Posted on 09/18/2001 2:07:47 PM PDT by newzjunkey
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:19 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
WASHINGTON -- The FBI is investigating the possibility that suicide hijackers were on board a fifth transcontinental airline flight last Tuesday, one that was cancelled just minutes before its scheduled 8:10 a.m. departure from Boston due to a mechanical problem, according to sources familiar with the investigation.
Federal agents are searching for an undetermined number of passengers who were on board American Airlines Flight 43, according to one source familiar with the passenger manifest. The flight was to have departed Boston 25 minutes after American Flight 11, which struck New York's World Trade Center, this source said.
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...
My dear brother and sister FReepers,
At this, of all times in my lifetime, I would like nothing more than to be able to read these threads and reply to them. I have much I would like to say.
BUT, I cannot!
Why?
Because I am trying hard to raise the finances needed to keep FreeRepublic up and running so that we can continue to share valuable information and respond to it.
I beg you, if you have not yet donated to FreeRepublic this quarter, do so now!
I realize you are giving to lots of Relief efforts and I encourage you to do so. But we need to help FR too. Where would we be right now without it?
If you have no money, please come and bump the Fundraiser Thread.
I would really like to reach our goal quickly so that I and the rest of the dedicated FReepers who are working the Fundraiser Threads can participate in what is undeniably the most important time in FreeRepublic's history.
WHERE WOULD YOU GET YOUR NEWS FROM IF FREEREPUBLIC WASN'T HERE? <--click here
Support FreeRepublic! Support the U.S.A. <--click here
Understood and agreed. I thought exactly the same things last Tuesday. The death toll could have been vastly higher if the aircraft had hit lower on the tower and at the same time. Let's just be glad (if possible) that they didn't. A tatical error, perhaps, but their overall goal was accomplished. For me, a botched job implies that goals were not accomplished and the job was a failure as a result. They got what they wanted; many deaths, disruption of daily life, etc. And may those who were behind it be revisted with the same to the nth power.
The same can be said of the Pentagon. Yes, more deaths would have been the result of a different impact point. Gladly, that didn't happen. But the very symbology of successful crashing an aircraft into the symbol of American military might AND killing people leads me to say that, no, it was not a botched job either.
The bombing of the WTC was also a botched job because the truck bomb also included canisters of cyanide that were supposed to vent into the buildings. The only problem was that the explosion burned off all the cyanide in the process.
There's an military airshow coming up in a few weeks, my brother and I are debating whether we're going to go. I was surprised it hasn't been cancelled.
Also to consider, there are a number of airports that 'close' at night and don't fly before 6 or 7AM. I'm familiar with at least two in major west coast cities. Further, it seems obvious to me the terrorists aren't going to plan to attack empty buildings.
It's anyone's guess what's coming or what else was planned. I doubt, even with a full investigation, and the apprehension of everyone involved, that we'll ever know the full, not fully realized, horror of the planned assault.
I deliberately overstated the estimated number of people involved slightly, to account for all of the people in the adjacent buildings (including the 47-story building that later collapsed). I think 50,000-60,000 potential victims is probably fairly close.
East coast airports were needed because they were hitting east coast targets and wanted full fuel tanks. DC was missed altogether and WTC was botched.I'm almost certain that west coast targets were planned, too. Those would have required west coast planes bound for east coast destinations. The whole system was shut down before the west coast airports were really up and running.
Also, it seems that the "pilots" weren't very proficient. They would have needed daylight unless they were very good with instrument flight.
By the time it was daylight on the west coast, the system was shutting down.
That was the intent of the first attack. The guy that was finally apprehended overseas told one of the captors that if he had had a little more time and money that he would have succeeded. (I heard that on the History Channel last night)
Main Entry: Botch
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: Middle English bocchen
Date: 1530
1 : to foul up hopelessly -- often used with up
2 : to put together in a makeshift way
- botch·er noun
WTC: First plane was too high, Second plane was 18 minutes late, not level or centered. The goal was surely 20,000+.The first plane into the WTC came over Manhattan. It couldn't have hit the WTC much lower without being in danger of hitting other buildings first.
I think the delay was planned so that live TV news cameras would se it. If that was the plan, it worked perfectly.
As for where it hit, the resulting fires weakened columns on two sides of each building. It's more likely for that to occur where they hit than it would be if they had centered the hits. Going through the center means the plane would have had to penetrate the core to get to the other side. By hitting to the side and cutting diagonally across a corner, they were sure to damage two sides of the outer skin. The outer skin was the main load bearing steel on those towers.
WTC was intended to be a delayed one-two punch, a common terrorist technique to ensnare the rescue workers. No, their failure was down in DC. I can't believe the Pentagon was more of a symbolic prize than the Capitol would have been. My guess is that the 3rd, 4th, and 5th targets were in DC: Pentagon, Capitol, & White House. WH was too hard to pick up coming in from the west, perhaps the 1st circle on the Capitol was too difficult(rumor was flight school said one of these guys was a crummy pilot), so they went for the Pent., with the expectation of follow up attacks. The only thing I don't get was why they did this attack when Bush was out of town. With all the inside info they had, surely they knew he wasn't at the WH. But the idea that one of these hijacked planes would take out AF1 makes absolutely no sense.
So all I can guess is that they may have wanted him out of the WH, so as not to be in the bunker. Of course if the WH was the 1st target, that point would be mute. But my guess is that there was a ground plan for Bush, perhaps a SAM(but high risk of failure) or suitcase nuke somewhere near his return to DC. but the delayed return allowed for a tightening of security that closed that window. But this theory seems unlikely, too.
So if one hit one tower, another hit the other tower, the third hit the Petagon, and the fourth one crashed in PA (headed for the White House(?)) then the fifth one may have been headed for the Statue of Liberty - No?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.