Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maryland County Declares Tobacco Smoke a Pollutant
Cato ^ | November 26, 2001

Posted on 11/26/2001 8:21:42 AM PST by Mr. Mulliner

Maryland County Declares
Tobacco Smoke a Pollutant

The Montgomery County, Md. council yesterday approved one of the most restrictive anti-smoking measures in the nation, setting stiff fines for people who smoke in their homes if it offends their neighbors, according to The Washington Post.

Under the county’s new indoor air quality standards, tobacco smoke would be treated in the same manner as other potentially harmful pollutants, such as asbestos, radon, molds or pesticides. If the smoke wafts into a neighbor’s home -- whether through a door, a vent or an open window -- that neighbor could complain to the county’s Department of Environmental Protection.

Smokers, and in some cases landlords or condominium associations that fail to properly ventilate buildings, would face fines of up to $750 per violation if they failed to take steps to mitigate the problem.

When the nation’s strictest public smoking ban took effect in the Washington suburb of Friendship Heights, assistant director of Cato’s Project on Global Economic Liberty Jacobo Rodríguez, a nonsmoker who lives there, filed suit against the city and the ordinance was eventually retracted.

Robert A. Levy, Cato’s senior fellow in constitutional studies and an expert on tobacco litigation, argues that smoking bans represent meddling, snooping, busybody government at its worst. He says bans are dismissive of the rights of an unpopular minority -- namely smokers -- without any basis in the Constitution, science or logic. “All a nonsmoker has to do to escape unwelcome outdoor tobacco fumes is take a step or two away,” says Levy. “That’s not too much to ask to promote civility without shutting down all social contact.”

“Ordinarily, we rely on common courtesy and mutual respect when individuals relate to one another,” Levy says. “But nosy, intrusive government has polarized the dispute between smokers and nonsmokers. As a result, venom has replaced respect and obstinate behavior has replaced common courtesy. It is government, not secondhand smoke, that has poisoned the atmosphere.”
 



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: govwatch; pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator

To: EricOKC
It is not easy to have fun when some smokin jerk clouds my fresh air.
62 posted on 11/26/2001 12:29:17 PM PST by LloydChristmas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: EricOKC
"What about a smokers right to smoke? What about a smokers right to eat out? What about a smokers right to enjoy the neighborhood park?"

You just don't get it. All of those things are fine. Just keep your disgusting smoke out of my lungs. If you go out to eat and start throwing food at me, then I have a problem with that. If you go to the park and start flashing me, then I also have a problem with that. Are you able to understand the difference or do you want me to type slower?

64 posted on 11/26/2001 1:03:06 PM PST by LloydChristmas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

To: LloydChristmas
If you go out to eat and start throwing food at me, then I have a problem with that. If you go to the park and start flashing me, then I also have a problem with that.

And any of the above would have to do exactly what with the intelligent points EricOKC laid out?

Are you able to understand the difference or do you want me to type slower?

Don't you anti-smoking Talibaners ever tire of the ad hominem attacks when you run out of arguments?

But then, you don't really have any, do you?

67 posted on 11/26/2001 1:15:57 PM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: EricOKC
My pleasure, fellow freedom fighter.
69 posted on 11/26/2001 1:33:40 PM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
OK ERICOKC

Let me get this straight. You want non-smokers to run around and beg Smoking Morons not to smoke. Whatever happened to common courtesy? I think I will spit on everyone I see. If they ask me not to spit on them then I may not spit on them(only if they ask me nice). It is my right to spit on them unless they ask me not to spit on them(nice). Who am I hurting if I spit on them? I am the most important person on this earth. If I chose to spit on them then I should do whatever makes me feel good. I do not care about you or anybody else I come into contact with(unless they ask me not to spit on them & if they ask me politely then I will start caring for them as my own). I wish only bad things toward others as long as I am happy and look cool spitting

70 posted on 11/26/2001 1:37:40 PM PST by LloydChristmas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: LloydChristmas
bump
71 posted on 11/26/2001 1:38:02 PM PST by LloydChristmas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: mlocher
this is not an issue about smoking or polution. it is an issue about personal freedom and the rights of the government.

Your personal freedom ends where my lungs begin.


BUMP

72 posted on 11/26/2001 1:55:31 PM PST by tm22721
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LloydChristmas
Since ALL burning causes CO, CO2, nitrus oxides, etc. weather one is smoking or not, I think you should be talking about your neighbor heating his house and/or driving an automobile before burning cigarettes. Nothing like fresh air.
73 posted on 11/26/2001 2:02:18 PM PST by box221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: tm22721
your personal freedom ends where my lungs begin

i agree. with freedom comes responsibility. all you have to do is ask me to stop (i only smoke an occasional cigar) and i will -- maybe not joyfully, but i will stop.

don't need a tax dollar wasting law for that.

74 posted on 11/26/2001 2:11:24 PM PST by mlocher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

Comment #76 Removed by Moderator

To: LloydChristmas
Hello Numbnuts! It is a pollutant.

So is car exhaust, industry and many other things.

77 posted on 11/26/2001 3:50:34 PM PST by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
No, you smoke because it makes you feel powerful. You control the air around you. You make non-smokers grovel at your feet...
Please, Sir SmokesAlot, extinguish thy flaming weed! Have mercy on my poor lungs, for they are pink with cleanness!

Just admit that smoking is disgusting and repulsive and we can all put this thread to rest.

78 posted on 11/26/2001 3:52:28 PM PST by HarryDunne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic
You exhale carbon dioxide! Good Lord, do something about it!

Yeah, and as far as I can see, he serves less of a purpose than my sokes.

79 posted on 11/26/2001 3:54:16 PM PST by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Great Dane
what are "sokes"?
80 posted on 11/26/2001 4:22:05 PM PST by HarryDunne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson