Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressman cancels tax forum
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 1/20/2002

Posted on 01/19/2002 10:07:00 PM PST by Pern

Congressman cancels tax forum

Bartlett 'dismayed' by 'Operation Wait to File until the Trial'

What was long anticipated as an epic confrontation between the federal government and the "tax honesty" movement has gone up in smoke, with the cancellation of the planned Feb. 27 and 28 tax policy forum in Washington by the congressman that had been the aggrieved petitioners' greatest official supporter.

"I am quite dismayed by Operation "Wait to File until the Trial," said Rep. Roscoe G. Bartlett, R-Md., in a press release. Bartlett communicated his decision in a letter to Robert L. Schulz, chairman of the board of We The People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc., who had requested the forum.

In his letter to Schulz, Bartlett wrote: "The information that you are currently disseminating concerning the February 27 & 28 forum is misleading. I will not be a party to advocating the non-payment of federal income taxes."

We The People, an organization that disputes, on various grounds, the legality of the federal income tax, has been urging Americans to hold off filing their 2001 income tax returns until after the planned hearings in Washington, D.C., next month.

"The very legality of the U.S. income tax system goes on trial Feb. 27 at a congressionally sponsored public hearing on Capitol Hill," said a statement on We The People's website.

Bartlett, who was the congressional sponsor of the hearing, explained that Schulz's "rhetoric has made it impossible for the forum to take place because the Internal Revenue Service and Department of Justice will not participate."

The Maryland Republican "remains committed to ensuring the right of Bob Schulz and other citizens to exercise their constitutional rights under the First Amendment to get answers to their questions about federal tax policy from the government," according to his press statement. As an alternative to the much-ballyhooed February confrontation, he offered to forward Schulz's questions to both the Justice Department and Internal Revenue Service, and to post their answers on his congressional website.

Here is the text of Bartlett's letter:

Dear Bob:

I am quite dismayed by the tone of your rhetoric on your web page – "Wait to File Until the Trial."

When I first met you in July of 2001, you seemed to want answers to questions regarding the legitimacy of the 16th Amendment to the Constitution. As a congressman who believes and follows the Constitution, you found a willing ear. In the numerous meetings that followed, I never advocated the non-payment of income taxes. You were quick to agree and assured me that you never took this position as well.

The information that you are currently disseminating concerning the February 27 & 28 forum is misleading. While I remain committed to making every effort so that you can exercise your constitutional right to get answers to your questions, your rhetoric has made it impossible for the forum to take place because the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) will not participate.

This is the alternative. I do not believe that IRS and DOJ will refuse to answer my questions. Please send the questions that you and your team developed to my Washington, D.C., office. I will refer them to the appropriate individuals at the IRS and the DOJ to respond. Since I know that there are thousands of people across this nation who want answers to similar questions, I will post both the questions and answers on my congressional web site.

In any future statements regarding my support, please be sure that it is clear that I am supporting your constitutional rights and not that I am advocating not filing and not paying taxes.

Sincerely,

ROSCOE G. BARTLETT

Member of Congress

The tax group had expected, at the forum, "to prove conclusively that the IRS does not have the legal authority to force employers to withhold taxes from the paychecks of their employees, or to force most Americans to file a return or pay the income tax."

"If the research is confirmed publicly, most Americans may be entitled to a refund of 100 percent of the income tax paid or withheld in 2001," the statement continued.

"The IRS and Department of Justice will officially and publicly answer detailed legal allegations directly challenging the jurisdiction of the IRS and the unlawful enforcement and administration of U.S. income tax laws," Schulz had said.

The two-day hearing had originally been scheduled for Sept. 24-25, but was postponed until next month in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: taxreform
We knew this would happen.
1 posted on 01/19/2002 10:07:00 PM PST by Pern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pern
WTP blew it, plain and simple!
2 posted on 01/19/2002 10:11:57 PM PST by soundsolutions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pern;*Taxreform
bump
3 posted on 01/19/2002 10:19:59 PM PST by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pern
Roscoe Bartlett is my Congressman here in Frederick Co. Maryland, he is a member of our Church also. Roscoe Bartlett is very respected here in Frederick Co. If he said these people at WTP misrepresented themselves to him, I will bet my bottom dollar they did.
4 posted on 01/19/2002 10:22:18 PM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
I really think they were looking for any reason to cancel this Q&A session.

Maybe Roscoe Bartlett didn't give up when he said he'd forward questions to the IRS and DOJ, but to pretend to be concerned and then back out over a imagined wrong is cowardly, and typically politician.

5 posted on 01/19/2002 10:30:21 PM PST by Pern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pern
Hmmm, this is getting more curious, not to mention suspicious with each phony cancellation/postponement. No national disasters to use an excuse. So they'll have to use a little sour grapes and be cry babies to call off their potentially embarrassing, if not devastating meeting....

, he offered to forward Schulz's questions to both the Justice Department and Internal Revenue Service, and to post their answers on his congressional website.

Oh, OK...and what kind of excuse will he come up with for them never answering the questions or deciding not to post the answers?...

I don't think this was the way to weaken WTP's position on this issue, Congressman Bartlett just emboldened WTP's position.....

6 posted on 01/19/2002 10:40:49 PM PST by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: soundsolutions
WTP blew it, plain and simple!

I think the opposite is true. It wouldn't have mattered what they did, there never was nor will there ever be a meeting with anyone, let alone the answers posted on the Congressman's website....ain't gonna happen.

According to the article "'Operation Wait to File until the Trial'" isn't saying don't pay your taxes, the "trial" was scheduled for Feb 27 and 28...you have untill April 15 to file....what's Bartlett's problem with waiting?

7 posted on 01/19/2002 10:50:06 PM PST by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pern
This was to be expected.
8 posted on 01/20/2002 12:20:18 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pern
Bartlett was certainly shown the errors of his ways by someone--and it wasn't Schultz or his website.
9 posted on 01/20/2002 8:42:49 AM PST by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rowdee
I haven't followed this too closely, but this is the forum that was scheduled in response to some guy's hunger strike, right? Obviously, the guy wouldn't have ended his hunger strike if he knew that the forum would never happen. He was therefore defrauded into eating and cheated out of martyrdom by the same dishonesty and lack of accountability he was protesting. If someone tricked me into living for a promise that was destined to be broken, I'd be pretty p.o.'d. Sounds very personal. How radical will his response be?
10 posted on 01/20/2002 9:01:52 AM PST by HaveGunWillTravel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HaveGunWillTravel
Will be interesting to follow.

Another Congressman appears to have gone into cover your arse mode.

11 posted on 01/20/2002 9:37:29 AM PST by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rowdee
The IRS and the DOJ will NOT answer the questions in an open forum because...as far as the Government is concerned...
there are NO answers to the questions...
To answer would be to admit that income tax is illegal and therefore would have to be eliminated/changed/or ???

Stay tuned..!!!
But keep your powder dry..!!!
12 posted on 01/20/2002 9:59:03 AM PST by freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

bump
13 posted on 01/21/2002 8:59:13 AM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson