1 posted on
09/16/2001 12:42:29 PM PDT by
AJFavish
(ajfavish@att.net)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: AJFavish
It would appear some believe that
our government may lie to "we the people".
Surely, that can't be possible!
2 posted on
09/16/2001 1:03:20 PM PDT by
G.Mason
To: AJFavish
I'm more convinced than ever that the TWA 800 was an Iraqi stinger missile type operation that was covered up. I believe it was covered up so as to not allow the terrorists to use it for propaganda purposes and also to not panic the American people.
To: AJFavish
Maybe TWA 800 was the reason the Air Force One threat was taken seriously. Bush can't just come out and say Clinton is a pig without threatening national security.
8 posted on
09/16/2001 1:50:49 PM PDT by
marbren
To: AJFavish
I believe it was Wednesday, but when Clinton was allowed back in this country, he went to NYC and ran into a FoxNews reporter. I wish I'd had my VCR taping it, the reporter asked Clinton if he didn't feel somewhat responsible. Of course all he did was dance around the question, but I gotta admire the reporter.(though the question of reponsibility comes 8 years too late)
9 posted on
09/16/2001 1:59:56 PM PDT by
orlop9
To: AJFavish
I just read an article from a London paper (1999)on another thread, which claims that Bin Laden had a cell in Albania that was playing a part in Kosovo. This would mean that Clinton was fighting on the same side as Bin Laden in Kosovo.
10 posted on
09/16/2001 2:05:23 PM PDT by
Eva
To: AJFavish
The Clinton Administration actually bombed Iraq for nothing more than evidence of a plot to assassinate ex-prez Bush, so there is no reason to suppose that Clinton covered up for other Iraqi guilt. The investigation of the 1993 WTC bombing uncovered a primarily Egyptian conspiracy and several of the guilty parties are now rotting in prison. THe suggestion that Iraq had something to do with the Murrah Building bombing is such obvious hokum that it is pretty obvious that the author of this essay has a heavy axe to grind. The Taliban were heavily subsidized by the Reagan and Bush administrations, and if the Clinton Administration failed to take aggressive steps against it, it was not for lack of trying - when Clinton ordered various Bin Laden assets bombed, the Republicans started whining that he had bombed a poor innocent aspirin factory.
14 posted on
09/16/2001 8:13:05 PM PDT by
DonQ
To: AJFavish
This certainly makes sense. My God.
19 posted on
09/25/2001 1:35:36 PM PDT by
Osinski
To: AJFavish; *TWA800_list; *clintonscandals
Index-
21 posted on
12/09/2001 6:25:40 AM PST by
backhoe
To: AJFavish
TWA flt. 800 WAS shot down. The only real question is by who??
To: AJFavish
and [the] OKC Bombing
Are you saying that the experienced invesigators hired by McVeigh's original lawyer, Oklahoma Jones, were incompetant?
And you THINK a bunch of geeks and social misfits on the internet are going to find the truth?
I don't THINK so ...
What about Tim McVeigh's claim he did it himself-
- and the corroborating testimony of Michael Fortier-
- and the TONS of evidence (including witnesses, phone records and sales reciepts for materials)?
Was McVeigh drugged and hypnotized during those interviews (that were the basis for the book)?
You know, he laughed at you conspiracy types who blow this up as you do into some HUGE gov't cover-up!
26 posted on
12/09/2001 7:01:16 AM PST by
_Jim
To: AJFavish
Something I'd really like to know from the 'conspiracy pinheads' - - do ANY of these conspiracy-minded books and videos or web sites EVER cover the model series, the history, the age, the accumulated flight hours or the total number of takeoff/landing cycles on that 747 that was TWA800?
I thought not ...
27 posted on
12/09/2001 7:07:16 AM PST by
_Jim
To: AJFavish
"Did Clinton Cover-up Iraqi Involvement in 1993 WTC Bombing and TWA 800 and OKC Bombing "...........now, that must be the most rhetorical question ever asked.
Of course, that is exactly what this former researcher for the U.S. State Department documents in her work. But, many others, who remain employed with the federal government, were involved. Mr. Bush, for this government to operate effectively, empty liberal heads need to roll.
To: AJFavish
Yes. And then blamed it on innocent patriotic Americans such as "Lee Harvey McVeigh" and his totally innocent army buddy from Kansas.
38 posted on
12/09/2001 8:08:44 AM PST by
crystalk
To: AJFavish
bump
47 posted on
12/09/2001 8:29:24 AM PST by
GOPJ
To: AJFavish
Seems to me that the only things he didn't cover up were his lust and his arrogance....oh yea, and his wife!
To: AJFavish
The general rules on this subject is:
1. If Clinton thought any subject would damage his poll ratings he covered it up.
2. If Clinton was not sure if a particular subject would hurt is poll ratings he would cover it up.
If given a choice to tell the truth or lie about a particular subject Clinton would choose to lie. He really was and is pathalogical.
52 posted on
12/09/2001 8:53:49 AM PST by
eFudd
To: ChaseR; Howlin; Alamo-Girl
fyi
To: Nancie Drew; BlueDogDemo; Secret Squid; roughrider; golitely; honway; Fred Mertz; Plummz
FYI
To: AJFavish
bump
55 posted on
12/09/2001 9:48:13 AM PST by
GOPJ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson