Posted on 11/26/2001 8:09:44 PM PST by JohnHuang2
Edited on 04/29/2004 1:59:41 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
WASHINGTON (CNN) --Iraqi President Saddam Hussein should take President Bush's demand Monday that Iraq allow international weapons inspections to resume as a "very sober, chilling message," Secretary of State Colin Powell said.
During a Rose Garden appearance, Bush said Hussein "needs to let inspectors back in his country to show us that he is not developing weapons of mass destruction."
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
One does get the impression that most of the WH press corps is comprised of interns. From a local high school.
My husband stated almost the exact same thing tonight while we watched the C-SPAN re-run of today's press briefing conducted by Ari Fleisher!
Husband said, "but for the old bag in the front row (Helen Thomas) the press gaggle looks as though they're fresh out of anti-America journalism schools."
Quite. That's what it means to be an adult.
The president's comments did serve to highlight a debate within the administration over what to do about Iraq. The still-doesn't-get-it CNN continues to peddle the Great Liberal Hope that there is a "debate" going on in the White House, as opposed to a wide range of options being made available to the President. At this point they are so desperate to sell this line that here they actually resort to designating Powell as the person who is "seen as" the leader of a faction that urges restraint. Seen by whom? By hopeful liberals in the media, that's who. Notice they don't say that Powell is the leader of such a faction. They can't, because in the next paragraph Powell is going to call the Iraqi regime "evil" and use the Official Diplomatic Code Word ("all of his options") that means "Blowing them up is definitely on the table." What we have here is a U.S. media establishment that has totally made up a struggle that they wish was happening. They then report this to the public over and over, citing each other as their source. They've gone past shading the truth and highlighting only the stories that fit their agenda, now they are literally making up news and reporting it as fact. It's all become a kind of show business that deals in fiction as readily as it deals in fact. Rather than "news," it's all about getting on TV so that I can hide in a journalism suit and promote my agenda. |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.