Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Love is ... life without the pitter-patter of tiny feet (Angry Feminist alert!)
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | 1/2/2 | Rachel Roberts

Posted on 01/02/2002 6:49:27 AM PST by dead

Is it really so hard to understand, asks Rachel Roberts, that there can be more to a couple's relationship than having children?

I am one of a growing number of women who will elect not to have children. And at least in my experience, the decision to not have children isn't one that is met with much enthusiasm.

From the family, there are comments like "But don't you want us all to have kids playing together at birthday parties and barbecues?" and "I've just always thought that part of a couple's life together is having a family".

From friends, there are protests like "But you'd make such great parents!" or "You've had such a good family life, don't you want to re-create that yourself?"

On the whole, though, the standard response is scepticism. Brush-offs. "Oh, you say that now, but wait till you turn 30!" And "I thought that, too, when I was your age but, trust me, that biological clock really gets you."

Well, I am fast approaching 30 and I have never been surer that I don't want children. My partner feels the same. We have thought about it a lot and have decided time and again that no, it's not for us. We don't want to be woken up at all hours to attend a screaming infant that knows only the need to suck. We don't want to sacrifice our time and energy chasing death-defying toddlers or taxiing around teenagers who have recently learnt to hate us.

More importantly, neither of us (me, especially) wants to see my body torn asunder during childbirth. We already love our life the way it is, child-free. And that is why the brush-off response interests me the most.

It's as though those who either have, or some day want, children refuse to recognise other possibilities in life. They are mentally closing off to paths different from their well-worn one. Particularly for women, it seems that in the face of all political and cultural change, we can always rely on some things staying the same.

Thirty years on from second-wave feminism, people are still incredulous of the woman who declares she doesn't want to be a mother.

Feminists have long argued that the social and political resistance to women who choose to remain child-free reflects a far deeper cultural anxiety about what is expected of women. Traditional femininity is inextricably bound up with notions of mothering, nurturance and birth.

Since day dot, motherhood has been viewed as the natural female career. And now, thanks to an enduring belief in biological determinism, the desire to bear children continues to be seen in terms of instinct, as a drive that is universally hard-wired into the female psyche. To be a normal woman, we must at least want children, even if for some reason we cannot have them.

Yeah, yeah, I hear you say, we've all done Feminism 101 - tell us something we don't know. Well, having experienced the reactions couples meet when revealing that they do not want children, I suspect there is something more at play than simply challenging the traditional ideology that surrounds women. Certainly a woman who elects not to have children is treading a less orthodox path. However, it's not just the woman's decision to not have children that disturbs convention, but the man's as well. As partners they upset traditional understandings of what heterosexual love is about. Why do I think this? Well, when was the last time any of us saw a romantic film where one lover whispers to the other "I love you so much, darling, I never want to have your baby!" It just wouldn't seem right.

From wedding ceremonies to popular culture, we are saturated with the idea that children are the symbol of a man and woman's love for each other. Undoubtedly the outcome of their physical union, children are moreover portrayed as the embodiment of a couple's emotional bond. The place where a man and woman's DNA and souls enmesh.

Having children remains integral to our contemporary mythology of love and desire, and those couples who reject parenthood disappoint our romantic expectations. They let us down by not making what is seen as the ultimate declaration of heterosexual love.

So perhaps that is why society shrugs off couples who don't want children. Perhaps the sceptical comments from family and friends reflect an unwillingness to accept romantic defeat. At the very least, it shows a distinct lack of imagination when it comes to recognising signs of love.

After all, for couples like us, the real romance is in being child-free.

Rachel Roberts is a freelance writer.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-304 next last
To: joathome
I know plenty of men who have no instincts or desire to have a child at all, including my brotherS in law. Kids just don't interest them. Do you feel the same way about them?

I don't have a problem with any man or woman who doesn't want kids. Some people don't like kids around including some women and shouldn't have them. Why that brings out the reaction it has (among some here) is a mystery, but maybe you explained it. Just don't think ALL men have a problem with it. Only the ones with a problem with females.

81 posted on 01/02/2002 8:19:54 AM PST by RightThinkinDood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dead
a rat is a dog is a pig is a feminist.

(..with profound apologies to rats, dogs and pigs.)

82 posted on 01/02/2002 8:20:57 AM PST by martin gibson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
"throw her arms around your neck and hug you for dear life"

I have one 2 year old daughter, and a son on the way in 2 weeks. I started somewhat late (mid thirties when the first child was born) and didn't think that I wanted children at all for many years...but I can now say that it is the smartest and most wonderful thing that I've ever done.

Unfortunately, her attitude is dominant among the bicoastal educated elite. They have adopted a culture of death and selfishness, and are trying to push that culture onto the rest of the country through their control of the media and educational system.

83 posted on 01/02/2002 8:21:10 AM PST by quebecois
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Do you view children as nothing more than a burden, inconvenience, and drag on your free-wheeling lifestyle?

A lot of people do. That's why they wait to have them if they have them at all. Some view them that way all their lives. Why should it concern you?

84 posted on 01/02/2002 8:21:44 AM PST by RightThinkinDood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: discostu
I agree with what you said and I am a mother who never regreted having a child, through the good times and the bad times.
85 posted on 01/02/2002 8:32:08 AM PST by muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: discostu
"I don't seek to kill kids and I don't have a problem with other people having them, just don't make me deal with them, or at least bring me booze to steady my nerves after you take the kid away."

LOL...THAT is strong dislike, because in my experience, hate is composed of a passionate a wish to see ( your word here ) destroyed.

If it's any comfort, when my kids come to visit - only one is left at home now, and she's seventeen - and all three of them are together, I enjoy their visit emmensely, but I STILL feel the need for a strong drink in order to relax after the chaos dies down when they go home.

86 posted on 01/02/2002 8:32:42 AM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
I am 28, wife 29, and we have no two kids. 2 beautiful Boxers. Love them smushed up faces. Well, she keeps saying that we need to start having human children. I am unsure. I really dont like little kids that much. They annoy me and they get on my nerves. But my uncle, who was nearly 40 when he had his first kid says that children are the only way to justify your existence. While I don't want to believe him, he is probably right.
87 posted on 01/02/2002 8:35:11 AM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
My wish for the author of this piece is that she eventually has the opportunity to know first hand what it feels like to have your own child throw her arms around your neck and hug you for dear life

Or to sit idly for years wishing she had and suffering the consequences of her actions and realizing how wrong she was for so long.

I predict she will be a 50 something women getting invetro.

88 posted on 01/02/2002 8:37:28 AM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Oh, please...OBL has dozens of kids. Does that justify his existence?? Jesus Christ never had any -- guess he wasn't worth much.
89 posted on 01/02/2002 8:40:35 AM PST by joey'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Oh, please...OBL has dozens of kids. Does that justify his existence?? Jesus Christ never had any -- guess he wasn't worth much.
90 posted on 01/02/2002 8:41:06 AM PST by joey'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: joathome
I think there is a big difference between men and women who do not want to have children and this lady. She seems to be taking a stand against having children as a social/political statement. She has a holier than thou attitude about her "decision" and seems to be promoting the "women don't have to" mentatlity that is pushed by the feminist left as opposed to having genuinly come to the decision to not have children.
91 posted on 01/02/2002 8:43:44 AM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
I see more of a dividing line between rational and irrational hate. If the hatred remains rational you can reason between whether that thing should be destroyed or you should just stay clear. It's rational to wish liberalism destroyed so rational hatred can go as far as you say. It's clearly irrational to wish all children to die and nobody to ever have kids again, so one can hate them and not take it that far.

In full disclosure I have met a few kids that were so amazingly cool that if it were garaunteed that my kids would be like that I'd go home and start working on it right away. Though most of those kids don't like hanging out with their peers and prefer the company of adults, kind of like how I was as a kid, and there's a good chance they're gonna grow up and not have kids too.

92 posted on 01/02/2002 8:51:09 AM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: dead
Too Bad her mother didn't feel the same way.
93 posted on 01/02/2002 8:53:46 AM PST by usslsm51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #94 Removed by Moderator

Comment #95 Removed by Moderator

To: joathome
What do you think?

I think it still would have been posted, and I would find the sentiments expressed therein equally as repulsive.

96 posted on 01/02/2002 8:57:02 AM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: dead
We don't want to be woken up at all hours to attend a screaming infant that knows only the need to suck. We don't want to sacrifice our time and energy chasing death-defying toddlers or taxiing around teenagers who have recently learnt to hate us.
Me, me, me...this "lady" is correct, she is making the right decision, because life is apparently only about her.
97 posted on 01/02/2002 8:58:04 AM PST by PLOM...NOT!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightThinkinDood
So I'm not allowed to say that I think they're being stupid, self centred, immature, childish, and short sighted? How very libertarian of you.

AB

98 posted on 01/02/2002 8:58:43 AM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: dead
Let's face it, there are some people who are lousy parents and should not have had children in the first place. We've all seen them, and thought to ourselves that they should not have had kids if they weren't ready to raise them.

This gender-loathing little feminist obviously falls into that category. I suppose we should all be glad of her decision.

99 posted on 01/02/2002 9:04:13 AM PST by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Nobody said you're not allowed to say it. What's being said is that you should understand that it's people like you that started the hostility between those who don't want kids and those that do, so if you try to blame us you're wrong. Of course you're wrong anyway because there are perfectly understandable completely nonselfish reasons to not have kids (ie, not liking them and feeling it's wrong to raise kids in the hostile atmosphere that would develope if forced to live with something we don't like). You might not agree with those reasons, but we don't care. I say it all the time: none of us are trying to talk you into not having kids, why is it so important to you that we have kids?
100 posted on 01/02/2002 9:05:40 AM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 301-304 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson