[tonycavanagh]

re : The only difference is that terrorists could hit London.

I agree London has been hit many times, we have had some major explosions and have suffered loss of life.

America was hit and of course America has the right to hit back, but Somalia, you have one war lord telling you that another war lord is a terrorist never mind the fact they are both rivals.

Suddenly all these anti Saddam Iraqi groups are telling you of Saddams links to terrorism.

You have to ask your self is America being used to fight other peoples battles for them.

Cheers Tony.

Cheers Tony

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

..you have one war lord telling you that another war lord is a terrorist never mind the fact they are both rivals...

Of course they put the finger on each other. But the world knows what Saddam is, and it 'aint a shoeshine boy. Not yet, anyway.

[jwfiv]

If Saddam hadn't invaded Kuwait back then, he would have done something else equally goofy between then and now....conflict with that garbage is inevitable, he's begging for it.

There is no old score to settle with So-damned. We won the first match, 7 to 0. His unrelenting efforts to acquire WMD and the ability to project, will place another match on the schedule. No hypotheticals necessary, reality bites and we need to bite back, or more of our people will die.

Re: the warlords pointing fingers in Somalia, Sudan and elsewhere, trying to choose our targets for us...well, just remember, this ain't being done on xlinton's watch.