Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another step toward 5th Gen air power for the Luftwaffe.
Lockheed ^ | 07/17/2026 | Lockheed

Posted on 08/27/2026 8:35:26 AM PDT by Red6

After completing final assembly, the aircraft recently made its way to Aircraft Final Finishes, where it will receive its paint and finishes, including the stealth coating that helps reduce its radar signature.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Germany; US: Texas; War
KEYWORDS: f35; fighter; jsf; military

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

Iran has been working on their IADS for years, tailoring it specifically for us, throwing large sums of money at it, and getting some help by both China and Russia.

The F35 has performed awesome.

Even the one that did get hit, made it back: https://www.airandspaceforces.com/usaf-pilot-shrapnel-wounds-f-35-hit-iran/

He does a good job dispelling some of negative news of the past, at minute 20 he begins explaining why the F35 can take damage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_1LyUAOI4Q

The US is in many enabling technologies in pole position (specifically for military aircraft), albeit China is trying their best to narrow that advantage: stealth, radar, avionics, AI and computing, ECM and sensors, likely even power-plants for jets like this (P&W and GE).

The F35 is IMHO an ugly jet. It's not even memorably ugly like a Warthog. It looks like the short fat kid that wants to play basketball. However, what it lacks in "form" it seems to more than make up with in "function," and it's the latter which matters.

I think the German Luftwaffe is getting a capable platform.

1 posted on 08/27/2026 8:35:26 AM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red6

I like that - the fat kid who hits nothing but net from anywhere on the court ;-)

Now, in fairness, contrast the F-35 with this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_F-47#/media/File:F-47-artist-rendition_(cropped).jpg


2 posted on 08/27/2026 8:41:18 AM PDT by Blueflag (To not carry is to choose to be defenseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6

As the son of a WWII vet who was attacked by Luftwaffe aircraft, I won’t ever get over the kick of parachuting out of Luftwaffe aircraft.


3 posted on 08/27/2026 8:45:05 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6

Good. Now that Germany is building up their capabilities, perhaps we can draw down the U.S. presence in the European theatre.


4 posted on 08/27/2026 8:50:21 AM PDT by voicereason (When a bartender can join Congress and become a millionaire...there’s a problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6

I thought there was a pan-European effort to develop their own 5th gen stealth jet. Maybe the F-35 is a stop gap until it’s ready.


5 posted on 08/27/2026 8:54:17 AM PDT by Decombobulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag; Red6
The Mover and Gonky Show is hosted by a couple of former fighter pilots.

Mover calls the F-35 "Fat Amy."

6 posted on 08/27/2026 8:59:49 AM PDT by real saxophonist (Hoplophobia will never be in the DSM, because the DSM is written by hoplophobes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red6

I hope the Luftwaffe will get a more competent Reich Marshal this time.


7 posted on 08/27/2026 9:00:47 AM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6
“Ve vill learn to fly ze vay ve do everything in ze the German Army- By ze book!’’ Gert Frobe, “Those Magnificent Men In Their Flying Machines’’.
8 posted on 08/27/2026 9:15:40 AM PDT by jmacusa ( Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist

LOL. funny cuz it’s true.


9 posted on 08/27/2026 9:17:34 AM PDT by Blueflag (To not carry is to choose to be defenseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red6
China is trying their best to narrow that advantage: stealth, radar, avionics, AI and computing, ECM and sensors, likely even power-plants for jets like this (P&W and GE).

The Chinese have a much easier time getting their air force to match that of the U.S.: they copy everything the U.S. does. The U.S. is the research and development department for the Chinese.

But, even while copying our stuff, that stuff fails to perform as our original stuff.
10 posted on 08/27/2026 9:32:59 AM PDT by adorno ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adorno
And, they have pilots named Wang Wei.
11 posted on 08/27/2026 9:36:47 AM PDT by real saxophonist (Hoplophobia will never be in the DSM, because the DSM is written by hoplophobes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red6

The F-22 Raptor is even more stealthy than the F-35. No country other than the U.S. is allowed to purchase one or to get it’s hands on the F-22 tech. It’s exclusive to the U.S.


12 posted on 08/27/2026 9:43:12 AM PDT by adorno ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6

Yes, but is that Fokker a Messerschmidt we all want to know.

I could not help myself.


13 posted on 08/27/2026 10:17:14 AM PDT by srmanuel ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adorno

It also denies them the knowledge of how to build things. Chinese developers and engineers will not test anything for fear it might fail. When the pilots get these planes, they are the beta testers.


14 posted on 08/27/2026 10:25:59 AM PDT by AppyPappy (They don't call you a Nazi because they think you are one. They do it to justify violence. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Sorta like the early adopters of the latest and greatest MS Windows product...


15 posted on 08/27/2026 11:54:54 AM PDT by null and void (Mongo just prawn in buffet of life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red6

"We are so back!"

16 posted on 08/27/2026 11:57:21 AM PDT by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Yes but Goering was a pretty fair WWI pilot!


17 posted on 08/27/2026 12:20:07 PM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

He had two but they were small.


18 posted on 08/27/2026 12:21:51 PM PDT by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Different times.

He and Hitler were two of the biggest reasons why Germany lost as quickly as they did.

Goering: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_G%C3%B6ring

He didn't think strategically.

It would be like making a smart SSG (E-6) who is an excellent squad leader, the corps commander in a major theater war.

That was a HUGE benefit to us.

Germany fought WWII without true strategic bombers or logistical airlift, with horrible consequences.

This was their mainstay bomber: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinkel_He_111 (no payload, no altitude, no range)

This was their primary transport: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkers_Ju_52 (not bad)

But our C47 had 2.6 times the range, could carry 1.6 times the payload, and we built 2.5 times as many: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_C-47_Skytrain

Why does this matter. There were several cases in WWII where we kept encircled forces on the ground going, or cut off by the sea, supplying them from the air. Think of how much more damage the German 6th Army could have done had they just gotten some food, medical supplies, ammo? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Stalingrad Even if they had ultimately lost, had they gotten food, ammo and medical supplies, maybe even some fuel, they could have fought on and done (((FAR))) more damage.

Think of the Battle of Britain: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Britain If they had sufficient numbers of a true “strategic bomber,” things would have been far worse.

Goering was not a great military strategist.

He was probably a patriot, fearless WWI ace, and even pretty smart. But his lack of experience in planning in a “big picture” sort of way was to Germany's detriment.

Germany went into a long strategic war, where being able to strike deep, carry a lot, fly high, was important. But they were equipped with with smaller, lighter payload, lower flying, shorter ranges. Large parts of the UK were not even in range for the Germans!: https://www.ww2-weapons.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/map-battle-of-britain-px800.jpg

Had they caught this in 1939, in the beginning, maybe they could have recovered, but even as the Battle for Britain was unfolding, it was too late.

19 posted on 08/27/2026 12:47:32 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Or the Covid vaccines


20 posted on 08/27/2026 2:41:39 PM PDT by AppyPappy (They don't call you a Nazi because they think you are one. They do it to justify violence. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson