Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Solution to Chuck Schumer
MSN.com ^ | 11/14/2025 | Ross Barkan

Posted on 11/15/2025 1:46:19 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

For Chuck Schumer’s growing list of haters, there are two realities that are going to both excite and frustrate: He’s not going anywhere as Senate Democratic Leader, and it’s increasingly unlikely he’ll be reelected in 2028.

Schumer is now the most unpopular Senate leader with his own party on record. The Democratic base is furious at him for effectively permitting eight Democrats to vote with Republicans to end the government shutdown. For many Democratic voters, the shutdown was a great letdown because it did not secure Schumer’s stated objective: to renew expiring federal subsidies for Obamacare. It’s hard, in fact, to see what Democrats actually won for all their trouble.

Schumer is seen by many progressives and even restive moderates as a political leader who is out of touch with the current mood. He has not offered many compelling anti-Trump arguments or a vision for the Democratic Party going forward. He is not the fighter they crave. His communication style is pulled from the 20th century and is, to a growing share of Democrats, too milquetoast. Hakeem Jeffries, the House minority leader, is resented less, but he is not wildly popular, either. Democratic voters, at the moment, seem to be nursing nostalgia for Nancy Pelosi, who announced recently she was not seeking reelection. Her dynamism would be hard for anyone to match.

If many of these Democratic voters hope, come later this year or next, either man is replaced as leader, they are going to be disappointed. Neither have any serious rivals in their caucuses, and the actual Democratic members of Congress will, on the balance, always seek to avoid bloody leadership fights. As long as Schumer wants to be leader, he will remain so. What could change the calculus is if Democrats pull...

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2025 1:46:19 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Democratic voters, at the moment, seem to be nursing nostalgia for Nancy Pelosi... Her dynamism would be hard for anyone to match.


2 posted on 11/15/2025 1:49:22 PM PST by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Schumer needed to end the shutdown. So, he found eight Democrats to vote for it who were either not running again or probably wouldn’t be hurt by the vote. He probably told them, “Look we must do this. The shutdown has backfired. Plus, I’m going to say some bad things about you. But you can have (some trade item) and I’ll owe you a favor in the future.”


3 posted on 11/15/2025 1:54:26 PM PST by Gen.Blather (Has anyone seen my tagline? ...I know it was here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

For all my disgust, I don’t hate Schumer. But I wouldn’t shed any tears if a heart attack or a massive stroke were to relocate him to “the Other Side”.


4 posted on 11/15/2025 2:17:06 PM PST by AFB-XYZ (( We have two options: 1. Stand up, or 2. Bend over))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“The Democratic base is furious at him for effectively permitting eight Democrats to vote with Republicans...”


I understand the power that a Senate leader can wield, but if Senators can only vote the way their party leader permits them, what’s the point of having them (votes or Senators)?


5 posted on 11/15/2025 2:27:03 PM PST by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

/eyeroll


6 posted on 11/15/2025 2:28:38 PM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu
I understand the power that a Senate leader can wield, but if Senators can only vote the way their party leader permits them, what’s the point of having them (votes or Senators)?

Watch "House of Cards" with Kevin Spacey.

7 posted on 11/15/2025 2:32:58 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (I have no answers. Only questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu

Kabuki can be very entertaining....

[And has a long history]


8 posted on 11/15/2025 2:41:59 PM PST by Paladin2 (YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu
Pre-17th amendment, the Senators voted the way their states wanted.

-PJ

9 posted on 11/15/2025 2:58:12 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Kabuki can be very entertaining...


I actually got to watch an entire Kabuki play featuring giant rats and the star descending from the top of the back of the theater to the stage. The stage hands are all dressed in black and the audience is supposed to pretend they can’t be seen.

Wonder who the stage hands are in the Senate?


10 posted on 11/15/2025 3:20:39 PM PST by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Final solution?


11 posted on 11/15/2025 3:21:03 PM PST by Texas Eagle ("Throw me to the wolves and I'll return leading the pack"- Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Pre-17th amendment...


Yes, the 17th completely changed the relationship between the state government and the Federal government. A huge mistake in my opinion. Don’t know if we’d have better Senators or worse though.


12 posted on 11/15/2025 3:22:35 PM PST by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
For Chuck Schumer’s growing list of haters, there are two realities that are going to both excite and frustrate: He’s not going anywhere as Senate Democratic Leader, and it’s increasingly unlikely he’ll be reelected in 2028.

What crap reporting.

He's not going to live forever, so yes, he will be going *somewhere*, and if he's not likely to run then he will also be going somewhere because he won't be holding office any more.

13 posted on 11/15/2025 3:24:46 PM PST by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Make him eat his raw cheeseburgers, problem solved.


14 posted on 11/15/2025 3:33:13 PM PST by decal (They won't stop, so they'll have to be stopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu

“Don’t know if we’d have better Senators or worse though.”

Somehow many State legislatures are a wretched hive of scum and villainy. [Even more so than Congress]

Letting them pick Senators these days would be unlikely to improve matters. [Maybe a one and one situation...]


15 posted on 11/15/2025 4:10:39 PM PST by Paladin2 (YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Inner Party Socialists do not really like other Inner Party Socialists. Not a lot of loyalty or integrity to count on from others.


16 posted on 11/15/2025 5:03:13 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Trotskyites vs Stalinists.


17 posted on 11/15/2025 5:07:36 PM PST by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

For the life of me, I don’t understand how the Democrats ended up in a position where their leaders in both houses of Congress were from the same state — and the same CITY in that state.


18 posted on 11/15/2025 5:14:23 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Sometimes within the same group. Can’t trust anyone. They’ll turn on you to save themselves.


19 posted on 11/15/2025 5:16:54 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Stalin killed Kirov, because Kirov got too popular.


20 posted on 11/15/2025 5:20:26 PM PST by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson