Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tulsi Fires Back at Barack Obama, Says She Will be Releasing More Trump-Russia Hoax Docs Tomorrow to Refute Obama’s Statement (VIDEO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/ ^ | Jul. 22, 2025 | Cristina Laila

Posted on 07/22/2025 7:03:12 PM PDT by bitt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: bitt
Everything I've seen about this story that has broken in recent days actually reinforces what I strongly suspected when the reports of the Obama administration's surveillance of the Trump campaign first emerged in late 2016 and early 2017.

1. The original surveillance in the summer of 2016 (if not earlier) had nothing to do with "Russia" and everything to do with simply spying on the Trump campaign for political reasons.

2. The whole "Russian election interference" angle to the story was fabricated after Election Day as an ex post facto narrative that would be used to retroactively justify the illegal surveillance.

3. I may never be 100% certain of this last point, but I am at about a 90% certainty right now: What outraged the Obama-Clinton cabal more than anything else was that the Trump team knew they were under surveillance, and took advantage of this by using it to feed false information to the CIA-FBI people who were leading this.

41 posted on 07/22/2025 9:05:18 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Although my eyes were open, they might just as well be closed.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Sometimes I wish they wouldn’t telegraph their punches


42 posted on 07/22/2025 9:06:21 PM PDT by Fai Mao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt


43 posted on 07/22/2025 9:08:42 PM PDT by MacNaughton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway

Tulsi has fearlessness from heritage.


44 posted on 07/22/2025 9:09:25 PM PDT by Bobbyvotes (TERM LIMITS is the ONLY WAY to get rid of corrupt career politicians. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Bobbyvotes

I was maybe naively thinking Bondi could learn some of that fearlessness from Tulsi. One can hope.


45 posted on 07/22/2025 9:10:49 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten

I strongly disagree with your premise. What he (Obama) is accused of doing has absolutely nothing to do with “election integrity”. He is accused of attempting to subvert the will of The People by foisting a false narrative upon thr duly elected President Of The United States, thereby poisoning any attempt at governing on his (Trump) part.


46 posted on 07/22/2025 9:20:51 PM PDT by Spacetrucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten

I think the deciding factor would be whether, as president, either Trump or Obama were acting in good faith. In the case of Trump and the alternate electors, the SCOTUS decision, as I understand it, says that the president is entitled to a presumption of innocence when engaging in core presidential functions. To prove that Trump acted criminally, you’d have to prove that he believed he lost fair and square and yet attempted to use alternate electors as part of a scheme to remain in power anyway. There is no compelling proof that that was the case. On the contrary.

Now applying the same sort of reasoning to the Obama example, Obama would be entitled to the same presumption of innocence. But what’s different between the Obama example and the Trump example is that there is evidence that Obama DIDN’T believe that Russia interfered in the election. In fact all the evidence he was receiving from his intelligence reports indicated that there was no Russian interference. And yet Obama gave instructions to the intelligence community to rewrite their report on the matter so that it came to a different conclusion. As far as I can tell, he provided no additional intelligence to argue his case. He just gave instructions to the intel community to come to a conclusion that they didn’t really believe and that Obama apparently didn’t believe either.

I don’t know that we have the entire picture yet, but it’s beginning to look like there’s growing proof that Obama knowingly used his presidential powers fraudulently. That’s a game changer and takes away the protections that SCOTUS says he’s entitled to.


47 posted on 07/22/2025 9:27:04 PM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: basalt
if its an obvious “crime” ..then no, hes not protected . And neither is Trump. Youll know it when you see it..whether its “part of the job” or not.

The SCOTUS decision about presidential immunity didn't include any exemption for "an obvious 'crime'" or the like.

Suppose your standard applied. Prosecutors could have asked a DC jury to find that Trump committed an obvious crime. My bet is that the jury would have gone along with it. Then, by your logic, Trump would have no immunity for his actions and could be prosecuted.

That's just not the law.

I'll make another bet: There will be no criminal prosecution of Obama.
48 posted on 07/22/2025 9:27:32 PM PDT by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Obama is toast. Will go down in history as a gigantic fraud and seditious monster.


49 posted on 07/22/2025 9:34:53 PM PDT by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

The American people didn’t send Trump to the White House. The States did through the Electoral College. To say otherwise is to reinforce direct democracy and deprecate the Republic.


50 posted on 07/22/2025 9:38:43 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
18 U.S.C. § 371 - Conspiracy to Defraud the United States EXCERPTS:

18 U.S. Code 371 is a general statute that codifies federal conspiracy laws. Because conspiracy charges can be prosecuted even if no crime was committed, these can be brutal accusations for defendants and their legal representation to fight.

[F]ederal prosecutors can prove there was a conspiracy by showing that the people involved worked together to commit a federal offense. Simply put, conspiracy is an agreement crime that says it is wrong to pursue a goal.

Other crimes:


51 posted on 07/22/2025 9:40:33 PM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Historic post

Just look at that weasel..
I hope his world comes crashing down


52 posted on 07/22/2025 9:40:39 PM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mowowie

Historic post. Just look at that weasel. I hope his world comes crashing down.

Same day w/ Harris and a smirking Hillary.


53 posted on 07/22/2025 10:05:05 PM PDT by Liz (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: All
Swearing-in w/ Harris and a smirking Hillary.


54 posted on 07/22/2025 10:08:13 PM PDT by Liz (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bitt

The rest of what PDJT said:

“... and so were the rest of them. Comey, Clapper, the whole group.”

“They tried to rig a whole election and GOT CAUGHT!”

He’s got all the cards, and 0 and his fellow conspirators have none.


55 posted on 07/22/2025 10:10:37 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((the more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Liz wrote:


Obama caught withh his pants down,

Here’s the duplicitous Obama at President Trump’s swearing -in ceremony, knowing he had set in motion the Hillary-financed “get Trump” hoax. Did the perspicacious Trump have an inkling the dastardly pretender Obama was about to be exposed as a traitor who plotted the ruination of US democracy?

I think so; look at the picture of PDJT pointing at 0 some time after that pic was taken.


56 posted on 07/22/2025 10:12:49 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((the more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bitt

😂


57 posted on 07/22/2025 10:13:36 PM PDT by nutmeg (The American Flag is my 'pride flag')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Crimes aren’t protected.


58 posted on 07/22/2025 10:14:55 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((the more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57
Liz wrote:“Obama caught with his pants down,Here’s the duplicitous Obama at President Trump’s swearing -in ceremony, knowing he had set in motion the Hillary-financed “get Trump” hoax. Did the perspicacious Trump have an inkling the dastardly pretender Obama was about to be exposed as a traitor who plotted the ruination of US democracy?==========I think so; look at the picture of PDJT pointing at 0 some time after that pic was taken.

--------------------------------------------------

Same day w/ grotesque Harris and a smirking Hillary.


59 posted on 07/22/2025 10:21:59 PM PDT by Liz (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Not enough yet

* The claim will be, “Russia, influenced the election, and in doing so thus, helped elect President Trump.

* There will have to be direct hard “paper trail” 🗞️💻evidence that the Imposter and his Conspirators, planted the story itself. Something along the line of the Nixon Tapes.
(A counter”confession” from Russia itself would never be believed either.)

Will see tomorrow...


60 posted on 07/22/2025 10:40:01 PM PDT by Varsity Flight ( "War by 🙏 the prophesies set before you." ) I Timothy 1:18. Nazarite warriors. 10.5.6.5 These Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson