Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush: If McCain had fought for strong military instead of campaign finance "reform", ...
limbaugh program ^ | oct 30, 01 | rush limbaugh

Posted on 10/30/2001 3:27:24 PM PST by laureldrive

On his radio show today, Rush noted McCain's public dissing of Bush for not being strong enough in tactics and strategy vs. Afghanistan and the Taliban. Rush said, if McCain had been putting his energy into fighting against military cuts, instead of fighting for anti-GOP campaign finance "reform," maybe we'd be better situated to take out the Taliban fast. And anyway, why is McCain joining Dems like Kerry and Biden in publicly beating up on Bush's prosecution of the war? Folks, he's a camera hog - and realizes that bashing the GOP is his ticket to face time on the networks. FOR A REAL SENATE MAJORITY, THE GOP NEEDS FOUR SEATS - - - one to get them to 50; two more to cancel out DEMS IN DISQUISE McCain and Chafee, and one more to give them a one vote majority over the combined Dems plus McCain and Chafee.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: VA Advogado
I'll Bump that , no excuses for getting an education here in Freerepublic .
81 posted on 10/31/2001 7:29:14 AM PST by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
if McCain had been putting his energy into fighting against military cuts, instead of fighting for anti-GOP campaign finance "reform,"

McLame is THE REASON for the cuts...

S.258
Sponsor: Sen McCain, John (introduced 1/20/1999)
Latest Major Action: 1/20/1999 Referred to Senate committee

Title: A bill to authorize additional rounds of base closures and realignments under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 in 2001 and 2003, and for other purposes.

Source: Thomas Legislative Archives

Inhofe said McCain has supported base closings that could threaten South Carolina facilities, voted against technology improvements in the military and has a poor voting record in supporting military growth, according to the Center for Security Policy, a pro-military watchdog organization.

FR Article

There was more good news for AFGE Activists in DoD. The Pentagon was prevented from achieving its preeminent legislative objective: additional rounds of Base Closure and Realignment (BRAC). As AFGE Legislative Dateline had predicted last week after two failed attempts at the Senate Armed Services Committee mark up, BRAC is dead for this year. Indeed, BRAC is likely dead for the rest of the 106th Congress since 2000 is an election year and most lawmakers would be unlikely to support BRAC when their careers are at stake. Nevertheless, Senators John McCain (R-AZ), Carl Levin (D-MI), and Charles Robb (D-VA) mounted a strong attempt at imposing more BRAC earlier this week during floor consideration of the defense authorization bill. However, their amendment failed by a vote of 60-40.

American Federation of Govt. Employees Bulletin, May 28, 1999

82 posted on 10/31/2001 7:30:04 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dorben
The REVERSE is true also Dorben , so pay attention !
83 posted on 10/31/2001 7:33:05 AM PST by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: sobieski
Have you any experience at all in a combat zone?
84 posted on 10/31/2001 9:06:15 AM PST by Chapita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Your assessment puts Clinton ahead of McCain. I find that surprising.
85 posted on 10/31/2001 12:28:32 PM PST by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Let's agree with you, Rush has limited military and historical knowledge. Given that, McCain is still an idiot, and his knowledge PALES in comparison with that of the alleged puny brain Rush.
86 posted on 10/31/2001 12:35:13 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sakic
Hey, merely fighting in Vietnam is enough to give McCain credibility with you, then I assume you also listen with reverence to Oliver Stone, another viet vet. As for myself, I listen to what a guy says - whether it makes sense or not - and dont' judge the worth of his comments by whether he was wearing a uniform in 1967. And McCain's comments these days are usually worthless.
87 posted on 10/31/2001 12:50:12 PM PST by laureldrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: sakic
Your assessment puts Clinton ahead of McCain. I find that surprising.

Oh really. I don't remember Rush writing a lying letter to his draft board and setting up demonstartions in England against the war like Clinton.

So let's see here sakic, first you come up to the defense of a person who should never had gotten his "wings", but got them anyway due to family connections(McCain).

And now you are defending a person who "in writing" lied to his draft board and also when escaping the country decided to lead demonstrations against his country(Clinton).

You are 0 for 2 sakic. Three strikes and you are out.

88 posted on 10/31/2001 1:08:27 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Chapita
Have you any experience at all in a combat zone?

If you were to pick a driver for your limo would you go with someone with no record or a failed record?

89 posted on 10/31/2001 2:49:33 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: sakic
Did you have a chance to read that Free Republic thread I posted 12 hours ago on the evil of McCain or are you still too busy here on this thread defending him?
90 posted on 10/31/2001 2:52:20 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
Maybe the impeach/recall McCain freepers need to go back into action. For victory & freedom!!!
91 posted on 10/31/2001 2:56:23 PM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
So let's see here sakic, first you come up to the defense of a person who should never had gotten his "wings", but got them anyway due to family connections(McCain).

Which is worse, going to fight for your country even if you may be underqualified or avoiding it at all costs like 95% of Congress?

And now you are defending a person who "in writing" lied to his draft board and also when escaping the country decided to lead demonstrations against his country(Clinton).

I never defended Clinton here but I guess you need to post an outright lie in order to try and prove your point. It's your logic that avoiding the draft is better than going to fight.

You are 0 for 2 sakic. Three strikes and you are out.

So far you've thrown a ball and a wild pitch. The count is 2-0. Two more and I walk to first.

92 posted on 10/31/2001 3:05:34 PM PST by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
Did you have a chance to read that Free Republic thread I posted 12 hours ago on the evil of McCain or are you still too busy here on this thread defending him?

I guess I have to apologize for working at my job for a few hours and commuting. Some of us don't have as much free time as others. I'll read it at my leisure but your attitude to me makes you seem a bit like a rabid dog.

93 posted on 10/31/2001 3:08:05 PM PST by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: sakic
Which is worse, going to fight for your country even if you may be underqualified or avoiding it at all costs like 95% of Congress?

I don't know let me ask you, which is worse. An inept person flying a plane(McCain) even though that everybody knows that person is inept and keeps thier mouths shut because they will get heat from his family(military brass) or that inept person finding another line of work that is more suited for him.

94 posted on 10/31/2001 3:15:47 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
Wouldn't make any difference if I was looking for someone with the possibility of understanding a certain conversation!
95 posted on 10/31/2001 4:16:26 PM PST by Chapita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: sakic
I guess I have to apologize for working at my job for a few hours and commuting. Some of us don't have as much free time as others. I'll read it at my leisure but your attitude to me makes you seem a bit like a rabid dog.

Rabid in my dislike for McSHAME, definately. Not rabid in my attitude towards you. You're not a postal worker by chance?

96 posted on 10/31/2001 7:23:21 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I prefer courage over cowardice especially when the cowards go on to portray themselves as tough guys.
97 posted on 11/01/2001 1:40:29 AM PST by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
Not a postal worker, thankfully. Currently the most dangerous job in America.
98 posted on 11/01/2001 1:42:05 AM PST by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: sakic
I prefer courage over cowardice especially when the cowards go on to portray themselves as tough guys.

Then I guess you prefer the "courage" of Clinton who wrote a lying letter to his draft board and then showed more of your type of "courage" when he spitted in his country's face by organizing demonstrations in England.

99 posted on 11/01/2001 1:49:53 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I prefer courage over cowardice especially when the cowards go on to portray themselves as tough guys.

Then I guess you prefer the "courage" of Clinton who wrote a lying letter to his draft board and then showed more of your type of "courage" when he spitted in his country's face by organizing demonstrations in England.

Are you Mr. Opposite? Which of the 2 groups I mentioned does Clinton fall into? Read, then type.

100 posted on 11/01/2001 2:52:09 AM PST by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson