Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Warned About Unelected, Rogue Judges — Until Trump Started Fighting Them
Federalist ^ | June 24, 2025 | Brianna Lyman

Posted on 06/25/2025 4:20:08 AM PDT by george76

Everything Democrats warned about before Trump returned to office is exactly what they’re either now celebrating or dismissing.

President Donald Trump’s second term has been plagued by leftist-led lawfare — with unelected, inferior court judges usurping executive authority in an effort to obstruct or dictate presidential actions.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer admitted in a March interview with Kristen Welker that lawfare is part of Democrats’ success strategy.

“Now we have to fight that back in every single way. And we actually have had over 100 cases in the courts where we’ve had a very good record of success. So Donald Trump, infuriated by that success, said judges should be impeached,” Schumer said. “Democrats in the Senate will not impeach judges. Full stop.”

“And democracy is at risk. Look, Donald Trump is a lawless, angry man. He thinks he should be king. He thinks he should do whatever he wants, regardless of the law, and he thinks judges should just listen to him,” Schumer stated.

But Trump pointing out judicial overreach doesn’t put “democracy … at risk” any more than Schumer did when he warned about the dangers of unelected judges dictating national policy.

“[R]ight-wing activists are exploiting the current makeup of the judicial system to circumvent the legislation process and overturn the will of the American people. … We can’t let unelected judges thrash our democracy,” Schumer said on April 10, 2024. Schumer’s comments were highlighted in a recent release from the Senate Judiciary Committee pointing out Democrats’ hypocrisy on nationwide injunctions.

Schumer was hardly alone. Senate Judiciary Democrats one year prior said: “In the coming days, the Supreme Court is expected to decide if one activist judge can single-handedly disregard decades of medical consensus.”

Or take Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dick Durbin in April of 2023 who stated: “This weekend, a single federal judge in Texas issued a decision that seeks to deny millions of women across the country access to an FDA-approved medication. …” He also asserted that the injunction was a “draconian ruling.”

Rhode Island Democrat Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse warned in May of 2024 that judges are usurping the authority of the Congressional branches with their decisions. “Appellate courts can make sweeping decisions endangering the American principle that policy-making belongs in elected branches and not with judges,” Whitehouse said.

“The Constitution’s ‘case or controversy’ requirement protects against free-range judicial policy-making …” Whitehouse said, adding several weeks later that “the Constitution limits courts to deciding individual cases or controversies, not writing ‘decisions for the ages,’ to keep unaccountable judicial power in check.”

Democrat Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono said on April 26, 2023, that “activist plaintiffs should not be able to hand-pick individual judges to set nationwide policy.”

Meanwhile, Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan said on September 14, 2022, that “It just can’t be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stopped for the years that it takes to go through the normal process.”

And yet everything Democrats warned about before Trump returned to office is exactly what they’re either now celebrating or dismissing.

Some examples of judicial tyranny include District Court Judge John McConnell Jr., who issued a temporary restraining order in February blocking Trump from pausing federal spending after Trump issued a freeze to assess the mass waste and abuse of taxpayer dollars. Notably, McConnell had seemingly compared Trump to a tyrant and said it is the “courts” that have been responsible for keeping the country on track. Then there was Colorado Federal Judge Gordon Gallagher — a Biden appointee — who blocked the Trump administration from deporting the family of radical Islamist terrorist Mohamed Soliman. Soliman allegedly set a dozen Jewish demonstrators on fire during a recent peaceful demonstration calling for the release of hostages.

And on Monday night, a rogue federal judge openly defied the Supreme Court, claiming a ruling from the highest court of the land is irrelevant and that the lower court order still remains in effect.

As described in these pages by Justin Evan Smith, these rulings are not “judicial review, but judicial rule.” Both parties have warned about judicial supremacy. But now, with Trump back in office, Democrats are accusing Trump of creating a constitutional crisis by saying what Democrats had said previously — not because they mean it, but because, as Schumer said, it’s part of Democrats’ strategy to undermine the Trump administration.

Faced with a despotic judiciary, Trump must refuse obedience to a faction of activist judges who are attempting to seize powers never granted to them.

As I’ve written before, “There is a judicial coup underway in this country. The presidency cannot remain functional — and the Republic cannot remain sovereign — if its core powers are subject to the whims of rogue, lawless judges.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: article2; democrats; interference; judgewatch; judicialcoup; judicialmisconduct; lawfare; noauthority; nojurisdiction; obstruction; sabotage; undermining; unlawfulorders

1 posted on 06/25/2025 4:20:08 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

.


2 posted on 06/25/2025 4:33:34 AM PDT by sauropod (Make sure Satan has to climb over a lot of Scripture to get to you. John MacArthur Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I guess this means we have rogue judges because of rogue senators?? Thank goodness for Donald Trump!


3 posted on 06/25/2025 4:49:52 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

This will all come to a head. Its good that Trump is forcing the issue early in his presidency while he still has time to do something about it. Congress has a nuclear option - passing legislation that restricts the lower courts or starves them.


4 posted on 06/25/2025 4:56:48 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
“ Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer admitted in a March interview with Kristen Welker that lawfare is part of Democrats’ success strategy.”

Tacitus: 'The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.'

5 posted on 06/25/2025 5:10:39 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Democrats strategy is what’s killing their party and it’s a good thing it savea others from doing it.


6 posted on 06/25/2025 6:06:15 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

If John Roberts and the rest of the woke Supreme Court “justices” had a modicum of moral and intellectual clarity, they would immediately call a halt to the rogue judges destroying the USA and interfering with President Trump’s attempts to safeguard the American People and the Republic.


7 posted on 06/25/2025 7:20:11 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Nothing inflames unrest in the delusional, and nothing inflames unrest in the evil, like TRUTH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Instead of Democrats siding with Republicans in order to MAGA, which both parties used to do after losing an election, they now seek to incite an insurrection thinking most of the US would back them on that. The question is do the sheeple outnumber the patriots these days?


8 posted on 06/25/2025 8:31:10 AM PDT by antidemoncrat (In a way ge is right as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

bump


9 posted on 06/25/2025 2:26:06 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (Think about it: The Supreme Court is nine lawyers appointed for life by politicians. —David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson