for granted by Democrats running for office. The Jewish voters allow themselves to be monopolized by one party.
- The shame of it is that the Republican Party has done more to protect the state of Israel, perhaps the single greatest concern of Jewish voters. In 1973 during the Yom Kippur War it was President Nixon who airlifted huge amounts of arms and aid to Israel. And it was Nixon who warned Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev not to put combat troops anywhere near Israel.
- Prime Minister Golda Meir said at that time that President Nixon was "the greatest friend Israel ever had."
- Similarly, it was President Ronald Reagan who came to Israel's rescue in the 1980s when cross-border shelling from Lebanon threatened Israel.
- And who can forget the Iraqi Scuds threatening Israel during the 1991 Gulf War? Again a Republican president, George Bush, put American Patriot missiles and crews inside Israel until the hostilities ceased.
- None of this is to suggest that Democrats have not also stood with Israel through thick and thin; they have. But their more pacifist approach to conflict is at direct odds with what is best for Israel's security.
- The long-held Republican-conservative view of "peace through strength" has also been Israel's mantra since its creation 50 years ago.
- Now we come to Hillary Clinton's campaign for U.S. Senate in New York.
- Prominent Jews, including former Mayor Ed Koch, have leapt to her defense despite these abhorrent slurs against all Jews. So has Abe Foxman, the head of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League. They have lost their credibility when they defend someone who has made such disgusting and insulting comments.
- By defending Hillary that have diminished the shame that ought to be attached to such language.
- The Clintons are Ivy League law school graduates. They are masters of the clever and precise use of language. But, in reality, they are the lowest form of white trash we have ever seen on the national stage.
- Their words and their behavior say it all.
- They are a disgrace to us all.
- Forty-nine-year-old writer Fran Lebowitz was perturbed about Hillary Clinton's all-but-certain Senate run. She had already made up her mind to vote for Mrs. Clinton but, she said, she was still unhappy. "I feel it's a personal plot," she said. "I feel like she personally sat down and said, 'How could I possibly get Fran Lebowitz to vote for me? I have to run against Giuliani.'"
- Ms. Lebowitz wasn't finished. "I think she's a very poor role model for girls," she said. "I believe she's someone who decided at a young age that 'I want to be President, but I can't, because I'm a girl. So I'll marry the President.' I think that's so regressive." She paused for breath. "She's a poll-taker, she's a pulse-taker, she's not a leader. She doesn't really seem to have any ideas" And then she comes here and panders."
The New York Observer, JANUARY 17, 2000
- The Fran Lebowitz Method of
- Auto-Disenfranchisement
- by Mia T
Writer Fran Lebowitz's witless justification -- her famous bons mots notwithstanding -- for voting for hillary clinton, someone she clearly regards with utter contempt, reveals the insidious process by which classes of voters become auto-disenfranchised.
The "Liberal Professional Woman" could not do more to render herself powerless than to adopt Lebowitz's reflexive groupthink and vote for this horrific, corrupt phony.
Groupthink damages not only the groupthinker but society as a whole. It is precisely this sort of simplistic non-analysis that produced a lawless, rapist president, a lawless, co-rapist consort, a corrupted society, a confused, violent generation and an eviscerated national defense, witness 9/11.
- HILLARY'S JEWISH PROBLEM
New York Post
Published: 7/15/00
- clintonism and the theology of contempt
by Mia T
- Let us hope that the rabbi's question was merely rhetorical. . . Let us hope that Rabbi Potasnik, and by extension, New York Jews, are not as credulous and obsequious and passive as they appear. . .
- The simple answer to the rabbi's question is that the corrupt, self-serving, anti-Semitic, power-hungry harpy cannot be trusted.
- Weren't we to never forget?
- The Holocaust must remain, for Jew and Gentile alike, a constant reminder that mass credulity and obsequiousness and passivity are necessary for the demagogue to prevail.
- To remember that six million Jews died in the Holocaust is to understand that centuries of anti-Semitic attitudes made this horror possible. We must ask ourselves what role our society played through the centuries that in any way contributed to the atmosphere that made such a genocide even thinkable.
- Which brings me to the clintons and clintonism. . .
- Senator Patrick Moynihan proffered one of the more incisive operant definitions of clintonism -- "defining deviancy down."
- Defining deviancy down, indeed.
- clintonism has made personal and public perversions, personal and public predations, not merely thinkable, not merely acceptable, but de rigueur. (Watch us spin)
- clintonism is the theology of contempt. Not merely toward "F___ing Jew-bastards," or "dumb niggers" or "extra-chromosome right-wingers" but toward any of us whose ideas are different from those of the clintons, gore, and their acolytes.
- So the real question to be answered is this:
- "What fair-minded, clear-thinking person would want to continue
with its theology of contempt?
- What fair-minded, clear-thinking person would vote for hillary clinton or al gore?"
