Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unfree Republic
Lew Rockwell ^ | 9/24/01 | Jeff Elkins

Posted on 09/24/2001 3:10:00 AM PDT by Ada Coddington

Unfree Republic
by Jeff Elkins

Let the stench of Middle East flesh reach Paradise reassuring them that these filth have gone to hell permanently."

The quote above is representative of many posted on the FreeRepublic.com site in the wake of the WTC attack, and unfortunately its like is not uncommon elsewhere. Americans are angry, predictably and rightly so, but just as predictable are the side effects. As always, that righteous anger will be accepted as a beloved gift by the state and molded into tools of oppression.

It’s funny how that works. Every single state-sponsored war the US has become embroiled in has resulted in an inexorable increase in the power of the state.

It’s also funny that it’s always assumed that human behavior in the past has no relation to how we behave today. Why those people were old-fashioned, we’re modern, educated, etc.

The beginning of this repeating pattern has already become public with the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security. It has an ominous sound, that name, almost Germanic. (I can’t wait to see the uniforms.)

On April 13, 1917, days after our entry into World War One, President Wilson created the Committee on Public Information to promote the war domestically while publicizing American war aims abroad. Bush has replicated that step, with this new cabinet-level department.

Under the leadership of journalistic muckraker George Creel, the CPI was a propaganda apparatus unparalleled at that point in world history. The CPI functioned as a de facto public censor, vetting nearly all published material about the war and helping to draft legislation such as the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918. In the months prior to our entry into the war and especially after our entry when they were nearly criminal, antiwar viewpoints were rarely heard.

The same pattern emerges now: Penn. Gov. Tom Ridge will be President Bush’s George Creel, and just as in those dim days of yesteryear, he’ll have plenty of willing civilian accomplices. And after all, there’s so much more to censor -- Ridge will need all the help he can get. In seeking warriors for the front line of Internet censorship, Ridge needs look no farther than FreeRepublic.com. The atmosphere there is now poisonous.

Again, look back to Wilson's CPI. It encouraged businesses to spy on their employees, parents to spy on their children, children to spy on their parents, neighbors to spy on neighbors, and above all to report "disloyal," pro-German sentiments. State authorities banned the teaching of German in schools and changed German street names. As the madness mounted, those regarded as pro-German were hounded from their jobs, pressured to change their German names, beaten, and in a few cases lynched. Almost all cases of violence, while incited by the state, were carried out by "civilians" in the grip of war hysteria.

Along with this anti-German hysteria, Congress passed several measures designed to rigidly suppress criticism of the war. In particular, the Espionage Act, passed in June 1917, specified a fine of $10,000 or twenty years in prison for "whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully obstruct the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, and whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States, or the military or naval forces of the United States, or the flag."

The Espionage Act was very popular in its day. It was cheered on by mindless lemmings under the influence of state propaganda. Their great grandchildren now inhabit FreeRepublic.com, viciously attacking anyone who questions the wisdom of the state.

Our Congress is considering similar measures under the rubric of "anti-terrorism," and as it was at the beginning of the 20th Century, the FreeRepublic lemmings of the 21st are cheering the morally corrupt politicians along.

It’s not just message posters on the site. The management of FreeRepublic has instituted a "loose lips sink ships" campaign, with new moderators patrolling the forum to delete posts that in their opinion are detrimental to the "war effort."

The FreeRepublic mission statement claims "We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America."

Sanctimonious hogwash. Everything old is new again – the keyboard warriors of FreeRepublic would be right at home in 1917 shilling for Wilson.

September 24, 2001

Jeff Elkins is a freelance consultant and writer living in North Central Florida. His personal website is located at www.elkins.org.


TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 501-503 next last
To: Abundy
You stated your position quite well IMO.
261 posted on 09/24/2001 10:53:04 AM PDT by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

Comment #262 Removed by Moderator

To: ThomasJefferson
I'm glad you were free to post your opinion. And waste bandwidth talking about anything but the subjects at hand. If wanting to eliminate the enemies of the United States is war mongering, then so be it. But yell your opinion loud buddy, as there are over 7000 Americans who can no longer hear it. Read it. Or reply to you. And in a time of war, does being emotionally sensitive really matter that much?
263 posted on 09/24/2001 10:56:18 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: CarolynBe
Well, it may sound asanine to some people, but there are going to be some occasions when some "asanine" things are going to have to be set up to deal with the logistics of what is at hand. Like, when people all around the world read stuff like this on their computers.
264 posted on 09/24/2001 10:59:02 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
Let's not distinguish between leftists on the basis of their party labels. Most of the republicans in Congress could have run as democrats and would have if their constituents weren't so desirous of change and so easily fooled into thinking that the GOP is conservative.

The big difference we'll see between the two parties is that the democrats will embrace the creation of the police state enthusiastically while the republicans embrace it "reluctantly". Both will embrace it, though.

265 posted on 09/24/2001 11:00:59 AM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Storm Orphan
Your servant, sir.

Edd

266 posted on 09/24/2001 11:03:20 AM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Mercuria
Yep, the Partnership for a No-Knock America says it perfectly. Hats off to you, ma'am.
267 posted on 09/24/2001 11:06:51 AM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Osinski
You expect more of angelo? That's his modus operandi.
268 posted on 09/24/2001 11:07:40 AM PDT by Storm Orphan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Nuke'm Glowing
If a disruptor is someone who abhors the abuses by the far left and far right equally, then I am a disruptor.

Please identify the "far right" and your perception of their "abuses."

If a disruptor is someone who believes patriotic loyality to one's nation is more important than my petty political agenda at a time of war, then I am a disruptor.

Loyalty to one's nation and loyalty to a bunch of politicians who in the past have proven themselves to be cowardly, self serving and opportunistic are not the same thing. Such loyalties are not interchangeable. Some of us recognize and understand that. Do you think that some of the most crooked, treacherous creeps on both sides of the aisle have suddenly found virtue in the last couple of weeks? Do you think that the few who are well meaning but incredibly stupid have suddenly received an infusion of intellect and cognitive reasoning capabilities?

Instead of permitting ourselves to be drunk on a cocktail mix of hand-wringing hysteria and testerone, some of us prefer to think, question, and maintain vigilant watch over those people elected and appointed to preserve our system of government - particularly the individual liberties and responsibilities that make our nation unique in all the world.

Why would any TRUE patriot have a problem with that?

269 posted on 09/24/2001 11:08:10 AM PDT by another1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

Comment #270 Removed by Moderator

To: Jim Robinson
Well Said!
271 posted on 09/24/2001 11:12:11 AM PDT by FFIGHTER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Osinski
I gave the links, bub. Anyone can go back and read the context, should they so choose. Furthermore, I think demidog's position was pretty clearly stated. He personally opposed child porn. But he was against laws prohibiting possession. He was quite clear about this. And this is all that sinkspur noted. You and a few others refused to believe this, which is why I went back and dug up quotes from demidog himself. If you disagree, perhaps you can go back, and dig up quotes of his which contradict what I posted. Short of that, I stand by my characterization of his remarks.
272 posted on 09/24/2001 11:12:30 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Osinski
I might add that it is unnecessary for demidog to be here to defend himself. His remarks, and his explanation of his remarks, are on the record for anyone wishing to take a few minutes to look it up.
273 posted on 09/24/2001 11:13:56 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Twodees
Thank you for mentioning the lefty Horowitz. And in another paragraph the word neocon!

Light bulb just went on.....now I fully understand why Horowitz despises Dr. Alan Keyes and wrote so disparingly of him.

And to think, he's the guest speaker on the 'big boat' trip. LOL.

274 posted on 09/24/2001 11:14:25 AM PDT by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Twodees
The big difference we'll see between the two parties is that the democrats will embrace the creation of the police state enthusiastically while the republicans embrace it "reluctantly". Both will embrace it, though.

Left and right may be irrelevant in this case.

Leftists like the idea of the police state for social reasons.

Those on the right support it in the name of law and order.

Throw all those campaign contributions in from those who seek to make a profit on the technology involved, and the combination is almost unbeatable.

When are Americans going to hold their government responsible for this mess?

275 posted on 09/24/2001 11:14:31 AM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Mercuria
Partnership For A No-Knock America

LMAO...Thanks, merc!

276 posted on 09/24/2001 11:16:03 AM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
DITTO!DITTO!DITTO!

Some people just do not understand the danger all of us are in!

Thanks, Jim, from all of us.

277 posted on 09/24/2001 11:17:23 AM PDT by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Nuke'm Glowing
I'm not a member of either of your 2 groups and I still find your nick offensive (But considering mine, have been quiet)
278 posted on 09/24/2001 11:18:50 AM PDT by Postal Worker with a gun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Nuke'm Glowing
If wanting to eliminate the enemies of the United States is war mongering, then so be it.

You have changed your tune a little, just a few days ago you were advocating wiping out millions upon millions of innocent people with nukes, now you say just the enemies.

BTW, we aren't at war, it's a euphemism. They are making war on us, and our congress has not seen fit to declare war on them, yet. We are engaged in some preliminary preparations and investigations. After we do that, I hope the congress has the balls to declare war on the proper people and eradicate them. I will be disappointed in another "war" without declaration, in violation of the constitution.

Now back to the question, what was your screen name before? Your main purpose in being here is to trash libertarians, not talk about the attack. Cmon, be a man, don't lie and say you never posted here before.

279 posted on 09/24/2001 11:19:05 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Sandy, Mercuria
Partnership For A No-Knock America

Agreed, Sandy. That goes in my "stolen for future use"* file.

*royalty payments forthcoming</font size>

280 posted on 09/24/2001 11:20:34 AM PDT by Storm Orphan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 501-503 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson