Skip to comments.
CONYERS CALLS FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES HEARINGS
Drudge ^
| 11/14/01
| Mark Benjamin of www.insider.com
Posted on 11/16/2001 1:09:11 PM PST by Elkiejg
WASHINGTON, Nov. 14 (UPI) -- House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member John Conyers, D-Mich., said Wednesday a decision by President George W. Bush that terrorist suspects might face a military tribunal adds to questions about civil liberties.
In a Nov. 14 letter to Committee Chairman Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., Conyers called for hearings on civil liberties, including an administration plan to monitor some defendants' communication with their lawyers, and the status of suspects detained in the government's investigations of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
Conyers said Bush's Tuesday decision to establish military tribunals run by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld only adds to his concern.
"Indeed, the very purpose of the directive appears to be to skirt the usual constitutional and criminal justice rules that are the hallmark of our democratic form of government."
While Sensenbrenner did not return calls seeking comment, Conyers' request comes one day after United Press International reported that Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., might soon hold hearings on the new government policy on monitoring communication between defense attorneys and their clients, and the status of what lawmakers said could be 1,000 people detained by the government. Some of those detainees have reportedly been released.
Leahy twice sent letters to Attorney General John Ashcroft on the issues on Oct. 31 and Nov. 9.
"We also have received no cooperation from the Justice Department in our effort to obtain information regarding the 1,000 plus immigrants who have been detained in connection with the terrorism investigation, as reflected in a letter that several Democratic Members transmitted to the attorney general on Oct. 31, 2001," Conyers wrote to Sensenbrenner Wednesday. "We would be remiss in our duties, however, if we did not also oversee the extent to which the Department may be abusing its authority and wrongfully targeting innocent Americans."
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Here go the DemoRATS again!! Sorry, I don't believe the illegal aliens have the same rights as American citizens.
1
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:11 PM PST
by
Elkiejg
(ELKIEGJ@AOL.COM)
To: Elkiejg
It's widely known that Conyers get a lot of moolah omar from the Muslims in the Detroit area.
2
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:11 PM PST
by
rebdov
To: Elkiejg
You're right. Illegal aliens don't enjoy constitutional rights.
The point is moot as far as they are concerned. Once they become citizens, then can they enjoy the rights.
3
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:12 PM PST
by
rdb3
To: Elkiejg
Tell old Coke-Bottle Glasses to mumble about this to himself and to stay out of the public eye.
To: Elkiejg
Since when do non resident/non citizens get rights under our constitution?
To: Elkiejg
They're not citizens, case closed.
6
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:13 PM PST
by
pubmom
To: Elkiejg
Let the Dems scream about this, in fact, let them scream and make fools of themselves in hearings shown on TV. Let them argue for the rights of terrorists to "OJ" type defense and sensational trial.
Most Americans see the issue clearly, illegal aliens don't have Constitutional rights.
7
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:13 PM PST
by
dawn53
To: Elkiejg
It is not they are illegal aliens, but instead they are saboteurs who have declared warn on the US and do not wear a uniform. Beacuse of this, if caught they are military prisoners of the war they declared on the US and should be treated as such. In the case of out of uniform soldiers, they are hung as spies.
8
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:13 PM PST
by
BobWNY
To: rdb3
You're right. Illegal aliens don't enjoy constitutional rights. The point is moot as far as they are concerned. Once they become citizens, then can they enjoy the rights. After the misappropriately named Patriot Legislation, apparently even Americans don't have these rights. Read the Constitution - especially the 4th Ammendment and tell me the govt hasn't gutted it.
9
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:13 PM PST
by
joeyman
To: Elkiejg
Go ahead and have the hearings. From a purely political perspective, I don't think carping about the rights of terrorists is going to help the Democrats much.
10
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:13 PM PST
by
SJackson
To: joeyman
Encroachment on our civil liberties definitely concerns me.
But this is not over.
11
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:14 PM PST
by
rdb3
To: Elkiejg
Where the haell was conyers when Elian was arrested,detained and deported?
12
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:14 PM PST
by
JPJones
To: Elkiejg
You just linked to the demoRATS parody of Drudge!
To: Elkiejg
Im surprised it was a Dem doing the hollering. Terrorists have no Constitutional rights, period. What is of concern here though is the blanket seizure of anyone and not being allowed due process ...even POW's ! Today they took the Christians and I didn't care cause ... Both the holding of prisoners in an undocumented fashion,and the creation of an illegal Military tribunal are methods designed to lull us into submission. Infringements passed today will never be repealed in four years or eight years or ever !
14
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:15 PM PST
by
Marobe
To: Elkiejg
John Conyers is a poor excuse for a representative. I'm surprised that Maxine Waters didn't jump in with him. I hope the people from Detroit pay close attention to his actions.
To: Elkiejg
For want of a nail the shoe was lost. For want of a shoe the horse was lost. For want of a horse the battle was lost. For want of the battle the war was lost. For want of the war the Kingdom was lost.
Thankyou jumpin jim jeffords.
16
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:15 PM PST
by
mercy
To: Elkiejg
Conyers? Sanity hearings, maybe. Competency hearings, certainly.
17
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:16 PM PST
by
BibChr
To: rebdov
Conyers also wears that little colorful knit muslim hat
To: Elkiejg
F him.....
To: leadpencil1
my dad used to have a stamp for requests like this...it said, "BULL$HIT DISAPPROVED".
20
posted on
11/16/2001 1:09:28 PM PST
by
Keith
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson