Skip to comments.
CONYERS CALLS FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES HEARINGS
Drudge ^
| 11/14/01
| Mark Benjamin of www.insider.com
Posted on 11/16/2001 1:09:11 PM PST by Elkiejg
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: Elkiejg
Is this before or after he has hearings on baseball contraction.
To: Elkiejg; Dan from Michigan
conyers has always been a twit, he is currently a twit and he will always be a twit.
dan -- care to comment
42
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:41 PM PST
by
mlocher
To: mercy
Thankyou jumpin jim jeffords.If your entire effort depends on one horse, you have bigger problems than you think.
Jeffords was never a Republican anyway and being a Republican nowadays doesn't mean a damn thing anyway. They have caved into or adopted most of the liberals plans.
To: Magnum44
'easily manipulated'? As if Judges are exempt from this category?
I suppose the 'donning' of black robes, changes people instantly to some sort of 'God-Like fashion.'
To: Elkiejg
You don't believe that everyone desrves the same respect? I think that'll come back to haunt ya Jethro.
45
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:51 PM PST
by
mxbluto
Comment #46 Removed by Moderator
Comment #47 Removed by Moderator
To: Elkiejg
Conyers and his Socialist Democrat buddies are only a half step behind these Arab Barbaric Spies who will be tried in our country and who are still throughout our Society.
People who intend harm to our citizens,and our country, like the WTC Bombing do not deserve equal Protection.
. That wouldn't bother Conyers, He's too busy making sure People like Clinton can sell the country out.
I think President Bush has got it right and we don't need any comments from the likes of Conyers and his Socialist Buddies in the Democrat party.
48
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:51 PM PST
by
chatham
The Progressive Caucus/Democratic Socialists of America crowd strikes again. Good, as always, to know whose side they're on.
To: Elkiejg
Mr. Conyers, you are either with us or you are with the terrorists.
Decide.
To: chatham
What you said!... Except, I would add that Conyers ought to have his citizenship revoke and be 'exported' to the Moon, to be kept company by Jackson-Fleas and Maxine Dirtwaters.
51
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:52 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
To: Elkiejg
He Would
To: Peter W. Kessler
Mr. Conyers, you are either with us or you are with the terrorists. That should not come at the expense of civil liberties, however. I agree with the "spirit" of Conyer's "concern" for our civil liberties. However, given his unparralled record of promoting laws designed to destroy the power of the individual, I am more than a little wary of his true motives. What is the Arab population like in his district...
To: amundsen
The purpose he nailed. However, it is the democratic form of government that is to blame. If we had a limited in power republic confederation then we wouldn't be at the point where I have to admit a Democrat is doing the right thing. I think you ought to read post 21 by Magnum44. He obviously understands the purpose and the process being implemented. I'm not sure you understand it, at least your post doesn't imply that you do. Respectfully.....GG
To: KeepTheEdge
I suppose the 'donning' of black robes, changes people instantly to some sort of 'God-Like fashion.' No, but most judges, and particularly military judges, are professionals, they are well versed in the law; they do not let shifty lawyers misguide them, and they understand the importance of the role that they fill in both administering justice, and in maintaining the public faith in the justice system through proper adminstration of justice.
But mostly, the military justice system is not backlogged with three years of case load and other delays that would make a mockery of justice to these terrorist, and in fact does make a mockery of justice in our criminal system.
55
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:56 PM PST
by
Magnum44
To: joeyman
The 4th amendment isn't going to mean squat if we all wind up dead because we've tied our own hands behind our backs. There has to be room for applying reason.
To: Elkiejg
Conyers is only interested in disrupting the country, and personal gain.
He has no interest in representing the people, he proved that in every attempt he made in derailing the impeachment proceedings!
Comment #58 Removed by Moderator
To: WALLACE212
Peolple have this knee jerk reaction that anything "military" is by definition unfair. Its all the media 'indoctrination' and the result of an failing education system that no longer teaches people to reason for themselves.
59
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:59 PM PST
by
Magnum44
Comment #60 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson