Posted on 09/28/2001 4:18:10 PM PDT by knak
Our Political Bureau
NEW DELHI
MANY functionaries of the United States State Department, who handled South Asia under the Clinton Administration, may have to face embarrassment when the Bush regime gets down to locating the factors that made it easier for terrorists to carry out the September 11 carnage.
These functionaries, it is reliably learnt, ignored the warnings about the activities and intentions of the terrorist groups operating out of Afghanistan and Pakistan.
One of such reports had come from Michael Sheehan, the head of counter-terrorism wing of the State Department. Sheehans report also listed the measures that the US should have taken to prevent its homeland security from being breached.
The fact that his recommendations were ignored was one of the reasons why Sheehan left the State Department to take up a job with the United Nations.
Mention is also being made of the notes put up by the former assistant secretary of state for South Asia Karl Inderfurth. He is also believed to have alerted against the looming threat and asked for urgent remedial measures.
These facts are sure to surface once the Bush regime has taken care of its immediate priority: Retaliatory strike against the harbourers of terrorists.
While the aftermath of the terrorist attack has seen partisan quarrels taking the backseat, some uncomfortable questions about the failure to foil the terrorists are sure to be asked when the focus shifts to the domestic preparedness to deal with the threat.
Attention is sure to be focused on the role of Robin Raphel, former assistant secretary of state, in downplaying the threat from Taliban, as the gaze turns inwards.
The diplomat who had upset India by her insensitive remarks over Kashmir, aggressively pushed for staying engaged with the Taliban even when evidence available with the State Department pointed to the futility of winking at the abysmal human rights record and fundamentalist agenda of the clerics ruling from Kabul.
The examination of documents may give a new turn to the debate on whether there was an intelligence failure behind the success of the terrorists.
Sources, who are familiar with the contents of the reports submitted by the counter-terrorism and South Asia desks of the State Department, feel that attacks were perhaps facilitated by the failure to act on the intelligence available with it.
...and rinsed down the sink.
Only embarrassment? Maybe some firings or perhaps some indictments instead?
He was the person that taught me that what is in a news story is not nearly as important as what is not.
A reward for loyalty to the cause?
I think you may be right.....wish I had some info on this traitor......anyone out there know?
The long knives are out, and this writer has an axe to grind.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
I was thinking of a firing squad myself! (After being found guilty by a court of law of course.)
Source article
As the lady pointperson for South Asia, she also had to be mindful of what many cynics call here the "Robin Raphel fever." Ms. Raphel was sitting in Ms Rocca's seat during the first term of President Clinton from 1992 to 1996.
Those were very intense days of the freedom struggle in held Kashmir. But many in New Delhi kept suspecting as if the Americans were "fanning the trouble there" with conspiratorial winks and nods to various Kashmiri leaders.
Dr Fai, a US based "communication strategist" of Kashmiri origin, was considered the "conduit" and Raphel "the culprit." During Rocca's stay in New Delhi, Harish Khare, another writer on South Asian affairs, almost addressed her by concluding in another article for The Hindu: "The...task is to ensure that there is no outbreak of a Robin Raphel fever, once again in Washington (over Kashmir). Any show of American interest would complicate (things)."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.