Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New machine gun capable of firing 1 million rounds a minute
www.wired.com ^ | Sept. 28, 2001 | Stewart Taggart

Posted on 09/28/2001 7:36:38 AM PDT by webster

Edited on 06/29/2004 7:08:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

SYDNEY, Australia -- It may not be ready for George Bush's "first war of the 21st century." But it may well be ready if there's a second.

In perhaps the most audacious upgrade of high-speed weaponry since the introduction of the Gatling Gun, Australian inventor Mike O'Dwyer has developed a machine gun that can fire bullets at a rate of 1 million rounds per minute.


(Excerpt) Read more at wired.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: egarvue
We looked at this thing for last minute ship defense. It's practically useless - the rounds go everywhere.
21 posted on 09/28/2001 8:03:54 AM PDT by dieBartdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
Can you imagine the recoil on this thing?!

Actually the article claims lesser recoil.

Imagine the ammo bearers!

22 posted on 09/28/2001 8:04:25 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist
Way Cooooool.

Let's see: 1 million rounds in one minute, a tripod, and a lot of replacement machineguns and replacement barrels.

I can see it now.

Sarge, we've just been warned about an attack tonight..... Put the first million mom machine gun over in that corner, put the second one in that other corner, and park the 2 million ammo trucks behind the mess hall.

Make sure all the drivers get something to eat, and find out how many have even one ammo clip for their M-16.

23 posted on 09/28/2001 8:08:08 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
I don't know if you have read any of the Hammer's Slammers series by David Drake, but that photo looks similar to the anti personnel system that the tanks used. Not the same, though, as in the books the anti-personnel weapon was a replaceable strip that was essentially a big claymore mine designed with a proximity sensor to take out infantry/incoming missles.
24 posted on 09/28/2001 8:09:36 AM PDT by testforecho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bang_list, "all-electronic handgun" related
bang
25 posted on 09/28/2001 8:11:49 AM PDT by gnarledmaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
test test
26 posted on 09/28/2001 8:12:04 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dieBartdie
We looked at this thing for last minute ship defense. It's practically useless - the rounds go everywhere. "

In the killing of cancer cells by radiation therapy, the penumbra has saved many.

Terrorists are a lot like cancer.

27 posted on 09/28/2001 8:13:07 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
"Party poop."

LOL. This reminds me of the GE "SixPack", a 10,000 round per minute man portable mini gun (yes, the one in Predator). They made six of them. The only problem was lugging enough .30 cal around to make it useful. A classic example of "Can you carry this to the fight for me?"

28 posted on 09/28/2001 8:13:38 AM PDT by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
font fix?
29 posted on 09/28/2001 8:13:55 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
No, read it more carefully please.

There IS just as much net recoil force, since that is strictly determined by the physics of the number of bullets, their individual masses, and their speed.

What DOES happen is that there are many, many "hundred" bullets released from the barrels BEFORE the recoil (of the first few dozen bullets) jerks the barrel enough to disturb the aim.

Of course, once those first few hundred get shot somewhat accurately ----- THEN the recoil of the next few hundred throws the gun all over hell and creation........

30 posted on 09/28/2001 8:14:33 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: webster
Yep, read about this awhile back (I think in Discover). Cool name "Metal Storm". I want some of these mounted on one of those UFO looking hovercraft so that our military could use them to go into canyons, etc. and stay safer. If you had them on the hovercraft, and it spun while firing them off, you'd have a "metal tornado".

Now that would take care of some of the terrorist camps (at least better that a 2 million dollar missile hitting a 10 dollar tent).

31 posted on 09/28/2001 8:15:35 AM PDT by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webster
I wonder if someone with an electronic signal emitter could set this off from a distance. If we could, so could the enemy. Right?
32 posted on 09/28/2001 8:17:57 AM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webster
A million rounds a minute? I need a faster reloading setup. Time to call Midway...
33 posted on 09/28/2001 8:20:41 AM PDT by gieriscm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webster
Just don't stand in front of this thing. I imagine it must eat up some barrels. Is this a one-time use thing? Can you imagine how much it would cost to feed this sucker?
34 posted on 09/28/2001 8:20:43 AM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webster
You now owe me a kb as drool is more then likely going ot ruin this one .

Bang.

Cheese.

35 posted on 09/28/2001 8:20:44 AM PDT by AmericanCheeseFood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
"THEN the recoil of the next few hundred throws the gun all over hell and creation........

Exactly right. Why not just use a frangible metal in front of an explosive charge? Oh wait, that's called a land mind. LOL!

36 posted on 09/28/2001 8:21:08 AM PDT by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
"If we could, so could the enemy. Right? "

Well, if it were pointed toward the enemy, who would care, except the enemy?

37 posted on 09/28/2001 8:24:35 AM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: All
WHEEE! However, I'll take the Navy's CIWS (Close-In-Weapons-System) (See-Whiz) (Christ!-It-Won't-Shoot) (Artoo-Detoo-With-A-Hard-On) anyday..
38 posted on 09/28/2001 8:25:16 AM PDT by RandallFlagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Waste of ammunition, but who cares!!! I'll take two.
39 posted on 09/28/2001 8:26:15 AM PDT by gc4nra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gc4nra
"Waste of ammunition, but who cares!!! I'll take two. "

With appologies to Col. Jeff.

40 posted on 09/28/2001 8:27:41 AM PDT by gc4nra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson