Posted on 07/12/2025 11:09:08 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
Now Zohran Mamdani, in addition to ticking off the Jewish Americans who make up 11% of his city’s population, is ticking off Italian-Americans (another large minority). An old Twitter post (2020) has resurfaced, and it’s not a good look for the wannabe mayor of the Big Apple.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Giving the finger to a statue of Columbus
He did this TWO YEARS after becoming a US citizen
Imagine coming to a country, and within 2 years of becoming a naturalized citizen, publicly agitate against the foundation of its cultural history, its statues, its holidays?
Who does such a thing?
Mamdani and his family scream ownership by some foreign/globalist/intel organization, with deep roots and ability to manipulate politics and public opinion in the USA.
Sorry, everyone, but please try to look at the big picture, outside the box.
Some here said they were voting for Bill Clinton because once he got in its would prove to the American people how horrible the Dems’ policies are and it would sink the Dem Party forever.
Reality: on the day he was impeached they loved him.
“Public approval After his impeachment proceedings in 1998 and 1999, Clinton’s rating reached its highest point at 73% approval. He finished with a Gallup poll approval rating of 65%, higher than that of every other departing president measured since Harry Truman.”
Sorry to tell it but MANY Americans are going to want Mamdani and his communist policies. Including the brainwashed school system graduates who believe America is on stolen land and socialism is good.
NYC Jews will vote for him no matter what. Italian heritage,... nope.
Rumor has it he leads in the polls. But, aoc, jeffrees, schumuckee, nadler........
Rape, torture and butchering children won’t move the media from its overriding agenda; get Trump. It’s as simple as that.
Va fangool, Mamdani!
New Yorkers have an obviously good candidate in Curtis Sliwa — the Republican candidate the New York Times and other media are too quick to dismiss — because of the obviousness of the choice. What use would the New York Times and all the other propaganda media be if they could not convince us that up is down, left is right, men are women, best is worst, etc?
He may be the Donald Trump of 2016 — who nobody gave a chance to win the presidency — which is precisely why a lot of us thought to test that out. He may be precisely the guy New York City needs — a hands-on guy willing to do what nobody else even thinks to do — because he’s not a lifelong bureaucrat or entitled child of liberal privilege who doesn’t have any idea of making in the real world.
And there are 960,000 Jewish people in New York City.
Time to wake up and see the real world. Overdue.
I attended a discussion event about the Holocaust years ago.
A rabbi answered the question from a young Jewish college student: “Why didn’t many more leave when the signs were so obvious in Germany?”
Rabbi (paraphrased): They couldn’t believe Germany, where they had always lived, was going to continue supporting the rise of the radical Hitler, the country that was considered the pinnacle of culture for symphonic music, literature, art, respected universities and science. They couldn’t accept the truth that ended up destroying them.
Excellent comment. Thanks.
Absolutely no chance in hell for Sliva
The 8 pct that votes will elect the socialist
“You can lead a horse to water — but you can’t force it to drink.”
The first thing is to acknowledge the best candidate — and not dismiss them because of our estimation of their chances to win. You’re not voting for that; you’re hopefully voting for whomever can do the best job — based on their track record for actually doing things — and not merely mouthing slogans because they have no idea what those consequences are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.