Posted on 06/27/2025 6:45:12 AM PDT by george76
BTt
What’s a GOP? I just changed to unaffiliated
I hope Vance kicks this RAT to the curb. Time to take out the big stick and take power away from the leftist kooks.
RINOs always want to not work for the better. They would take a mild case of gas by any senator as a reason to adjourn for the rest of the year.
It is if you are weak stupid incompetent and traitorous. Why is this so hard to figure out? Are we tired of this WINNING? Lock. Her. Up!!! We. Love. You!!!
Who is her husband ?
Parliamentarian is an unelected official, charged with keeping up the rules of discussion and voting procedures.
All she can do is suggests how proceedings should be done.
She can be overruled on anything by a simple vote.
She has no authority on anything!
> Thune absolutely does not have to accept MacDonough’s rulings <
And of course Thune knows that. But it’s very convenient cover: I want to do what’s best for the country. But that mean ol’ Parliamentarian won’t let me!
As a side note, I looked up the last time the Senate Parliamentarian was overruled. To my surprise, it was way back in 1975.
For an officer mentioned nowhere in the Constitution, the Senate Parliamentarian evidently has considerable power.
John Thune Says Senate Won't Overrule Parliamentarian on Medicaid Provision
Is it the gop doesn’t want to pass the bill and can now blame the parliamentarian ?
Hey Thune..even the wuss Trent Lott FIRED A PARLIAMENTARIAN WHEN FACED WITH SAME PROBLEM!
GROW A PAIR, PUBBIES!.
SO WHO IS HER HUSBAND? Please tell us....i couldn’t find it.
TRENT LOTT FIRED one in 2001!
CALL THUNE!
Not actually they overruled her when they revoked CA’s EV mandate waiver
Do not know - it is well hidden .. please let me know if you find out.
Who is her husband ?
The Byrd Rule that defines what can be in a Reconciliation bill is explicit. The Parliamentarian has no particular power, as people are suggesting. It is the Byrd Rule that has the power. She interprets is, and does so strictly.
This particular person ALSO RULED AGAINST DEMs a few years ago when they attempted to put unrelated text into a budget bill they intended to pass on Reconciliation.
At that time, the Dems made a concerted effort to ignore her.
Ignoring her is in effect shutting off the 60 vote cloture rule. It is the only reason anyone cares what she has to say. If the Senate were even 50% ready to shut off the 60 vote rule, then the budget bill would not need to pass under Reconciliation rules. It could pass under normal order.
But the Dems could not get 51 votes to end the filibuster 60 vote rule. Manchin and Sinema opposed doing so.
The same will be true today. We will not get 51 votes to end the filibuster 60 vote rule. Choosing to ignore the Parliamentarian is choosing to ignore the Byrd Rule. It is choosing to end the filibuster 60 vote requirement.
Thune is right. The 60 vote requirement is what stands in the way of imposing narrow majorities onto any sort of law, extreme or otherwise. It is a conservative aspect of the Senate. It is an obstacle to law making, and law making is in general intrusion of government on private lives, a distinctly non conservative thing.
I think that broad has been there long enough and it’s time to replace her.
Good grief.
“I hope Vance kicks this RAT to the curb.”
He must. He’s got to ride in on the coattails of the Iran bombing, some good SCOTUS rulings, peace deals happening, etc. Everything is on a high; just keep it going.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.