Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Hides Clinton Fund-raising Scandal From Congress {Why Would Bush Cover Up for Clinton?}
newsmax.com ^ | Friday, Sept. 7, 2001 | NewsMax.com Wires

Posted on 09/07/2001 4:00:51 PM PDT by freedomnews

White House Hides Clinton Fund-raising Scandal From Congress Friday, Sept. 7, 2001

WASHINGTON - The House Government Reform Committee on Thursday prepared to subpoena the Bush administration for documents relating to Justice Department investigations of the Clinton administration's fund-raising scandal. But the White House said it was prepared to invoke executive privilege to keep the documents secret, shocking congressional investigators.

Subpoenas were also planned for another set of documents related to Boston-area organized crime.

Two sets of documents involve the Justice Department's decision not to seek an independent counsel after the 1996 campaign fund-raising scandals that hit both parties during the Clinton administration.

The other 13 documents relate to Justice Department records involving a series of investigations into organized crime in New England, which resulted in key government informants being indicted for a slew of crimes in 1995. The committee has been investigating the use of informants in investigations of organized crime.

Led by Committee Chairman Dan Burton, R-Ind., investigators sought a deal with the Bush administration over the release of the documents. The White House said the decision would be in the "best interests of the administration of justice."

The "president has accepted the recommendation of White House counsel Alberto Gonzalez and is prepared to invoke executive privilege over these documents," an administration official said.

He said that though the documents had no bearing on actions of the Bush administration, White House lawyers had determined that "it was in the best interests of the administration of justice that prosecutors be able to think about options in a case without making those considerations public."

Why Would Bush Cover Up for Clinton?

The decision to seek executive privilege for the documents of another administration's scandals shocked investigators, a committee source said.

"We were somewhat surprised to see the White House exert executive privilege," the committee source said. "The documents we requested do not go directly to private conversations between past presidents and attorneys general. We even specifically said we didn't want documents related to open investigations.

"We've been negotiating with them for months, and at no time did they even mention that they would claim any privilege."

The committee sources said the subpoenas did not request grand jury information or documents related to open or continuing investigations, which they said should have made the president more responsive to the request.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 09/07/2001 4:00:51 PM PDT by freedomnews
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedomnews
I hope the President has a very good reason for not turning over the documents. Something like this just make Republicans look bad.
2 posted on 09/07/2001 4:06:19 PM PDT by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomnews
Why would Bush cover up for Clinton? Easy, how many FBI files did the 'toons have?
3 posted on 09/07/2001 4:06:21 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomnews
I don't think its a question of cover-up but rather one related to something Pres. Bush stated over and over again during the campaign: It is time to move on. I am in no way justifing his administrations decision but offering a possible explanation.
4 posted on 09/07/2001 4:08:04 PM PDT by HOYA97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomnews
Just thinking with my fingers.
Does x42 have something on x41?
And now 43 has the equalizer on x42.
5 posted on 09/07/2001 4:09:04 PM PDT by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HOYA97
Also, W does not want to set a precedent where the Rats will start demanding documents for every prosecutorial decision that W's AG makes. As to these subjects, I think the facts should be aired via indictments and public trials. Oh, to dream....
6 posted on 09/07/2001 4:09:41 PM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
I agree with you. Dubya wants to protect his right to executive privelege. He wants his advisors to be able to send whatever advice they think is best while not worrying that one day their memos might become public. I do not blame him.
7 posted on 09/07/2001 4:12:27 PM PDT by DallasSun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw
Stop and think how far they could take that little scenario! Hillary would have to win next, and get soemthing on Jr. Then, maybe, Jeb to counter her, then chelsea to counter him...OMG! Noooooo.
8 posted on 09/07/2001 4:14:10 PM PDT by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HOYA97
It may be to move on, but the Justice Dept has begun a high level investigation into Mr. and Mrs. Clinton. It is really cranking up right now. It has been kept under wraps, which is why the media hasn't talked about it. Perhaps Bush realizes correctly that Congress is asking for the documents to look tough on Clinton Corruption but won't really do anything. Only a Justice Dept investigation will have teeth to bite the Clintons.
9 posted on 09/07/2001 4:14:24 PM PDT by Sir Clancelot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
You're correct, eureka. Bad precedent. GW is standing on principle here. Has to do with one branch of government meddling with another. Isn't the White House standing firm against releasing the info the Dems want about Bush's energy meetings? I can see where he's coming from (although it still burns my bippy!).

Leni

10 posted on 09/07/2001 4:14:29 PM PDT by MinuteGal (KeepYourPowderDry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DallasSun
Limiting Congress is not a bad start. Who remains the WHITE hat?.Go Roy Gene Bush!
11 posted on 09/07/2001 4:19:58 PM PDT by larryjohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DallasSun
Did you blame clintoon?
12 posted on 09/07/2001 4:21:27 PM PDT by Patrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedomnews
Can anybody say 'Mena'?

Didnt think so. All I hear is Bahhhh, Baaahhhhhhhh! People, taking it like a sheep.

13 posted on 09/07/2001 4:24:17 PM PDT by dead culture watch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HOYA97
I just want justice for laws that were broken and why would Bush and Ashcroft want to protect Clinton from prosecution? Does he control them through blackmail with the FBI files?
14 posted on 09/07/2001 4:24:38 PM PDT by freedomnews
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freedomnews
It's only about espionage and treason. Let's move on.
15 posted on 09/07/2001 4:27:02 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomnews
Oh, the hypocrisy... when Clinton does it, it's evil...when Bush does it, it's good..... puh-leeeese........
16 posted on 09/07/2001 4:28:42 PM PDT by Lexington Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HOYA97
There is no such thing as president executive privileges. According to the Supreme Court,

on Nixon vs the U.S., in reference to the recordings of Water Gate, that was their ruling.

17 posted on 09/07/2001 4:31:07 PM PDT by freedomnews
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: teletech
I hope the President has a very good reason for not turning over the documents. Something like this just make Republicans look bad.

There are some things that transend politics. Every president from Thomas Jefferson to Bush has tried to preserve the independence of the executive branch. Presidents believe that congress has no right to their papers or conversations, any more than a president has the rights to congressional conversations or papers. Let congress try to demand communication records from the supreme court if you want to hear a "GO TO HELL" from people in black robes. They would refuse to.

The bigest problem a president has is that he is always surrounded by yes men and woman. Nearly everyone tries to figure out what he wants to hear, then tells him what they think he wants to hear.

Presidents try hard to get people to tell them things they should hear. Often people are told to present views they do not support or believe in. If such presentations ever became public, they would end. Presidents would make a lot more bad decisions than they do.

People will not present all positions on a problem to a president if their is even a slight chance their presentation will be made public.

Thus ever since Thomas Jefferson every president has resisted telling congress about previous presidents deliberations or advice received. For he knows that if he does, the first successor from the other party will pay him back.

Congress has full access to everything a president does. Congress should not have access to what presidential advisors say to the president or to each other. Congress has access to every Supreme court decision. They do not and should not have access to what the justices say to their aids or what the aids say to each other.

Our nation was founded on the principle that anyone can say anything in private. If that does not apply to presidents, it will soon not apply to you.

18 posted on 09/07/2001 4:31:30 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
Why would Bush cover up for Clinton?

Professional courtesy.

19 posted on 09/07/2001 4:34:03 PM PDT by rightofrush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HOYA97
I am in no way justifing his administrations decision but offering a possible explanation...that will only fly with die-hard bushies.
20 posted on 09/07/2001 4:36:29 PM PDT by rightofrush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson