To: Dane
Your assessment puts Clinton ahead of McCain. I find that surprising.
85 posted on
10/31/2001 12:28:32 PM PST by
sakic
To: sakic
Hey, merely fighting in Vietnam is enough to give McCain credibility with you, then I assume you also listen with reverence to Oliver Stone, another viet vet. As for myself, I listen to what a guy says - whether it makes sense or not - and dont' judge the worth of his comments by whether he was wearing a uniform in 1967. And McCain's comments these days are usually worthless.
To: sakic
Your assessment puts Clinton ahead of McCain. I find that surprising. Oh really. I don't remember Rush writing a lying letter to his draft board and setting up demonstartions in England against the war like Clinton.
So let's see here sakic, first you come up to the defense of a person who should never had gotten his "wings", but got them anyway due to family connections(McCain).
And now you are defending a person who "in writing" lied to his draft board and also when escaping the country decided to lead demonstrations against his country(Clinton).
You are 0 for 2 sakic. Three strikes and you are out.
88 posted on
10/31/2001 1:08:27 PM PST by
Dane
To: sakic
Did you have a chance to read that Free Republic thread I posted 12 hours ago on the evil of McCain or are you still too busy here on this thread defending him?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson