Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 03/19/2026 8:49:07 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan
The Israeli killing of Ali Larijani marks another blow to the Islamic Republic’s capacity for coordination, weakening an already fragmented system and raising the risk of miscalculation under pressure.
Iran confirmed on Tuesday that Larijani—Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council and one of the regime’s central security coordinators— was killed in a morning strike on Tehran.
The strike inevitably recalls the killing of Qassem Soleimani in 2020: another precise removal of a figure who linked diplomacy, intelligence and military power.
Soleimani’s death did more than eliminate a commander. It weakened the regime’s ability to calibrate risk. Radical in purpose, cautious in execution, he pushed proxies forward without inviting existential retaliation.
His absence left a gap no successor fully filled. Coordination frayed, misjudgments mounted and responses grew less predictable. The network endured, but its timing became erratic and its restraint thinner.
Larijani’s role must be understood against that backdrop.
According to a source cited by Christiane Amanpour, Larijani had, as recently as September 2025, been viewed in some Western and Israeli assessments as a potentially acceptable transitional figure before becoming a target by early February 2026.
The account attributes the shift to his role in pressing for domestic crackdowns, adopting a more confrontational posture toward the United States and Israel and assuming a central role in shaping IRGC military operations.
The claims remain unverified but highlight how Larijani straddled internal consolidation and external escalation at a moment of acute pressure.
His career began during the Iran-Iraq War, where he rose within the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to brigadier general, later serving as Speaker of Parliament (2008–2020), where he advanced a hard-line agenda aligned with the consolidation of power in the Office of the Supreme Leader.
In the years that followed, he moved from battlefield to bureaucracy, helping consolidate the regime’s coercive and ideological infrastructure.
As head of Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (1994–2004), Larijani oversaw more than a media organization. The state broadcaster worked closely with the intelligence services and the IRGC, shaping narratives that reinforced loyalty and narrowed the space for dissent.
The 1996 Hoviyyat (Identity) series publicly branded intellectuals and professionals as traitors, airing coerced confessions and drawing sharp limits around permissible thought. At the same time, official memory of the Iran-Iraq War was recast into doctrine: martyrdom elevated, endurance framed as victory.
Over time, this messaging helped consolidate a narrower but more disciplined base embedded across Basij and IRGC networks. Its purpose was not persuasion but enforcement: to secure the regime against a broader, often unwilling society.
That framework endured. It underpinned repression during the 2009 Green Movement, resurfaced during the Woman, Life, Freedom protests in 2022 and shaped the violence of January 2026.
Beyond Iran, the same logic informed Hezbollah’s campaign in Syria, Hamas operations culminating in October 7 and the IRGC’s maritime doctrine of asymmetric pressure.
Despite tensions within the political elite, Larijani remained firmly inside the core leadership. Loyal and disciplined, he embodied continuity across institutions.
Following the death of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in the February 28 strike that opened the current phase of war, Larijani’s experience and connections positioned him as a potential stabilizing figure.
His 2025 reappointment as Iran’s security chief reinforced that role. From there he coordinated nuclear policy, crisis management and relations among the regime’s core institutions.
Larijani’s removal would introduce immediate disruption: friction in command and pressure for retaliation. The deeper consequence may be fragmentation.
The Islamic Republic now operates less as a unified state than as a dispersed system under sustained pressure from Israel and the United States. Authority increasingly runs through provincial clerical networks, IRGC commanders and Basij structures. Resources are mobilized locally, repression enforced locally and survival managed locally.
Larijani belonged to the shrinking circle still capable of linking these fragments to a central command. His loss risks accelerating the incoherence the system is already struggling to contain.
Soleimani’s precedent is instructive: decapitation weakens coordination and invites miscalculation, even as the structure endures.
Missile infrastructure remains dispersed across hardened and subterranean sites. Fast naval craft and unmanned vessels continue to threaten shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Proxy militias operate through channels designed to outlast leadership losses.
What appears as resilience may instead reflect dispersal without coordination — a system that survives but no longer acts as one.
Larijani’s killing tests not only the state’s durability but its capacity to function as a coherent force under sustained pressure. The war may not bring immediate collapse. But without figures such as Soleimani and Larijani, adaptation may hasten, rather than forestall, its demise.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
They should just ask Grok! Oh wait, they cut off the internet.
Decapitation truly weakens the regime but does not topple it. However doxing as many of the goons as possible will sow fear, uncertainty and desertion among them. They once they see their names on a internet list will know that they will be subject very soon to the people’s justice.
The problem with killing these bastard is that there are lots of other bastards eager to take their place.
So when they run out of “supremes”, do we get “regular”?
I don’t know if ‘eager’ is the correct word here, unless they really have hankering for the 72 virgins...
Trump was discussing talking and ending this. This would be the guy we would be talking to. So the wall kissers killed him two days later. Clearly trying to interfere with Trump finding a way out of this war.
Likud extremists are doing all they can from stopping any negotiations.
The problem with killing these bastard is that there are lots of other bastards eager to take their place.
Pretty common in totalitarian states. When Mohammed died, Islam split into fighting factions.
Trump was discussing talking and ending this. This would be the guy we would be talking to. So the wall kissers killed him two days later. Clearly trying to interfere with Trump finding a way out of this war.
Likud extremists are doing all they can from stopping any negotiations.
Trump has been attempting negotiations since the start. No one in Iran has been willing to meet the conditions. Trying to blame Israel for success in the Iranian war, which the Iranians have been waging against us for 47 years, does not pass the smell test.
To the Iranian Theocracy, the USA is the “Great Satan” and Israel is the “little Satan”.
I’m so surprised you found some imaginary way to say this victory is a bad act by “wall kissers” as you call Israelis.
Jewish people could cure cancer and you’d lie saying they had it all along and kept it secret for fun and profit.
When you have a bunch of fanatics who volunteer to strap bombs on their bodies, or blow themselves up in car bombs, who want to be martyrs, I’m sure there will be a few eager ones to want to take their place.
Nothing he ever says passes the smell test.
Everything is viewed as an act of The Jooos.
Kill the people with the authority and the will to surrender.
That’s the plan. Except it’s not OUR plan.
>> So the wall kissers killed him two days later.
Wall kissers, huh?
I follow CHRIST. I prayed at the Wall. It was a profound spiritual experience. Actually, pretty much ALL of Israel that I visited was a profound experience. Didn’t go to Tel Aviv.
Them joooos is an awesome bunch of GOD-fearing people! Smart too. And courageous. I love them.
He had the “will to surrender”? I see there is speculation in that regard. Any proof?
“ He had the “will to surrender”? I see there is speculation in that regard. Any proof?”
No, no proof. The only thing that’s proven is that we can’t find out now.
[The problem with killing these bastard is that there are lots of other bastards eager to take their place.]
Yes, everybody wants to be captain of a ship that just took 3 torpedoes to starboard.
The wall is just some old rocks.
The Temple was taken down, to the last stone - and was rebuilt, permanently, in three days just as He said.
That’s what Christians have always believed.
So?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.