Posted on 09/16/2025 7:30:03 PM PDT by nickcarraway
The death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has reignited heated debates after his controversial remarks about Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce resurfaced online. Kirk, who founded Turning Point USA, tragically passed away at age 31 on September 10, 2025, after being shot during a speaking event at Utah Valley University. However, it’s his relationship advice to the global pop icon that is now making waves across social media. Charlie Kirk’s remarks drew sharp criticism for being misogynistic
During an August 26 episode of The Charlie Kirk Show, Kirk addressed Taylor Swift’s recent engagement to Kansas City Chiefs star Travis Kelce. His statements went beyond typical political commentary, instead offering personal and judgmental advice. “She should have more children than she has houses,” Kirk declared, “That is my challenge, Taylor Swift, and I’m not being sarcastic. I think that if she ends up having children, she’ll stop this kind of liberal, endorsing Joe Biden nonsense.”
Kirk went further, calling Swift “not a good role model for young women” because she focused on her career instead of settling down earlier. His most contentious remarks urged Swift to “Reject feminism. Submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge.”
These comments were met with swift backlash. On Reddit, many users condemned Kirk’s statements as “deeply regressive and misogynistic.” One user pointedly remarked, “’Submit to your husband’ is straight up Handmaid’s Tale vibes.” Another argued, “Why can’t folks just say ‘They seem happy. I wish them well.’ and move on.”
Why the controversy matters in today’s culture
Taylor Swift, a global superstar with massive influence, especially among women, became an unintended focal point in the culture wars. Kirk’s comments highlight how some figures attempt to shape public opinion by leveraging celebrity relationships as political symbols. His words were not just about Swift’s personal life but aimed at pushing a broader conservative agenda, suggesting that personal choices could politically influence millions of fans.
As the nation processes Kirk’s shocking death, his comments continue to fuel discussion around feminism, celebrity influence, and the power dynamics in modern relationships. The controversy reminds us how public figures, especially women, often face disproportionate scrutiny over their private choices.
“ignited controversy after his death” in their dreams.
Agreed. And it’s not “his death”. It’s his murder.
His OPINION...too many weak people
He nailed it on that one.
So, he cited 2000 year old Christian dogma. And?
Oh, the humanity!
Charlie Kirk had opinions.
Hopefully none of those people who were upset at Charlie’s comment, and Taylor Swift herself will never have children.
I wonder if Charlie ever read the lyrics to Swift’s songs? She has a lot of maturing to do to become a good Mom.
And the idiots brought up The Handmaiden's Tale, because they're so shallow, they have no knowledge of 2000 years of Christianity. That's their problem. They can't see past their nose, and don't want to. I never watched the show, but my son did, and I didn't know until the final episodes that this crap took place in Canada. I had assumed it took place in the U.S.A. because of all the hullabaloo "that it could happen here." Then I find out that the good old U.S.A. comes in once more and rescues them all from the evil Canucks. Color me surprised.
The source is another left wing rag.
So he had a biblical world view, and that is controversial.
Kellie is washed, and needs to hang um up.
Big time.
Agreed.
Even older than that. All cultures have high regard for attentive mothers. Just another b.s.a.i. article.
Best wishes to Taylor and kelcie. We don’t want to hear about your interpersonal interactions. Don’t fight over your inheritances or hate or kill each other. Goodbye.
Bill Clinton certainly faced scrutiny over his private choices.
Here is some other Indian news from varying sources:
"Tensions flared in Chhattisgarh over alleged religious conversions, with major confrontations reported in both Bilaspur and Durg districts over the weekend. What began as prayer meetings by the Christian community quickly spiralled into prolonged protests, clashes, and police action."Anyone notice this bilge from Times of India was written by "Global Sports Desk?"Source: Massive Clashes In Chhattisgarh's Bilaspur, Durg Over Alleged Conversions NDTV, 15 September 2025
"They justify violent attacks against Muslims and Christians on the grounds that this is retaliation for centuries of violence perpetrated by Muslim invaders and Christian colonial rulers on Hindus."
Source: Hindutva Violence Targeting India's Christians Is Growing Diplomat, 14 August 2025
"An open call issued by Hindu leaders to kill and rape Christians in the central Indian state of Chhattisgarh on March 1 has raised serious concerns about the impunity with which Christians are being targeted in the country."
Source: Hindus Urged to Rape, Kill Christians on March 1 in Chhattisgarh International Christian Concern, 26 February 2025
"The funeral was blocked by right-wing Hindu vigilantes — backed by village authorities."
Christian pastor denied burial as attacks on religious minorities rise in India ABC, 15 February 2025
"...regressive and misogynistic," my arse. India is FILLED with regressive and misogynistic Indians. Many of whom HATE Christians.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.