[RobertBauman]

Is this really the bipartisanship we are looking for? Or have the homosexual groups seen fit to join together to promote their agenda of special rights. I can't believe this group called 'Log Cabin' (no pun intended) calls itself 'Republican'. This is some sick stuff if it has gone this far in being normalized. What has our society come to when we are now debating whether to give spousal benefits to groups of male sex partners?

[blam]

REDHEADED DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS UNITE TO SUPPORT FAMILIES OF TERROR VICTIMS

See how silly this is.

[Fiddlstix]

GAY DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS UNITE TO SUPPORT FAMILIES OF TERROR VICTIMS

Big Deal
Who Cares

[jungleboy]

fr reaching a new low by posting this crap.

[Media2Powerful]

First of all, to imply that the average gay person is monogamous is false. I would be interested in seeing a study done on the percentages, and I don't mean have you been monogamous this WEEK.

Secondly, these people can make wills just like anyone else. It sounds like a lot of greed to me. Available money brings a lot of open hands.

Also, what exactly is their loss, other than the same pain and grief suffered by friends and co-workers and extended families who cry and mourn but receive no cash.

This is nothing more than a backdoor approach to marriage---pun not intended but obvious. I think if they get charity money for a partner they had better be required also to pay the partners debt, taxes, and other outstanding liabilities.

[RLK]

An intersting public relations device, but it won't change my evaluation of them and their life style.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

To allow an institution of homosexual marriage in a monogamous form requires some sort of moralistic meandering to justify it and prohibit any form of polygamy. Upon what basis, if we are to assume it is discrimminatory to not allow homosexuals to "marry," can there be a prohibition of the varying forms of polygamy? Especially, since the First Amendment is specific in forbidding an establishment of religion in the law and is supposed to protect the people's right to assemble peaceably? The entire issue of "same-sex" marriage hinges upon the assumption that monogamy is the only form of marriage. I contend that it is based upon human biological reproduction and is outside of the government's authority to regulate in regard to the First Amendment...

[Kevin Curry]

And if they weren't "gay" they wouldn't have done it?

There are probably closet pedophiles donating to the families, too. Should they annouce their perversion publicly in the hope of gaining acceptance on account of the support they have provided?

The New Gay Motto: "I'm a real swell guy. If you will love me, you must love my perversion. After all, I am my perversion."

[lavaroise]

Is there such a thing as a gay republican?.... What means conservative then?