Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Bombing' of TWA Flight 800: Reed Irvine reveals new admissions by Stephanopoulos and Kallstrom
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Thursday, September 20, 2001 | Reed Irvine

Posted on 09/20/2001 12:47:40 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

WND Commentary
The 'bombing' of TWA Flight 800


By Reed Irvine
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com

Over five years have passed since the crash of TWA Flight 800 killed 230 people, and now, at long last, two former high-ranking government officials speaking on television have implicitly disavowed the claim that a fuel-tank explosion caused the destruction of that airplane.

The government's $40 million investigation of the crash of TWA Flight 800 ended up with the National Transportation Safety Board, the FBI and the CIA all agreeing that an explosion in the center-wing fuel tank caused it to crash. They said that after the explosion broke off the entire front end of the plane, its tail dropped and it shot up like a rocket, trailing burning fuel behind it. They said that was what hundreds of eyewitnesses saw, mistaking it for a missile. The CIA actually produced a video showing the huge noseless jet ascending like a rocket, an aeronautical impossibility.

They got away with it because our establishment media in the Clinton era had the bad habit of believing nearly everything government agencies told them, even if it was patently ridiculous. But now, a former White House official, George Stephanopoulos, who was a senior adviser to President Clinton, has made a statement on television that indicates that the claim that a fuel-tank explosion caused the TWA 800 crash was false. On September 11, the unforgettable day of disaster, Stephanopoulos, who is now an ABC News correspondent, was talking to ABC's Peter Jennings on camera about President Bush being flown to Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska and taken to the situation room on the base where he could keep in touch with Washington by teleconferencing.

Stephanopoulos, implying that this was unnecessary, made this surprising statement: "There are facilities in the White House, not the normal situation room, which everyone has seen in the past, has seen pictures of. There is a second situation room, behind the primary situation room, which has video conferencing capabilities. The director of the Pentagon, the defense chief, can speak from a national military command center at the Pentagon. The Secretary of State can speak from the State Department, the president from wherever he is, and they'll have this capability for video conferencing throughout this crisis. In my time at the White House it was used in the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing, in the aftermath of the TWA Flight 800 bombing, and that would be the way they would stay in contact through the afternoon."

The TWA Flight 800 bombing? Peter Jennings, the anchorman for ABC's "World News Tonight," didn't bat an eyelash. Instead of asking his colleague to explain his use of the word "bombing" and why there was a special meeting in the White House situation room to discuss it, Jennings asked a question about the president taking orders from the Secret Service.

Efforts to reach Mr. Stephanopoulos to find out if he has information that the plane was destroyed by a bomb have been unsuccessful, and no one at ABC News recognized that Stephanopoulos had revealed that he was privy to what might be a very important change in the story about TWA 800. When informed of this, Brian Ross, who heads ABC News's investigative unit, promised to look into it.

There had to be something special about the TWA 800 crash to justify holding a meeting in the White House situation room to discuss it. That surely is not done every time one of our planes crashes. Stephanopoulos said that it was held in the "aftermath of the bombing," but the precise date and time are important.

In his book, "The Downing of TWA Flight 800," James Sanders says that there was a meeting in the White House situation room on the night of July 17, 1996, that began before the crash. Sanders says that he was told by a confidential source that high officials gathered there to watch in real time a video transmission of a Navy demonstration of its ability to shoot down a missile off the shore of Long Island. They were horrified when something went wrong and they saw the missile shoot down TWA Flight 800. What Stephanopoulos should tell us is whether the meeting he described began before or after the plane crashed. If he won't reveal that, the White House should.

The fuel-tank theory of the crash was also disavowed by James Kallstrom, who headed the FBI investigation. He said on CNN on September 11 that the attack that day was "the first act of terrorism in the U.S. since TWA 800." He has yet to explain when he discovered that TWA 800 was brought down by terrorists.


Reed Irvine is the chairman of Accuracy In Media, a media watchdog group based in Washington, D.C.

For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: twa800list
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last
To: Tymesup
Hey, thanks. My take also, that in the heat of the current situation they inadvertently told some truth. I'm weighing "bombing" vs. 'missile attack' or 'shoot-down'. Sometimes I myself have mentally used 'bombing' as a shorthand for 'missile attack' and wonder if George does too.
81 posted on 09/21/2001 10:07:51 AM PDT by smorgle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe
Actually nothing in a luquid state can burn

You are taking my comment out of context. I was responding to another comment regarding the inability of scientists to ignite vapors in the lab. Yellow Rose of Texas said "If jet fuel does not explode then were the WTC buildings on fire from candles?", and I responded that jet fuel is not explosive like gasoline, it burns more smoothly.

I realize that oxygen is needed and I was not saying that it wasn't. If a flammable liquid is enclosed in a container with no air, combustion is not possible, like you say. However, liquids can burn if oxygen is present in the vapors above the fuel. Pour alcohol into a saucepan and light it. It burns. Technically it is the vapor immediately on the surface that is burning, not the liquid itself. The situation in the fuel tank is not like this, however. The fuel tank has some gas above the liquid inside, but there is very little oxygen present. It would be either a vacuum or carbon dioxide (depending on how the fuel system handles the evacuation of fuel). This is what the scientists did in the lab. They had re-created the environment inside the fuel tank and could not get the vapor to explode, because there was not enough oxygen. This is why I do not believe that a fuel tank explosion was the cause. If they had done the same experiment with gasoline, I'm sure it would have exploded because gasoline is much more volatile.

The point I was making to YROT was that jet fuel DOES burn, it doesn't explode like gasoline. It is a fuel which is not as volatile as others, which is why the vapors would not ignite.

82 posted on 09/21/2001 1:00:00 PM PDT by Come get it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Come get it
Sorry I read it wrong. My experiences with JP-5 have found it to be closer to diesel fuel in it's ignition or flame point. If I'm not mistaken the Navy can on smaller engines like a Detroit 671 with a few adjustments interchange the fuels.
83 posted on 09/21/2001 2:27:02 PM PDT by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

Comment #84 Removed by Moderator

To: cva66snipe
My experiences with JP-5 have found it to be closer to diesel fuel in it's ignition or flame point

Exactly. A much smoother, and longer, burn. This is what contributed to the collapse of the towers. The fuel burned so slowly (almost an hour) that it weakened the steel in the building.

85 posted on 09/21/2001 5:48:23 PM PDT by Come get it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ratcat
bttt
86 posted on 09/24/2001 5:24:20 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Come get it
bump to the top please !!
87 posted on 09/24/2001 5:24:42 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
In the current investigation, especially following the money, I wonder if both Clinton's won't be found to have taken much money from Arafat and who knows who else in the vicinity?

Yes, follow the money!

88 posted on 09/24/2001 5:32:12 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
bttt
89 posted on 09/25/2001 5:56:31 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Lockbox
Off the top of my head, I think it was a 747-200.
90 posted on 09/25/2001 6:32:05 PM PDT by conservative cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
Didn't Rush Limbaugh dismiss the theory that 800 was a terrorist hit, or brought down by a bomb, because Kallstrom was his friend, he trusted Kallstrom, and Kallstrom assured us it wasn't a bomb or a missile? Is it time to pressure Rush to show some credibility and ask some questions?

Rush is not an independent thinker. He is given a script to follow by the RNC and he follows it. Nobody wanted the truth to come out about TWA 800 -- it would have caused panic and we would have had to actually do something. Believe me, if the WTC hadn't been hit and fallen on national TV, the pols would have been trying to cover it up too. Now the cats out of the bag and we're still being lied to. This thing is a heck of a lot bigger than just bin Laden and his followers. I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out that there just may already be not only chemical and bio weapons, but maybe even a nuke or two within our borders. Can you understand why the government has been trying to cover this all up?

Richard W.

91 posted on 09/25/2001 6:53:28 PM PDT by arete (richard@mail.fwi.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras
Sen. John Kerry repeated this on Larry King last night. He was talking about terrorism, and in a matter-of-fact statement, he listed the "bombing" of TWA 800 as a terrorist attack on the US.
92 posted on 09/25/2001 7:05:01 PM PDT by ballina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Judge Parker, LSJohn, backhoe
FYI
93 posted on 09/25/2001 8:34:51 PM PDT by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax
As a number of sober military FR minds quietly stated during the TWA800 debacle, if it was indeed shot down, it was shot down for grave cause. Thanks to 9/11, idea is no longer in the TFH realm. We'll probably never know the details. But if this is the case, the Clintons can rot in hell knowing that their politically motivated coverup contributed to the deaths of almost 7000 people on 9/11/01.
94 posted on 09/26/2001 7:03:02 AM PDT by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
As a number of sober military FR minds quietly stated during the TWA800 debacle, if it was indeed shot down, it was shot down for grave cause. Thanks to 9/11, idea is no longer in the TFH realm. We'll probably never know the details. But if this is the case, the Clintons can rot in hell knowing that their politically motivated coverup contributed to the deaths of almost 7000 people on 9/11/01. 94 Posted on 09/26/2001 07:03:01 PDT by Harrison Bergeron

AMEN! you got that right!

95 posted on 09/26/2001 11:45:44 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

BUMP
96 posted on 11/12/2001 7:21:26 AM PST by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker; *TWA800_list
Index-
97 posted on 12/09/2001 6:23:49 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson