Posted on 06/02/2025 6:25:12 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Unfortunately, Raskin was not arguing that people really need to learn to use their guns against terrorists more quickly and with deadly accuracy, which is the lesson that any normal human being would have to stop crazed Islamist terrorists from setting Jews on fire.
Instead, he really went on television to argue that the attack in Colorado, in which an enraged Islamist attacked Jewish protesters, is a prime example of why we need more gun restrictions and stricter background checks for gun purchasers.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Not being able to defend yourself or another makes you a participant in the harm.
He opened his mouth and removed all Doubt i see
Ratskin is truly an idiot. There were no guns involved this time whatsoever! What a moron!
Yes and yes. And a marxist for added enjoyment.
Exactly.
The terrorist tried to buy a gun. He couldn’t because of gun laws. So yes, we must need more gun laws.
Except no guns were used in the Colorado attack, so how would “gun control” have changed it?
Why not all three?
All of the above....
He embodies a special kind of stupid.
Kind of like when David N. Dinkins (NY Mayor) called for more gun control when a tourist was stabbed with a knife on the NY subway
Illegal alien Egyptian = need more gun control?
Yeah, no.
We need more immigration control
Is Raskin this retarded or evil or what?
More government power and control is always the answer, even if it does not make any sense.
According to Raskin, fluffy bunnies and pretty butterflies cavorting in the sunny meadow indicate that we need more gun control.
Perpetual Darwin Award recipient.
Yeah no gun was used but that commie idiot needed to change the narrative since the perp is one of their own
Colorado attack proves we need to separate good people from evil people.
Anyone privileged to be in the US who gives aid and comfort to Terrorists, to violent criminals should have the privilege to be in the US revoked by removing that undesirable from the US.
If the un-privileged wants to fight it in court, he can fight it while not in the US.
To be in the US is a privilege, not a right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.