The judge’s argument rests on the stupid invalid notion that the “burden” of the law is too much because evidence says illegal voting is so rare.
Since when does the infrequency of an act make it unconstitutional to legislate a means to prevent it.
Would she make the same claim about legal means to thwart rape, burglary or murder if statistics said they very rarely happen.
The legislature got together and passed legislation.
And the judge says “You can’t. I think it’s dumb. I think it’s a burden. That’s how I feel.”
That’s not a system of government. That’s a woman stomping her feet.