Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Continental Flight Diverted to El Paso Due to Unruly Passengers
AP | 12/25/01

Posted on 12/25/2001 12:58:25 PM PST by fiftymegaton

Continental Flight Diverted to El Paso Due to Unruly Passengers

The Associated Press

Published: Dec 25, 2001

EL PASO, Texas (AP) - A Continental Airlines flight from Houston to Los Angeles was diverted to El Paso on Tuesday because of two unruly passengers, officials said. Flight 627 left Houston at 11:50 a.m. and landed in El Paso at 1:43 p.m., said Roland Herwig of the Federal Aviation Administration.

"There were actually two unruly passengers on board the aircraft and as a precautionary measure the plane was diverted to El Paso," Continental spokeswoman Julie King said.

King said the 757 resumed its flight to Los Angeles shortly after it landed.

She said she had no further details, and there were no immediate reports of any injuries.

Officials the El Paso International Airport, including the airport police department, did not return telephone calls placed by The Associated Press. AP-ES-12-25-01 1553EST


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: Timesink
Sounds kind of snobbish to me. Were you on my flight this summer with my toddler grandson? (lol). I used to work in security at a large airport when I was 19 and the worst passenger I ever met was a exc. "suit" who was feeling no pain. To this day I have problems going into any of his stores. Merry Christmas.
41 posted on 12/25/2001 5:05:04 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: fiftymegaton
I haven't finished the thread but was thinking...after spending the Christmas holiday with In-Laws and perhaps an argument with the spousal unit, I can imagine being unruly on the plane. Not towards anyone but my spouse, but definately to my spouse.

Glad the 2 major holidays are done with. One with in laws (as the outlaw)..the other with my family which can sometimes be just as painful.

A few years ago, I thought the other half would be thrown off the plane because of a fight we were having. Some people can't control emotion...and it's sad.

42 posted on 12/25/2001 5:08:25 PM PST by nagdt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
RE: # 35:

Amen!

43 posted on 12/25/2001 5:08:44 PM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
The non smokers thought they could improve on a system like that.

Thankfully, we did.

44 posted on 12/25/2001 5:17:29 PM PST by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP
What is 'tine rage?
45 posted on 12/25/2001 5:18:38 PM PST by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
Post-9/11, if it is reported to be two drunk college students, there will be at least a dozen people on this forum who claim it's a cover up.

And if they are middle eastern types there will be at least 4 posters claiming that Israeli counterintelligence hired them...

46 posted on 12/25/2001 5:22:54 PM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fiftymegaton
Unruly is airline code for drunk. I guess soon we will all be flying naked or not at all.
47 posted on 12/25/2001 5:23:36 PM PST by Pete53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D Joyce
Keine sheise, mein herr!!!

You're on your own Bubba. Sky marshalls have the responsibility of real cops - NONE - if they fail, who ya gonna sue?

Someone gets out of line - jump'em and kick them in the kidneys ASAP.

Rememeber - Dial 911 - and die! It's just as effective

prambo

48 posted on 12/25/2001 5:28:29 PM PST by prambo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fiftymegaton
They need lots and lots of HARD jail time, and brutal fines. What if it were a diversion? Bad. Very Bad.

If the shoe-person were more severly dealt-with on the spot...people...nah, these imbiciles couldn't comprehend the danger and wrongness of their acts...no matter how many innocents die, no matter how. That baby dangling out of the WTC window by its mother's dying hand, didn't get to drink and enjoy a plane ride. Shame on these criminals...and when they get out of court, where I am not sure this now weakened and corrupted country will put them...the people should remember...their families, neighbors and workmates...and take appropriate, and legal...but not kind action. Punish them. Remember 9-11-01. Remember.

49 posted on 12/25/2001 5:55:00 PM PST by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
Then let's have tort reform when it comes to measures to protect private property when lives are involved. Like, you can't sue someone for reasonable measures protecting the lives of people on his airplanes. If you don't want to fly with someone who cuffs unruly passengers, buy yourself a Learjet or charter one.

I am surprised I haven't read anything on FR on this point from our Libertarian cadre (I think they are too busy worrying about the War on Drugs): protecting airplanes is, for the airplanes' owners, a private property issue. Businesses have both a right and a duty to protect their assets and their customers while utilizing those assets. Protecting airplanes is, for the GOVERNMENT, is covered by both of the two legitimate roles of government as defined by Jefferson: protect the citizenry from foreign attack, and mediate disputes among citizens.

50 posted on 12/25/2001 6:04:50 PM PST by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
#23: They should have smoked their sneakers before boarding-rules are rules.
51 posted on 12/25/2001 6:06:18 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
For the purposes of enlightening me, please define "unruly" in the eyes of the airline?

On my airplane (or in my business, in my home or in my car), "unruly" is what I say it is. On YOUR airplane "unruly" is what YOU say it is.

52 posted on 12/25/2001 6:06:40 PM PST by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gg188
"On my airplane (or in my business, in my home or in my car), "unruly" is what I say it is. On YOUR airplane "unruly" is what YOU say it is."

Fair enough, but could you at least post some kind of standard of some sort? Some kind of a "you cannot be more than THIS obnoxious" on our airline? Perhaps a short film before boarding, or a comic book primer ala "Goofus and Gallant". Something like that.

53 posted on 12/25/2001 6:14:48 PM PST by Billy_bob_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
Two hours to fly less than 600 NM? Maybe they were unruly because the flight was making lousy time.

Don't be an idiot. First of all, simply because they landed at EP doesn't mean they were over the city when they decided to land. They could have returned to EP from farther away. Second, I realize you probably were not serious (at least I hope you weren't) but it should go without saying that lateness is not a reason to be unruly. At this point, joking about it isn't funny.

54 posted on 12/25/2001 6:18:49 PM PST by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Unruliness by the nicotine-deprived. Sometimes they get so unruly the plane has to be landed for them to be dealt with.
55 posted on 12/25/2001 6:20:18 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
"Couple hundred years ago, when we had smoking sections in airplanes, it was a fun place to be."

What a fascinating piece of revisionist history. We non-amokers thought it was hell to be cramped up with drug addicts spewing their toxic waste into our fresh air.

Truly the bad old days...

56 posted on 12/25/2001 6:29:24 PM PST by Dr. Luv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
Nobody is going to sue these "unruly passengers" for whatever turmoil they have caused

If the airline presses charges then the unruly passengers will be charged for the amount of money it cost the airline to divert the flight ... fuel and employee compensation. It's significant.

57 posted on 12/25/2001 6:29:57 PM PST by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dvan
There's a very good explanation why they were unruly. It was a married couple.
58 posted on 12/25/2001 6:30:42 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Is that what really happens? Because the Arab guy from LA who made threats against all Americans when he was busted for smoking in the bathroom on board said he was going to sue because he feels he was treated unfairly for looking middle eastern. And you know in LA he could win pretty easily.
59 posted on 12/25/2001 6:36:22 PM PST by Cinnamon Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: fiftymegaton
Today, I flew Cedar Rapids-St.Louis-Columbus. Was I profiling? You betcha.
60 posted on 12/25/2001 6:39:44 PM PST by buccaneer81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson