Posted on 09/10/2025 6:39:23 PM PDT by TBP
2 facts about Charlie Kirk’s killer are VERY rare in the modern history of assassinations…
1) Firing ONLY one shot & it being perfect
2) Eluding capture until at least nightfall that day
I would be willing to bet that this was not this killer’s 1st rodeo, & he may be a “pro.”
Thank you for realizing I am one of the good guys, I am just simply very good at investigating these kinds of events based on what internet evidence is presented after they happen. Been analyzing videos and piecing things together for many years now.
“Still hard to believe no one saw him before hand with all those people there.”
And that was my very same thought when I saw the layout. There is no way the security on the rooftop across from him did not see him on that rooftop before the shot. Like I say, they were asleep or in on the conspiracy. They and the shooter were even all dressed the same... I am thinking the shooter might have even been one of the security detail posted.
Oh.
I just reread my post, I can see where you could have misunderstood my post.
Sorry.
“Interesting.
How do you know that ?
1st hand knowledge ?
How do you even know for sure the kill shot came from that roof ?
You seem to have a lot of inside info , maybe someone official should talk to you since you are so sure of your facts.
Maybe you can help catch the assassin.
180 posted on 09/11/2025 5:36:37 AM PDT by cuz1961”
You tried to “imply” and tie me into and associate me as an accomplice to this horrific event. Pure chickenshit back stabbing. You publicly suggested that I should also be investigated because I “know too much” about the event. With absolutely no evidence or probable cause at all for that suspicion. And it turns out you were absolutely wrong.
I don’t even know what would cause someone to even do that to another member of a community like this except pure sadistic tendencies.
“I just reread my post, I can see where you could have misunderstood my post.”
I didn’t misunderstand nothing, You know and I know exactly what your intentions were.
Your reading something into my comments that aren’t there.
If I had done what you accuse me of I wouldn’t have apologized.
Please calm down.
And please do not insult my intelligence. I also read your posts and know very well how you roll.
Can we please stop making this thread about you ?
I apologized, that’s how I roll.
I’ll do it again even
I’m sorry I upset you
Hopefully, people will catch on that we really are on a war footing with those leftist scum.
You have to remember that all you’ve heard has been recorded with a tiny cheap cell phone microphone. They have terrible dynamic range and distort sound, especially sounds that are very loud. What you’re hearing is only a tiny part of the audio spectrum. And the part of the spectrum they are worst with is picking up low frequencies.
I’ve fired a 30.06 before, and it is tremendously more powerful than the left’s favorite “scary” black rifle, the AR-15. I’ve watched it take a large coffee can full of water and shred it like an apple peel. Much of the damage it does is not just the hole it punches, but the hydrodynamic shock wave it creates internally. I will say due to knowing that, I would have expected a much more gruesome wound, but if it deflected off the vest it may have only “grazed” (relatively speaking) Charlie’s neck, but enough to slice the carotid artery.
I guess with the USA, the stakes are so high. And liberals understand that. The USA is the beacon to the world, good or bad.
I guess you could say that is was a very, very good shot because it brought about virtually instantaneous death. But I understand your point: if the correct approach is center mass, his shot was marginal, but very unlucky for Charlie.
Democrats?
EAsy shot for anyone with even fairly minimal firearms training. Difficult for an amateur without it.
FOX just now reporting that Patel and Bongino are on FBI jet to Utah. Sounds like this investigation is coming to a milestone of some sort. Perhaps they have the guy. News Conference early evening tonight.
People are claiming the shooter must be a pro, but i question that conclusion. I have put fewer than 100 rounds through my 30.06. And all of them were on a 100-yard range. With a scope, I shot all within 2 inches of the target bullseye. And even without a scope, I consistently came within 6 inches of center. Someone with more range time than I would be more accurate - without being a pro.
Why open sights?
My bet too. Missed the target by a couple of inches, but mission accomplished anyway.
Or some rich liberal.
Wouldn’t shock me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.