Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You Mean Hitler Wasn?t A Priest?
National Review Online ^ | Dave Shiflett

Posted on 01/21/2002 6:28:01 AM PST by VinnyTex

You Mean Hitler Wasn?t A Priest?
The truth is, in fact, out there.

Dave Shiflett is coauthor of Christianity on Trial .
January 21, 2001 8:40 a.m.

 

shocking story has been revealed: Adolf Hitler was not a Christian after all. Instead, he hoped to destroy Christianity. This news flash comes courtesy of a group of students at Rutgers University School of Law at Camden, who have posted papers on a website detailing Hitler's desire to eradicate Christianity. The documents are from the archives of Gen. William J. Donovan and were originally prepared for the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, so we can safely assume they are authentic.

To be sure, Hitler's antagonism toward Christianity will not be news to everyone. That its central figure hails from a Jewish family did not set well with him, and its teachings of universal love ran contrary to his violent precepts. Yet one could easily get the impression, these days, that Hitler believed himself to be something of an altar boy on a mission for God.

The Rutgers project's editor, for example, seems to have been taken a bit by surprise. Julie Seltzer Mandel told the Philadelphia Enquirer that "When people think about the Holocaust, they think about the crimes against Jews, but here's a different perspective." The Nazis, she says, "wanted to eliminate the Jews altogether, but they were also looking to eliminate Christianity."

That will unsettle those who have been taught that Hitler was a Christian of some stripe ? and indeed, by some accountings, an enthusiastic Catholic. Bill Clinton, for example, said at the 1999 National Prayer Breakfast that "I do believe that even though Adolf Hitler preached a perverted form of Christianity, God did not want him to prevail." Meanwhile, at the United States Memorial Holocaust Museum, a film portrayed Hitler as an overzealous son of Rome. "Enter Adolf Hitler," the narrator intoned, "Austrian born and baptized a Catholic." Hitler's mission: "In defending myself against the Jews," he is quoted as saying, "I am acting for the Lord. The difference between the Church and me is that I am finishing the job."

That film was altered after protests by, among others, conservative Jewish writers. But the same message crops up elsewhere. Soon after the September 11 attacks, a spokeswoman for the Freedom From Religion organization pronounced Hitler a Catholic. In 1999, Maureen Dowd included Hitler as yet another Christian zealot. According to Dowd, "History teaches that when religion is injected into politics ? the Crusades, Henry VIII, Salem, Father Coughlin, Hitler, Kosovo ? disaster follows."

Hitler was indeed a baptized Catholic, but his rejection of the faith was profound. "My pedagogy is strict," he once explained. "I want a powerful, masterly, cruel and fearless youth... There must be nothing weak or tender about them. The freedom and dignity of the wild beast must shine from their eyes... That is how I will root out a thousand years of human domestication."

That domestication, of course, was in large part due to the influence of Christianity. Hitler was blunter still on other occasions. "It is through the peasantry that we shall really be able to destroy Christianity," he said in 1933, "because there is in them a true religion rooted in nature and blood." His countrymen would have to choose: "One is either a Christian or a German. You can't be both."

Indeed, he understood all too well that Christianity, in the long run, was his enemy. "Pure Christianity ? the Christianity of the catacombs ? is concerned with translating the Christian doctrine into fact. It leads simply to the annihilation of mankind. It is merely wholehearted Bolshevism, under a tinsel of metaphysics." Switch a few words around and you'd think you were listening to Joseph Stalin. And like Stalin, Hitler believed history was on his side: "Do you really believe the masses will ever be Christian again? Nonsense. Never again. The tale is finished... but we can hasten matters. The parsons will be made to dig their own graves."

That promise was to come true in a frightful number of cases. Polish Christians felt the full force of the persecution, as historian John Morley reminds us. "In Poland, both Jews and Christians were objects of Nazi oppression and manipulation." The clergy were a chief target: "In West Prussia, out of 690 parish priests, at least two-thirds were arrested, and the remainder escaped only by fleeing from their parishes. After a month's imprisonment, no less than 214 of these priests were executed... by the end of 1940 only twenty priests were left in their parishes ? about three percent of the number of parish priests in the pre-war era." The toll of murdered Polish priests would rise into the thousands; their Protestant counterparts (though a much smaller group) fared no better, with many members of the clergy perishing in the camps.

The Rutgers site's presentation is entitled "The Nazi Master Plan: The Persecution of the Christian Churches," and it notes a deep hatred of Christianity throughout the higher echelons. "Important leaders of the National Socialist party would have liked to meet this situation [church influence] by complete extirpation of Christianity and the substitution of a purely racial religion." Their assault was massive: "Different steps in that persecution, such as the campaign for the suppression of denominational and youth organizations, the campaign against denominational schools, the defamation campaign against the clergy, started on the same day in the whole area of the Reich... and were supported by the entire regimented press, by Nazi Party meetings, by traveling party speakers."

None of which is to suggest that Christians were uniformly opposed to Hitler, or that some did not actually embrace the Reich. The lesson from Rutgers, however, is that Hitler was no altar boy, acting on behalf of the Christian faith. Indeed, his hope was to be its undertaker ? which was another of his profound miscalcul



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: Aristophanes
(Can you imagine the look on her face when she comes before the throne?)

Can you imagine her having to get past Peter first?

61 posted on 01/21/2002 1:18:47 PM PST by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Doom
No, I don't think you're quite to the level of actively destroying others (divided they fall and all that).
Perhaps some small good comes of your primary obedience to selfishness. =)

Now be honest: I'm dying to see how you rate.

62 posted on 01/21/2002 1:19:12 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
Thank you. For the record: it's not bad enough we have to battle the left, we have bonafide attackers of truth here on FreeRepublic. V's wife.
63 posted on 01/21/2002 1:22:30 PM PST by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: breakem
Well, as amazing as it might seem when one contemplates the prospect of a "mother-only" right to homicide as some "human right" ... I think there are those who've bought into the lie that it's better to be dead than unwanted or that Gaia/Mother Earth was some kind of misogynist whose shoddy workmanship on the female body we must fix by affording women the right to be unpregnant at will.

So, because "ignorance is invincible" in some respects, it would be unfair to excommunicate those the Church has failed in the right formation of their consciences to withstand such lies and garbage thought.

It's those who actively procure, assist to procure or promote abortion of whom I speak as "culpable" for their actions. Just being shortsighted doesn't do it.

64 posted on 01/21/2002 1:22:37 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
I believe the politicans know what they are doing. They know it conflicts with the religious teachings of their church, yet they fund abortion and pass other laws supporting it. If I were the shotcaller in the vatican or the cardinal of NY etc, They'd be gone.
65 posted on 01/21/2002 1:26:12 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
Now be honest: I'm dying to see how you rate.

I don't know. What the heck is "Reformed Orthodox Latter-Day Ahura-Mazdian?"

(One guess what it really was.)

66 posted on 01/21/2002 1:29:30 PM PST by Doctor Doom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Viva La Homeschool
Excellent

I can just imagine you saying that in a Mr. Burns voice. "Eeexcellent..."

67 posted on 01/21/2002 1:29:45 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
What is this Nun's "Network?" V's wife.
68 posted on 01/21/2002 1:34:15 PM PST by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
I quickly stomped her nonsense out with a bunch of facts and dropped the class the next day.

Good work. May I assume that your leftist teacher did not know how to react to an informed student?

69 posted on 01/21/2002 1:34:59 PM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: breakem
I'm confident the politicians know what they are doing. Abortion is a GOP policy, after all. That's the beauty of their "I'm personally opposed, BUT ..." mantra.

They rely on the faith of their pro-life constituents to power them into office USING abortion and them they consistently vote against the Right to Life.

One of the most egregious example of the late GOP Senate being its claim that -- because the vote on the Schumer Amendment looked like it was going to be a tie and, gasp, give Gore good press from the leftwing media should he break the tie vote -- they were forced to split their consciences and pass the Schumer Amendment. Does 80-17 sound like a near "tie" to you?

For the most part, they are liars. We've handful of men who vote their consciences (including the likes of Ron Paul who, unfortunately, is so conscientious he keeps to his charter and won't touch abortion at the federal level). The rest can rot in hell as far as I'm concerned. I suspect many will.

Particularly those who -- like President Bush -- go so far as to dangle the Scripture of his "favorite philosopher" in prime time as he announces his decision to fund research on "Excess" manufactured human lives that have "already been killed."

You'd think the ACLU, ADL and the like would have been up in arms over his blatant use of Christian Scripture in his first televised addressed. Guess the goods they got were too overwhelming to make a peep about it.

Who'd have guessed the "Moral Majority" would be too busy high-fiving each other over Bush's Clintonesque ability to keep a campaign promised or the prime time Scripture mention to "inform consciences". I'm sure the ACLU, ADL and others were content to know that -- when it all boils down -- ACTIONS speak LOUDER than words.

70 posted on 01/21/2002 1:35:54 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Faith_j
The real point is that you know nothing about the relationship between the Church and the Fascists. Mussolini was an atheistic thug who did everything in his power to limit Catholic activity to the churches.
71 posted on 01/21/2002 1:38:09 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ThJ1800
This is shocking? and this is news? Hell, I knew this is junior high.

Let me guess: That was in the 50's or you went to a private school.

72 posted on 01/21/2002 1:38:34 PM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ventana
It's a group started in '71, I believe by about 47 "Catholic" nuns. They go around raising consciousness and power-lobbying the politicians before any major vote on "social justice" issues.

NETWORK: The Catholic Social Justice Lobby

Seriously, we could do worse than to join, take note and take action in opposition to their every move.

73 posted on 01/21/2002 1:40:29 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

Comment #74 Removed by Moderator

To: Doctor Doom
Lemme guess: "Not Applicable"

I was so hoping you'd take it seriously (or as seriously as one takes anything on "Beliefnet") and shoot me your results.

Strangely enough, I came up 100% compatible with Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic. Go figure. =)

75 posted on 01/21/2002 1:43:46 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Faith_j
I can't even muster up enthusism to bash you over the head with history.

I've yet to see you do that with anyone, actually.

The opinions you have of history certainly are entertaining, nonetheless ... do continue.

76 posted on 01/21/2002 1:45:01 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Faith_j
Yawn. I can't even muster up enthusism to bash you over the head with history.

Well, isn't that special. Do you really hold the position that Fascist Italy always abided by the Lateran treaty? If you do, it's back to the books for you, and no more Cornwell until you finish your Paul Johnson.

BTW, you do realize that Cornwell is a Vanity Fair columnist, not a historian, don't you?

77 posted on 01/21/2002 1:45:51 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
Catholics who deal scandalously with the Church are subject to "a just penalty". See the Code of Canon Law, especially BOOK VI : SANCTIONS IN THE CHURCH PART II : PENALTIES FORPARTICULAR OFFENCES TITLE I: OFFENCES AGAINST RELIGION AND THE UNITY OF THE CHURCH (Cann. 1364 - 1369) and following.
78 posted on 01/21/2002 1:46:51 PM PST by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Faith_j
What the handouts said might have had something to do with it. For instance, if you passed out a leaflet saying that George Bush should be shot, the Secret Service would take an interest and you probably would find yourself behind bars.
79 posted on 01/21/2002 1:47:52 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
I took it seriously. It came up exactly as you'd expect.

(I'm surprised there was no entry for Jedi apprentice, but hey.)

80 posted on 01/21/2002 1:48:12 PM PST by Doctor Doom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson