Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: habs4ever
More to the point, MAD assumes each side has the ability to destroy the other. The radical Islamic nations have the ability to terrorize our population, but they do not have the ability to destroy our nation, or even put up a signficant opposition to our military.

Still, if this is BioWar (and it sure looks everything like that, as inept in the end as it may turn out to be) then a barrier has been breached that allows the U.S., at the discretion of our national command authority, to respond with weapons of mass destruction.

I doubt we do so, because we can defeat our opponents militarily without using WMD. However, some regimes are going to fall. I do not think the current governments of Syria or Iraq will survive this war. Nor, honestly, do I think that the governments of Libya, Sudan, Algeria or Iran stand a good chance of surviving. Iran may raise the most eyebrows. It's long past time we punished that country.

39 posted on 10/12/2001 6:47:36 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Scott from the Left Coast
Still, if this is BioWar (and it sure looks everything like that, as inept in the end as it may turn out to be) then a barrier has been breached that allows the U.S., at the discretion of our national command authority, to respond with weapons of mass destruction.

Yes indeed.

41 posted on 10/12/2001 6:55:20 PM PDT by Lady GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Scott from the Left Coast
That's right, it isn't a fair fight, the other side gets its clock cleaned, permanently.Those idiots didn't that far ahead.
43 posted on 10/12/2001 6:58:38 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Scott from the Left Coast
Still, if this is BioWar (and it sure looks everything like that, as inept in the end as it may turn out to be) then a barrier has been breached that allows the U.S., at the discretion of our national command authority, to respond with weapons of mass destruction.

These attacks are hardly inept. They are clearly not intended to kill lots of people. Most likely, Saddam has tested the delivery mechanism quite thoroughly on political prisoners, and knows exactly what its limitations are. They are meant to send a message. You have to ask yourself the question, why this technique, and why now? It's as if you saw a known arab terrorist buying a plastic box-cutter at a Wal-Mart on 9/10. Why? It only makes sense in the context of the whole plan. What's the plan?

Alternatively, you could just stick your head in the sand and hope it doesn't mean anything at all.

44 posted on 10/12/2001 7:00:43 PM PDT by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson