Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GAY DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS UNITE TO SUPPORT FAMILIES OF TERROR VICTIMS
gaywire press releases ^ | 25 NOV 2001 | Kevin Ivers, Log Cabin Republicans Director of Public Affairs

Posted on 11/25/2001 12:06:54 PM PST by RobertBauman

Log Cabin Republicans and National Stonewall Democrats Issue Joint Comment

(WASHINGTON, DC) In a display of bipartisan unity, the leading Republican and Democratic organizations in the gay and lesbian community have written a joint "public comment" to the Department of Justice (DOJ) concerning survivor benefits for those killed in the September 11th terrorist attacks.

"We at LCR and NSD are united in seeking to do all we can to console and assist those whose lives were forever changed by the losses suffered during the September 11th attack on our nation," wrote Rich Tafel, executive director of Log Cabin Republicans, and Chad Johnson, executive director of National Stonewall Democrats, in a letter to the DOJ Office of Management Programs, Civil Division.

Attorney General John Ashcroft issued a Notice of Inquiry and Advance Notice of Rulemaking seeking public comment on matters relating to the implementation of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001. The Fund, passed as part of the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act, allows for compensation for survivors of victims of the September 11th attacks.

Under the Act, the Attorney General will appoint a Special Master to administrate the Fund. DOJ will shortly promulgate regulations directing the scope and operations of the Office of the Special Master, which will include criteria for determining who is eligible for survivor benefits.

The Notice of Inquiry solicited public comments that advise the DOJ on how to direct the Special Master in administering the Fund. LCR and NSD issued a joint comment to address questions that affect the families of gay and lesbian victims of the terrorist attacks. Among other things, the comment directed the DOJ to examine the actions of New York Governor George Pataki relating to such matters. On October 11, Governor Pataki ordered the State of New York, when determining survivors for state fund purposes, to include factors that identified and included gay and lesbian partners and families.

"The issue of supporting all the families who were devastated by these attacks on America is so important that there should be no divisions between us," said Rich Tafel, executive director of Log Cabin Republicans. "We are a united community in support of our families in need, speaking with one voice in this joint action today."

"We are working together to ensure that the survivors of gay and lesbian partners aren't forgotten," said Chad Johnson, NSD Executive Director. "We urge the federal government to follow the lead of Governor Pataki to make sure that valid relationships of all kinds are recognized."

"Our goal is to be a resource for the Special Master in identifying legitimate survivors in a manner that transcends party politics," said Johnson. "We are first Americans, then partisans, and I can't imagine that anyone has even contemplated the party affiliation of any victim or survivor."

"By acting in unison, we hope to demonstrate that the questions we raise are concerns that surpass politics," said Tafel.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 11/25/2001 12:06:55 PM PST by RobertBauman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Homosexual Agenda
Is this really the bipartisanship we are looking for? Or have the homosexual groups seen fit to join together to promote their agenda of special rights. I can't believe this group called 'Log Cabin' (no pun intended) calls itself 'Republican'. This is some sick stuff if it has gone this far in being normalized. What has our society come to when we are now debating whether to give spousal benefits to groups of male sex partners?
2 posted on 11/25/2001 12:09:19 PM PST by RobertBauman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobertBauman
Is this really the bipartisanship we are looking for?

Politics really does make for STRANGE BEDFELLOWS after all.

I guess the LCR must be happy about the administrations choice of ambassador to Romania ,Mr. Richard Guest.

3 posted on 11/25/2001 12:13:42 PM PST by Captain Shady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobertBauman
REDHEADED DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS UNITE TO SUPPORT FAMILIES OF TERROR VICTIMS

See how silly this is.

4 posted on 11/25/2001 12:14:19 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I noticed that too. A friend who works for WorldNetDaily sent me the press release and it originated from the group called 'Log Cabin', the homosexual 'Republicans'. But then they issued the press release spinning it as some kind of 'bipartisan' effort to help victims of Sept. 11th. Yet if you read the press release, it's just the same old stuff in which the homosexual militants are asking male-male sex partnerships or even groups of sex partners to be given the benefits of families and normal married couples. On its face, it is totally whacked.
5 posted on 11/25/2001 12:18:27 PM PST by RobertBauman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RobertBauman
GAY DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS UNITE TO SUPPORT FAMILIES OF TERROR VICTIMS

Big Deal
Who Cares
6 posted on 11/25/2001 12:18:39 PM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The dreaded, intolerant heterosexuals also united to support victim's families.

Will wonders never cease?

7 posted on 11/25/2001 12:18:40 PM PST by martian_22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
Must you keep thrusting your redheadedness in my face?

And that other thing, too... :)

8 posted on 11/25/2001 12:18:49 PM PST by Oschisms
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RobertBauman
fr reaching a new low by posting this crap.
9 posted on 11/25/2001 12:25:24 PM PST by jungleboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
REDHEADED DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS UNITE TO SUPPORT FAMILIES OF TERROR VICTIMS

Never could figure why folks frequently threaten to slap someone like a RED-HEADED STEPCHILD.

Most illogical isn't it?

10 posted on 11/25/2001 12:29:04 PM PST by Captain Shady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix
"Big Deal. Who Cares"

That's exactly what the homosexual activists are aiming for. When our culture is transformed enough so that when when your son Gary comes home and brings another boy, Bruce, as his date and parents just shrug "who cares", the homosexual crowd know they have won. Does anyone believe any more in the values and moral character this country was founded on? I doubt Thomas Jefferson or Ben Franklin would have just said "who cares" to homosexual special rights and normalization.

11 posted on 11/25/2001 12:30:44 PM PST by RobertBauman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jungleboy
WorldNetDaily got it right: Standing Up Against Evil
12 posted on 11/25/2001 12:37:46 PM PST by RobertBauman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OWK
Bump for a return to core Republican values.
13 posted on 11/25/2001 12:39:00 PM PST by RobertBauman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RobertBauman
That's exactly what the homosexual activists are aiming for.....

I agree with you.
My comment was aimed at the "so called" political aspect.
(Bi-partisanship)if you will.
I should have commented further to make that clear.
14 posted on 11/25/2001 12:45:27 PM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RobertBauman
"Bump for a return to core Republican values."

And bump again.

15 posted on 11/25/2001 12:47:41 PM PST by Salem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RobertBauman
First of all, to imply that the average gay person is monogamous is false. I would be interested in seeing a study done on the percentages, and I don't mean have you been monogamous this WEEK.

Secondly, these people can make wills just like anyone else. It sounds like a lot of greed to me. Available money brings a lot of open hands.

Also, what exactly is their loss, other than the same pain and grief suffered by friends and co-workers and extended families who cry and mourn but receive no cash.

This is nothing more than a backdoor approach to marriage---pun not intended but obvious. I think if they get charity money for a partner they had better be required also to pay the partners debt, taxes, and other outstanding liabilities.

16 posted on 11/25/2001 1:34:27 PM PST by Media2Powerful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Media2Powerful
First of all, to imply that the average gay person is monogamous is false. I would be interested in seeing a study done on the percentages, and I don't mean have you been monogamous this WEEK.

True...but then, implying that the average American is monogamous would be false, and vastly more so if one took Christ's definition.

17 posted on 11/25/2001 1:40:43 PM PST by Marathon Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Marathon Man
Hmm...you are right about that. What do you think of my point that they'd be getting benefits without the same liabilites, i.e. debt obligation, tax obligation, etc..? Married people pay their joint taxes, shared debt, etc.. It looks to me like it should either be both liabilities and assets, or none of the above. Why should someone get domestic partner death benefits without having to pay the partners credit card debt and the like?
18 posted on 11/25/2001 1:48:18 PM PST by Media2Powerful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RobertBauman
An intersting public relations device, but it won't change my evaluation of them and their life style.
19 posted on 11/25/2001 1:51:09 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Media2Powerful
Totally with you on that. Privilges and responsibilities should go hand in hand. I personally don't care whether or not gays and lesbians can be married in the eyes of the law because wedlock, to me, doesn't depend on the government for legitimacy. My wife would still be my wife even if the government didn't recognize the marriage.
20 posted on 11/25/2001 2:01:39 PM PST by Marathon Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson